Using the results of an empirical study in the State of Sonora, Mexico, this paper reports on an attempt to identify trends and transformations that have taken place in the way knowledge transfer activities are organized and structured in higher education institutions and research centres. The research was designed to provide a characterization of organizational change that captures its complexity in different dimensions: corporate identity, new interface structures, new functions, new forms of human and financial resource management and intellectual property. To achieve this, information was collected and analysed from documentary sources and generated from a series of interviews with key personnel involved with science–industry linkages in the organizations studied.
ArocenaR.SutzJ. (2001), ‘Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities’, Research Policy, Vol 30, No1, pp 221–1234.
2.
BecherT.KoganM. (1992), Process and Structure in Higher Education, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
3.
BercovitzJ.FeldmanM.FellerI.BurtonR. (2001), ‘Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licensing behaviour: An exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins and Pennsylvania State Universities’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 26, No (1–2), pp 21–35.
4.
BleiklieI.KoganM. (2007), ‘Organization and governance of universities’, Higher Education Policy, Vol 20, pp 477–493.
5.
BokD. (2003), Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6.
ClarkB. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Pergamon Press, New York.
7.
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Centros Públicos de Investigación CONACyT, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A.C. (CIAD), Annual Reports, 2001, 2005, 2006 and 2008.
8.
CortiE.RiviezzoA. (2008), ‘Hacia la universidad emprendedora: Un análisis del compromiso de las universidades italianas en el desarrollo económico y social’, Economía Industrial, Vol 368, pp 113–124.
9.
CortrightJ. (2001), ‘New growth theory, technology and learning: A practitioner's guide’, Reviews of Economic Development Literature and Practice, No 4, p 35.
10.
CruzC.SanzM.MartínesC. (2010), ‘Research centers in transition: Patterns of convergence and Diversity’, Journal of Technology Transfer, published online, 06 April 2010, http://springerlink.com/content/01 h1556583q24245/, last accessed 25 September 2010.
11.
DiMaggioP.J.PowellW. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, Vol 48, No 2, pp 147–160.
12.
DurandJ.P. (2008), El desarrollo de la investigación en Sonora, X Congreso nacional de Investigación Educativa, Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa, A.C. Veracruz.
13.
EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL. (1997), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations, Cassell, London.
14.
EtzkowitzH. (2003), ‘Research groups as “quasi firms”: The invention of the entrepreneurial university’, Research Policy, Vol 32, No 2, pp 109–121.
15.
FFCT (2012), Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico: Sonora, Diagnóstico en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación2004–2011, Mexico D.F.
16.
FriedmanJ.SilbermanJ. (2003), ‘University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 28, No 1, pp 17–30.
17.
GeunaA.MuscioA. (2009), ‘The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature’, Minerva, Vol 47, No 1, pp 93–114.
18.
GeunaA.NestaL. (2006), ‘University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence’, Research Policy, Vol 35, pp 790–807.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotnyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London.
21.
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) (2006), Plan Estratégico de Mediano Plazo del INIFAP 2006–2011, Publicación EspecialNo 1, 27 April.
22.
Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora (2004), Informe de Actividades 2003–2004, Rector Mtro Gonzalo Rodrí guez Villanueva, Cd-Obregón.
KimY.C. (2009), The Rise of Organized Transfer: Institutional Learning of Technology Transfer in American Research Universities, VDM Verlag, see http://www.vdmpublishinggroup.com.
LeónB.SandovalG.LópezL. (2009), ‘Vinculación y transferencia de conocimiento de los investigadores de Sonora: Un enfoque basado en la importancia de los factores individuales’, Región y Sociedad, Vol 21, No 45, pp 65–96.
27.
LockettA.WrightM. (2005), ‘Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies’, Research Policy, Vol 34, No 7, pp 1043–1057.
28.
MarginsonS.ConsidineM. (2000), The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29.
MarkmanG.D.PhanP.H.BalkinD.B.GianiodisP.T. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 20, No 2, pp 241–263.
30.
MartinM. (2000), Managing University–Industry Relations: A Study of Institutional Practices of 12 different Countries, International Institute for Educational Planning, Paris.
31.
MoweryD.NelsonR.SampatB.ZiedonisA. (2004), Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University–Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
32.
OpertiE. (2007), ‘Entrepreneurial universities: Organizational change in academic institutions’, paper presented at ‘Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Policies: The 2007 Ratio Colloquium for Young Social Scientists’, 23–25 August, Stockholm.
33.
PhanP.SiegelD.S. (2006), ‘The effectiveness of university technology transfer: Lessons learned from quantitative and qualitative research in the US and the UK’, Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics, No 609.
34.
PolanyiM. (1962), ‘The republic of science: Its political and economic theory’, Minerva, No 1, pp 54–73.
35.
RobertsE.B.MaloneD.E. (1996), ‘Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations’, R&D Management, Vol 26, No 1, pp 17–48.
36.
SiegelD.WaldmanD.LinkA. (2003), ‘Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study’, Research Policy. Vol 32, No 1, pp 27–48.
37.
SlaughterS.LeslieL. (1997), Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
38.
Sotelo (2008), Coyunturas económicas en la producción del conocimiento en Sonora, Memoria del Congreso Sistemas de Innovación y Competitividad (SINNCO), Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Guanajuato, León, Guanajuato, México.
39.
Universidad de Sonora (2005), Informes Anual 2004–2005, Rector Pedro Ortega Moreno, Hermosillo, pp 189–200.
40.
Universidad de Sonora (2009), Informes Anual 2008–2009, Rector Pedro Ortega Moreno, Hermosillo, pp 207–216.
