Can university knowledge exchange give small businesses the ability to gain competitive advantage? The main purpose of this study is, first, to understand the limitations for small firms in absorbing knowledge from higher education institutions and, second, to ascertain whether access to knowledge resources, such as a university, can be an antecedent factor for building absorptive capacity in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and creating business value. The paper is a conceptual study in which a model for knowledge exchange between a management school and SMEs is proposed. The model was developed, drawing on the literature and prior SME knowledge exchange expertise of the management school, to deliver a three-year project funded by the European Regional Development Fund. The project, ‘Innovation for Growth’, is designed to embed innovation in the business processes and practices of 300 SMEs in the north-west of England. This paper offers recommendations for improving policy aimed at supporting the innovation process of small firms; a proposed model of knowledge exchange between university and small firms; and a strategy for small businesses to improve their absorptive capacity.
BarneyJ. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, Vol 17, pp 771–792.
2.
BessantJ.TsekourasG.RushH. (2009), ‘Getting the tail to wag – developing innovation capability in SMEs’, 10th International CINet Conference: Enhancing the Innovation Environment, 6–8 September, Brisbane, Australia.
3.
BruneelJ.D'EsteP.SalterA. (2010), ‘Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration’, Research Policy, Vol 39, No 7.
4.
CohenW.M.LevinthalD.A. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 35, No 1, pp 128–152.
5.
CopeJ.WattsG. (2000), ‘Learning by doing: An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour Research, Vol 6, No 4, pp 104–124.
6.
CoshA.HughesA. (2010), ‘Never mind the quality feel the width: University–industry links and government financial support for innovation in small high-technology businesses in the UK and the USA’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 35, pp 66–91.
7.
DTI (2003), ‘Competing in the global economy: The innovation challenge’, DTI Innovation Report, Department of Trade and Industry, London, website: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file12093.pdf (accessed March 2007).
8.
FosfuriA.TriboJ.A. (2008), ‘Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance’, Omega, Vol 36, pp 173–187.
9.
FreseM.SchmidtP.BauschA.RauchA.KabstR. (2005), ‘Evidence-based entrepreneurship: A systematic approach to cumulative science’, Technical Report, University of Giessen.
10.
GalankisK. (2006), ‘Innovation process. Make sense using systems thinking’, Technovation, Vol 26, pp 1222–1232.
11.
GoldJ.ThorpeR. (2008), ‘Training, it's a load of cp!”: The story of the hairdresser and his “Suit”’, Human Resource Development International, Vol 11, pp 385–399.
12.
GordonI.JackS. (2010), ‘HEI engagement with SMEs: Developing social capital’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol 16.
JensonM.B.JohnsonB.LorenzE.LundvallB.L. (2007), ‘Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation’, Research Policy, Vol 36, pp 680–693.
15.
JohnstonL.HamiltonE.ZhangJ. (2008), ‘Learning through engaging with higher education institutions: A small business perspective’, International Small Business Journal, Vol 26, p 651.
16.
KimL. (1997), ‘The dynamics of Samsung's technological learning in semiconductors’, California Management Review, Vol 39, pp 86–100.
LeitchC.M.HarrisonR.T. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurial learning: Researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 29, No 2, pp 351–371.
19.
LinkA.N.TasseyG., eds (1989), Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry, University, Government Relationship, Kluwer, Boston, MA.
20.
LockettN.KerrR.RobinsonS. (2008), ‘Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between higher education institutions and industry’, International Small Business Journal, Vol 26, No 6, p 661.
21.
MurovecN.ProdanI. (2009), ‘Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model’, Technovation, Vol 29, No 12, pp 859–872.
22.
RauchA.FreseM. (2006), ‘Meta-analysis as a tool for developing entrepreneurship research and theory’, in WiklundJ.DimovD.KatzJ.A.ShepherdD., eds, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 29–52.
23.
SmithS.M. (2011), ‘SME leaders' learning in networked learning: An actor-network theory and communities of practice theory informed analysis’, PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
24.
TodorovaG.DurisinB. (2007), ‘Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 32, No 3.
25.
TwomeyD.F.QuaziH. (2000), ‘Antecedents and dynamics of the business school–business interface’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol 8, No 2, pp 179–199.
ZahraS.A.GeorgeG. (2002), ‘Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 27, No 2, pp 185–203.
28.
ZhangJ.HamiltonE. (2010), ‘Entrepreneurship education for owner-managers: The process of trust building for an effective learning community’, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol 23, No 3, pp 249–270.
