The Use of Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) and Social Network Site (SNS) Hosted Forums in Higher Education

Abstract

Grounded theory is used to examine the role and application of both educator-led and student-led forums within a virtual learning environment (VLE) of a higher education institution (HEI). The study reports experiences and perceptions of academics in two faculties (business and technology) in the HEI who use both asynchronous VLE forums and social network sites (SNSs) such as Facebook. Interview data were transcribed, coded and analysed to identify emergent themes and patterns of commonality. Differences between faculties are identified, including those relating to the type, frequency and breadth of forum usage. The results suggest that students' voluntary use of SNSs as a complement to formal learning is culturally embedded in the HEI and constitutes a widely accepted ‘integral’ part of the learning experience. Such rapidly evolving usage could present future challenges for educators, not least because SNS-hosted learning materials and patterns of SNS use may be obscured from them. There are also challenges relating to educators' duty of care, surreptitious exchange of information (for example, assessment information) and unhelpful criticism of HEIs.

Keywords

virtual learning environment social networks forums pedagogy learners

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annese

Traetta

(2011), ‘A methodological approach for blended communities: Social network analysis and positioning network analysis’, in Daniel

B.K.

, ed, Handbook of Research on Methods and Techniques for Studying Virtual Communities, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp 103–121.

Anon (2011), Facebook, Facebook FAQ 06 10, Academic Development Centre, Kingston University available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/31719802/Facebook-Faq-06-10, last accessed 07 September 2011.

Backman

Kyngäs

H.A.

(1999), ‘Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a novice researcher’, Nursing and Health Sciences, Vol 1, No 3, pp 147–153, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nhs.1999.1.issue-3/issuetoc, last accessed 02 March 2012.

Bates

A.W.

(2005), Technology, E-learning and Distance Education, 2nd ed, Routledge, New York.

Berk

R.A.

(2010), ‘How do you leverage the latest technologies, including Web 2.0 Tools, in your classroom?’, International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, Vol 6, No 1, pp 1–13, available at: http://www.sicet.org/journals/ijttl/issue1001/1_Berk.pdf, last accessed 30 June 2011.

Bosch

T.E.

(2009), ‘Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town’, Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, Vol 35, No 2, pp 185–200, available at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/02500160903250648&magic=crossref‖D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3, last accessed 31 May 2011.

Bower

J.L.

Christensen

C.M.

(1995), ‘Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave’, Harvard Business Review, Vol 73, No 1, pp 43–53, available at: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/∼spencer/courses/ethics/misc/bower.pdf, last accessed 02 March 2012.

Boyd

D.M.

Ellison

N.B.

(2010), ‘Social network sites’, in Donelan

Kear

Ramage

, eds, Online Communication and Collaboration: A Reader, Routledge, New York, pp 30–33.

Charlton

Devlin

Drummond

(2009), ‘Using Facebook to improve communication in undergraduate software development teams’, Computer Science Education, Vol 19, No 4, pp 273–292, available at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/08993400903384935&magic=crossref‖D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3, last accessed 31 May 2011.

10.

Charmaz

(1995), ‘The body, identity and self: Adapting to impairment’, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol 36, No 4, pp 657–680, available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4121346, last accessed 02 March 2012.

11.

Charmaz

(2006), Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, Sage, London.

12.

Chenitz

W.C.

Swanson

J.M.

(1986), From Practice to Grounded Theory: Qualitative Research in Nursing, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.

13.

Cole

Foster

(2007), Using Moodle: Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System, 2nd ed, O'Reilly Community Press, Sebastopol, CA.

14.

Culkin

Mallick

(2011), ‘Producing work-ready graduates: The role of the entrepreneurial university’, International Journal of Market Research, Vol 53, pp 347–368

15.

Denscombe

(2003), The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 2nd ed, Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA and Maidenhead.

16.

Denzin

N.K.

Lincoln

Y.S.

, eds (2003), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 2nd ed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

17.

DeSchryver

Mishra

Koehleer

Francis

(2009), ‘Moodle vs Facebook: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction?’, in Gibson

, eds, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2009, AACE, Vancouver, pp 329–336, available at: http://www.editlib.org/p/30612, last accessed 02 March 2012.

18.

Duboff

(2005), ‘“Poke” your Prof: Faculty discovers the Facebook.com’, Yale Daily News, available at: http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2005/mar/24/poke-your-prof-faculty-discovers-thefacebookcom/, last accessed 04 June 2011.

19.

Ellis

R.A.

Ginns

Piggott

(2009), ‘E-learning in higher education: Some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study’, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol 28, No 3, pp 303–318, available at: http://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/JOURNALS/H090600E.pdf, last accessed 02 March 2012.

20.

Frey

J.H.

Fontana

, (1991), ‘The group interview in social research’, Social Science Journal, Vol 28, No 2, pp 175–187, available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/036233199190003 M, last accessed 11 June 2011.

21.

Glaser

B.G.

(1992), Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs Forcing, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

22.

Glaser

B.G.

(2009), ‘The novice GT researcher’, Grounded Theory Review, Vol 8, No 2, pp 1–21.

23.

Goldthorpe

J.H.

(2000), On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives and The Integration of Research and Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

24.

Gray

D.E.

(2009), Doing Research in the Real World, 2nd ed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

25.

Gray

Annabell

Kennedy

(2010), ‘Medical students' use of Facebook to support learning: Insights from four case studies’, Medical Teacher, Vol 32, No 12, pp 971–976, available at: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0142159X.2010.497826, last accessed 04 June 2011.

