In this paper, the example of cocoa production in Ghana is used to explore how the narratives portraying African farmers have changed over the last 70 years. These evolving narratives are explored through the notion of a ‘good farmer’. The argument is that, as the image of African farmers has been progressively rehabilitated (from ignorant and tradition-bound to skilled and research-minded), the image of formal research and extension has suffered. This reversal was associated with the progressive disempowering of formal agricultural research. With the recent renewed interest in agricultural development, narratives about African farmers are again evolving: ‘good farmers’ are now increasingly being defined as those who approach their farming as a proper business.
BrammerH. (1980), ‘Some innovations don't wait for experts: A report on applied research by Bangladeshi farmers’, CERES, Vol 13, No 2, pp 24–29.
5.
BrycesonD.F. (1996), ‘Deagrarianization and rural employment in sub-Saharan Africa: A sectoral review’, World Development, Vol 24, No 1, pp 97–111.
6.
BrycesonD.F. (2002), ‘The scramble in Africa: Reorienting rural livelihoods’, World Development, Vol 30, No 5, pp 725–739.
7.
ChambersR. (1986), Normal Professionalism, New Paradigms and Development, Discussion Paper 227, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.
8.
Clarence-SmithW.G. (2000), Cocoa and Chocolate, 1765–1914, Routledge, London.
9.
ConnellJ. (1991), ‘Farmers experiment with a new crop’, in, HaverkortB.van de KampJ.Waters-BayerA., eds, Joining Farmers' Experiments: Experiences in Participatory Technology Development, Intermediate Technology, London.
10.
EllisF.FreemanH.A. (2004), ‘Rural livelihoods and poverty reduction strategies in four African countries’, Journal of Development Studies, Vol 40, No 4, pp 1–30.
11.
GreenR.H.HymerS.H. (1966), ‘Cocoa in the Gold Coast: A study in the relations between African farmers and agricultural experts’, Journal of Economic History, Vol 26, No 3, pp 229–319.
GunnarssonC. (1978), The Gold Coast Cocoa Industry, 1900–1939, Production, Prices and Structural Change, The Economic History Association, Lund.
14.
HallA.BockettG.TaylorS.SivamohanM.V.K.ClarkN. (2001), ‘Why research partnerships really matter: Innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor’, World Development, Vol 29, No 5, pp 783–797.
15.
HillP. (1965), The Migrant Cocoa Farmers of Southern Ghana, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16.
KayG.B. (1972), The Political Economy of Colonialism in Ghana, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17.
PrettyJ.N. (1995), ‘Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture’, World Development, Vol 23, No 8, pp 1247–1263.
18.
ReardonT. (1997), ‘Using evidence of household income diversification to inform study of rural non-farm labour markets in Africa’, World Development, Vol 25, No 5, pp 735–747.
19.
RhoadesR. (1989), ‘The role of farmers in the creation of agricultural technology’, in ChambersR.PaceyA.ThruppL.A., eds, Farmer First, Intermediate Technology, London.
20.
RogersE.M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, 2 ed, Collier Macmillan and The Free Press, New York and London.
21.
SpielmanD.J.EkboirJ.DavisK. (2009), ‘The art and science of innovation systems inquiry: Applications to sub-Saharan African agriculture’, Technology in Society, Vol 31, pp 399–405.
22.
SumbergJ. (2005), ‘Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa’, Food Policy, Vol 30, No 1, pp 21–41.
TilleyH. (2003), ‘African environments & environmental sciences: The African Research Survey, ecological paradigms & British colonial development’, in BeinhartW.McGregorJ., eds, Social History & African Environments, James Currey, Oxford.
25.
VelJ.VeldhuizenL.V.PetchB. (1991), ‘Beyond the PTD approach’, in, HaverkortB.van de KampJ.Waters-BayerA., eds, Joining Farmers' Experiments: Experiences in Participatory Technology Development, Intermediate Technology, London.
26.
World Bank (1986), ‘Draft report on Third Cocoa Project for Ghana’, Ghana Agricultural Sector Review, World Bank Report No 5366-GH, World Bank, Washington, DC.
