This paper reports an investigation of governance issues in Italian academic spin-offs that arise from the need to balance the powers of two categories of partner: academic inventors and external investors (such as established companies and venture capital funds). The relationship between inventors and external investors, jointly pursuing a research-based entrepreneurial opportunity, provides an interesting case for the application of the agency theory construct to define adequate corporate governance procedures. The paper has two main objectives: to analyse the governance models adopted by academic spin-offs and to ascertain whether the very nature of entrepreneurial opportunity, and the associated uncertainties that a new venture faces, influence the choice of the governance model adopted. A sample group of 30 Italian academic spin-offs is analysed and three different governance models, inventor-led spin-offs, mixed-led spin-offs and investor-led spin-offs, are defined.
AlvarezS.A.BarneyJ. (2008), ‘Opportunity, organizations and entrepreneurship’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol 2, No 3, pp 171–173.
2.
AmitR.BranderJ.ZottC. (1998), ‘Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 13, pp 441–466.
3.
AndersonP.TushmanM.L. (1990), ‘Technological discontinuities and dominant design: A cyclical model’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 35, No 1, pp 604–633.
4.
BergemannD.HegeU., ‘Venture capital financing, moral hazard and learning’, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol 22, pp 703–735.
5.
BerleA.MeansG. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Commerce Clearing House, New York.
6.
BlairD.HitchensD. (1998), Campus Companies – UK and Ireland, Ashgate, Aldershot.
7.
BranscombL.M.AuerswaldP.E. (2001), Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Executives and Investors Manage High Tech Risks, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8.
BrettA.GibsonD.SmilorR. (1991), University Spin-off Companies, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
9.
CesaroniF.MoscaraP.PiccalugaA. (2005), ‘Le imprese spin-off della ricerca in Italia: Modelli di sviluppo e percorsi di crescita’, Piccola Impresa-Small Business, No 3, pp 81–128.
10.
ClarysseB.KnockaertM.LockettA. (2007), ‘Outside board members in high tech start-ups’, Small Business Economics, Vol 29, No 3, pp 243–259.
11.
CummingD. (2006), ‘Adverse selection and capital structure: Evidence from venture capital’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 30, No 2, pp 155–183.
12.
DasguptaP.DavidP.A. (1994), ‘Toward a new economics of science’, Research Policy, Vol 23, No 5, pp 487–521.
13.
DayG.SchoemakerP. (2000), Wharton on Managing Emerging Technologies, John Wiley, New York.
14.
de BettigniesJ.E.BranderJ. (2007), ‘Financing entrepreneurship: Bank finance versus venture capital’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 22, pp 808–832.
15.
DechenauxE.ThursbyJ.ThursbyM. (2011), ‘Inventor moral hazard in university licensing: The role of contracts’, Research Policy, Vol 40, No 1, pp 94–104.
DosiG. (1982), ‘Technological paradigm and technological trajectories’, Research Policy, Vol 11, No 3, pp 147–162.
18.
FamaE.JensenM. (1983), ‘Separation of ownership and control’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol 26, pp 301–325.
19.
FilatotchevI. (2008), ‘Developing an organizational theory of corporate governance: Comments on Henry L. Tosi (2008)’, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol 12, No 2, pp 171–178.
20.
FreemanC.SoeteL. (1997), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21.
GompersP. (1995), ‘Optimal investment, monitoring and the staging of venture capital’, Journal of Finance, Vol 50, No 5, pp 1461–1489.
22.
GrantR. (2006), L'analisi strategica per le decisioni aziendali, Il Mulino, Bologna.
23.
JensenM.MecklingW. (1973), ‘Theory of the firm, managerial behaviour, agency costs and capital structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 3, pp 305–360.
24.
KirznerI. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
25.
KleinP. (2008), ‘Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action and economic organization’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol 2, No 3, pp 175–190.
26.
KnightF.H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.
27.
KnockaertM.WrightM.ClarysseB.LockettA. (2010), ‘Agency and similarity effects and the VC's attitude towards academic spin-out investing’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 35, No 6, pp 567–584.
28.
LangloisR. (2005), ‘The entrepreneurial theory of the firm and the theory of the entrepreneurial firm’, Department of Economics Working Paper Series, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
29.
MarchJ. (1991), ‘Exploration and exploitation’, Organizational Science, Vol 2, No 1, pp 71–87.
30.
MasonC.HarrisonR. (2004), ‘Does investing in technology-based firms involve higher risk? An exploratory study of the performance of technology and non-technology investments by business angels’, Venture Capital, Vol 6, No 4, pp 313–332.
31.
MitchellW.SinghK. (1992), ‘Incumbent's use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol 18, pp 347–372.
32.
NoteboomB. (2000), Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33.
PorterM. (1980), Competitive Strategy, The Free Press, New York.
34.
RobertsE. (1991), Entrepreneurship in High Technology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35.
RobertsE.MaloneR. (1996), ‘Policies and structures for spinning new companies from research and development organizations’, R&D Management, Vol 26, No 1, pp 17–48.
36.
SarasvathyS.DewN.RamakrishnaV.VenkataramanS. (2005), ‘Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity’, in AcsZ. J.AudretschD. B., eds, Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Springer, New York.
37.
SchillingM. (2005), Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
38.
ShaneS. (2003), A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual–Opportunity Nexus, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
39.
ShaneS. (2004), Academic Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
40.
SorrentinoM. (2008), Le imprese science-based, Carocci, Roma.
41.
StevensonH.GumpertD. (1985), ‘The heart of entrepreneurship’, Harvard Business Review, Vol 63, No 2, pp 85–94.
42.
ThursbyJ.JensenR.ThursbyM. (2001), ‘Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 26, No 1, pp 59–72.
43.
TosiH.L. (2008), ‘Quo vadis? – suggestions for future corporate governance research’, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol 12, No 2, pp 153–169.
44.
VohoraA.WrightM.LockettA. (2004), ‘Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spin-out companies’, Research Policy, Vol 33, No 1, pp 147–175.
45.
WrightM.VohoraA.LockettA. (2002), Annual UNICO–NUBS Survey on University Commercialization Activities: Financial 2001, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham.
46.
ZeckhauserR. (2006), ‘Investing in the unknown and unknowable’, Capitalism and Society, Vol 1, No 2, Article 5.