26.

Hedberg

J.G.

(2011), ‘Towards a disruptive pedagogy: Changing classroom practice with technologies and digital content’, Educational Media International, Vol 48, No 1, pp 1–16, available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09523987.2011.549673, last accessed 11 June 2011.

27.

Hemmi

Bayne

Land

(2009), The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol 25, No 1, pp 19–30, available at: http://www.malts.ed.ac.uk/staff/sian/JCALpaper_final.pdf, last accessed 11 April 2011.

28.

Howe

Matson

R.J.

Strauss

(2000), Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation, Vintage Books, New York.

29.

Kear

(2010), ‘Collaboration via online discussion forums’, in Donelan

Kear

Ramage

, eds, Online Communication and Collaboration: A Reader, Routledge, New York, pp 30–33.

30.

Kirschner

P.A.

Karpinski

A.C.

(2010), ‘Facebook® and academic performance’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol 26, No 6, pp 1237–1245, available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563210000646, last accessed 04 June 2011.

31.

Kulchitsky

J.D.

Wright

Ricker

(2009), ‘Assessing the discriminant ability of the MEBIR scale: An on-line versus on-campus application’, International Journal of Management Education, Vol 7, pp 69–79, available at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/bmaf/documents/publications/IJME/vol7no3/IJME7no3Paper7.pdf, last accessed 07 September 2011.

32.

Lancaster

(2005), Research Methods in Management: A Concise Introduction to Research in Management and Business Consultancy, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

33.

Livingstone

Ólafsson

Statksrud

(2011), Social Networking, Age and Privacy, available at: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/ShortSNS.pdf, last accessed 05 June 2011.

34.

Morris

Reese

Beck

Mattis

(2009), ‘Facebook usage as a predictor of retention at a private 4-year institution’, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, Vol 11, No 3, pp 311–322, available at: http://baywood.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.2190/CS.11.3.a, last accessed 04 June 2011.

35.

Parchoma

(2011), ‘Toward diversity in researching teaching and technology philosophies-in-practice in e-learning communities’, in Daniel

, ed, Handbook of Research on Methods and Techniques for Studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena, IGI Global, Philadelphia, PA, pp 61–86.

36.

Parnell

J.A.

Carraher

(2003), ‘The Management Education by Internet Readiness (MEBIR) scale: Developing a scale to assess personal readiness for internet-mediated management education’, Journal of Management Education, Vol 27, pp 431–446, available at: http://jme.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1052562903252506, last accessed 07 September 2011.

37.

Parry

(2011), ‘Harvard researchers accused of breaching students’ privacy’, The Chronicle of Higher Education, available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Harvards-Privacy-Meltdown/128166/?sid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en, last accessed 22 July 2011.

38.

Prensky

(2009), ‘H sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom’, Innovate: Journal of Online Education, Vol 5, No 3, available at: http://www.wisdompage.com/Prensky01.html, last accessed 03 March 2012.

39.

Reynolds

Fell

(2011), ‘The effect of e-learning on student placement in the community’, Primary Health Care, Vol 21, No 5, pp 28–32, available at: http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/royal-college-of-nursing-rcn/the-effect-of-e-learning-on-student-placement-in-the-community-m45w2Z4 Da8, last accessed 03 March2012.

40.

Salmon

(2000), E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online, Kogan Page, London.

41.

Salmon

(2002), E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning, Kogan Page, London.

42.

Shea

(1994), Netiquette, ed 1.0, Albion Books, San Francisco, CA, available at: http://www.albion.com/bookNetiquette/, last accessed 03 March 2012.

43.

Strauss

A.L.

Corbin

J.M.

(1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

44.

Sutherland

Brotchie

Chesney

(2011), Pebblegogy: Ideas and Activities to Inspire and Engage Learners, Pebble Learning, Telford.

45.

Sweeney

Donoghue

Whitehead

(2004), ‘Traditional face-to-face and web-based tutorials, a study of university students: Perspectives on the roles of tutorial participants’, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol 9, No 3, pp 311–323, available at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/1356251042000216633&magic=crossref‖D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3, last accessed 10 August 2011.

46.

Toffler

(1971), Future Shock, Pan, London.

47.

Watters

(2011), Google Plus and the Future of Sharing Educational Resources, Hack Education, available at: http://www.hackeducation.com/2011/07/15/google-plus-and-the-future-of-sharing-educational-resources/, last accessed 16 July 2011.

48.

Wegerif

(1998), ‘The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, available at: http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v2n1/social-dimension-asynchronous-learning-networks, last accessed 04 June 2011.

49.

Weinstein

(2008), ‘A tool for accessing accounting cases’, Journal of Accounting Education, Vol 23, No 3, pp 204–214.

50.

Wells

de Lange

Fieger

(2008), ‘Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second-year accounting course: Determinants of overall student perception’, Accounting and Finance, Vol 48, No 3, pp 503–518.

51.

Wimpenny

Gass

(2000), ‘Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference?’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol 31, No 6, pp 1485–1492, available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10849162, last accessed 03 March 2012.

52.

Young

(2011), ‘NAHT social networking threat bigger than Ofsted’, available at: http://www.naht.org.uk/welcome/naht-events/conferences/annual-conference-2011-general-information/social-networking-threat/?locale=en, last accessed 05 June 2011.