The Role of Research and Technology Organizations in Innovation Processes of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Abstract

The main challenge in innovation seems to be not a lack of ideas, but a deficit in the evaluation and transformation of ideas into new processes or products. Due to their specific characteristics and the fact that innovations of SMEs are application-oriented, SMEs depend on external know-how for fundamental research. They therefore need a support network that translates the knowledge necessary for successful innovation into their language. Technical feasibility studies provided by research and technology organizations (RTOs) are designed to promote this knowledge transformation and transfer to SMEs. In this paper, the authors examine whether or not technical feasibility studies can facilitate knowledge transfer between SMEs and RTOs. The results of a literature review and an empirical investigation of the Feasibility Studies Program of the Austrian Industrial Research Promotion Fund reveal evidence of a stimulating effect of technical feasibility studies on SMEs' innovative activities. They also identify prerequisites for SMEs to tap the full potential of their interaction with RTOs. First, there has to be a developed research scene that is willing and able to meet the needs of SMEs. Second, SMEs have to recognize the potential advantages of working together with RTOs in the innovation process and to overcome their common fear of contact with RTOs. The insights presented may enhance the quality of similar initiatives now and in the future.

Keywords

innovation feasibility studies strategies RTOs SMEs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bessant

(1999), ‘The rise and fall of “Supernet”: A case study of technology transfer policy for smaller firms’, Research Policy, Vol 28, No 6, pp 601–614.

Bessant

Rush

(1995), ‘Building bridges for innovation: The role of consutants in technology transfer’, Research Policy, Vol 24, No 1, pp 97–114.

Brandner

Rumpelmayr

Sterkl

(1997), Analyse ueber die Moeglichkeiten zur Foerderung des Technologietransfers in KMU unter spezieller Beruecksichtigung der Moeglichkeiten und Programme, Working Paper der Wirtschaftsuniversitaet Wien, Vienna.

Carayannis

E. G.

(2006), ‘Technological learning for entrepreneurial development (TL4ED) in the knowledge economy (KE): Case studies and lessons learned’, Technovation, Vol 26, No 4, pp 419–443.

Cohen

W. M.

Levinthal

D. A.

(1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 35, No 1, pp 128–152.

Cooper

J. R.

(1998), ‘A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation’, Management Decision, Vol 36, No 8, pp 493–502.

Gray

(2006), ‘Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurial small firms’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol 12, No 6, pp 345–360.

Harhoff

(1996), ‘Innovationsaktivitaeten kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen – Ergebnisse des Mannheimer Innovationspanels’, Schriftenreihe des ZEW, Vol 8.

Hoffman

(1998), ‘Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: A literature review’, Technovation, Vol 18, No 1, pp 39–55.

10.

Hornschild

(1997), ‘Innovationsorientierte kleine und mittlere Unternehmen: Ihre Bedeutung fuer die Volkswirtschaftslehre und Ansaetze fuer eine adaequate Foerderpolitik’, in Ridinger

, ed, Gesamtwirtschaftliche Funktionen des Mittelstandes, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 73–89.

11.

Humphreys

McAdam

Leckey

(2005), ‘Longitudinal evaluation of innovation implementation in SMEs’, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol 8, No 3, pp 283–304.

12.

Hyvaerinen

(1995), ‘SME financiers' qualitative evaluation criteria in development projects’, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol 41, Nos 1–3, pp 167–178.

13.

Jennings

Young

D. M.

(1990), ‘An empirical comparison between objective and subjective measures of the product innovation domain of corporate entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol 15, No 1, pp 53–66.

14.

Kameoka

Ito

Kobayashi

(2001), ‘A cross-generation framework for deriving next generation innovation process model’, IEEE Engineering Management Society, Vol 10, No 8, pp 7–12.

15.

Kaufmann

Toedtling

(2002), ‘How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of Upper Austria’, Technovation, Vol 22, No 3, pp 147–159.

16.

Khilji

S. E.

Mroczkowski

Bernstein

(2006), ‘From invention to innovation: Toward developing an integrated innovation model for biotech firms’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol 23, pp 528–540.

17.

Kline

S. J.

(1985), ‘Innovation is not a linear process’, Research Management, Vol 28, No 2, pp 36–45.

18.

Lawson

C. P.

Longhurst

P. J.

Ivey

P. C.

(2006), ‘The application of a new research and development project selection model in SMEs’, Technovation, Vol 26, No 2, pp 242–250.

19.

Lund

Wright

(1999), ‘The financing of small firms in the United Kingdom’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Vol 39, No 2, pp 195–201.

20.

Maas

(1990), Determinanten betrieblichen Innovationsverhaltens, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.

21.

Morgan

Colebourne

Thomas

(2006), ‘The development of ICT advisors for SME businesses: An innovative approach’, Technovation, Vol 26, No 8, pp 980–987.

22.

Mugler

(1998), Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Klein- und Mittelbetriebe, Springer, Vienna and New York.

23.

Muller

(2001), Innovation Interaction Between Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, An Analysis in Terms of Evolution, Knowledge and Territories, Physica, Heidelberg and New York.

24.

Narula

(2004), ‘R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation’, Technovation, Vol 24, No 2, pp 153–161.

25.

Narver

J. C.

Slater

S. F.

MacLachlan

D. L.

(2004), ‘Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol 21, pp 334–347.

26.

Österreichische Investitionskredit (1990), Forschungs- und Entwicklungsmanagement fuer Klein- und Mittelbetriebe in Oesterreich, Schriftenreihe der Oesterreichischen Investitionskredit AG, Wien.

27.

Reichart

(2002), Kundenorientierung im Innovationsprozess. Die erfolgreiche Integration von Kunden in den fruehen Phasen der Produktentwicklung, Gabler, Wiesbaden.

28.

Rothwell

(1994), ‘Towards the fifth-generation innovation process’, International Marketing Review, Vol 11, No 1, pp 7–31.

29.

Rothwell

Zegveld

(1985), Reindustrialization and Technology, Longman, Harlow.

30.

Sawers

J. L.

Pretorius

M. W.

Oerlemans

L. A. G.

(2008), ‘Safeguarding SMEs dynamic capabilities in technology innovative SME–large company partnerships in South Africa’, Technovation, Vol 28, pp 171–182.

31.

Scozzi

Garavelli

Crowston

(2005), ‘Methods for modelling and supporting innovation processes in SMEs’, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol 8, No 1, pp 120–137.

32.

Specht

Beckmann

Amelingmeyer

(2002), F&E-Management, Kompetenz im Innovationsmanagement, Schaeffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.

33.

Storey

(1992), ‘United Kingdom: Case study in small and medium-sized enterprises’, in Technology and Competitiveness, OECD, Paris.

34.

Tang

(1995), ‘Technological alliances between HEIs and SMEs: Examining the current evidence’, in Bennett

Steward

, eds, Proceedings of the European Conference on Management of Technology, Technological Innovation and Global Challenges, Aston University, Birmingham, pp 147–154.