In order to evaluate e-marketing systems in the aquaculture value chain, the authors conducted a study on the aquachoupal model in the East and West Godavari districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. Developmental impact and measurement of information dissemination were evaluated using Sen's capability approach and Brown's information-based approach. Quality of service as a component of the value chain is very important for e-marketing, yet difficult to assess due to its complex and intangible nature. In this study, an analytical hierarchy process was used to examine changes in service quality as a result of e-marketing. The study showed that the aquachoupal had been helpful in improving human resource development through the value chain channels of growth and productivity. It also increased the volume, coverage and diversity of information flows in the study area. There has been significant improvement in service quality in the aquaculture value chain as a result of e-marketing.
BrownD. (1991), ‘Methodological considerations in the evaluation of social development programmes: An alternative approach’, Community Development Journal, Vol 26, No 4, pp 259–265.
3.
DangiN.SinghH. (2010), ‘e-Choupal: Hope or hype?’American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Vol 2, No 2, pp 179–184.
EckerlundI.EklofJ.A.Nathorst-BoosJ. (2000), ‘Patient satisfaction and priority setting in ambulatory health care’, Total Quality Management, Vol 11, No 7, pp 967–978.
7.
Economic Intelligence Unit (2000), ‘The e-business value chain: winning strategies in seven global industries’, website: http://www.eiu.com.
8.
GounarisS.DimitriadisS. (2003), ‘Assessing service quality on the Web: Evidence from business-to-consumer portals’, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol 17, No 5, pp 529–548.
9.
KangH.K.BradleyG. (2002), ‘Measuring the performance of IT services: An assessment of SERVQUAL’, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Vol 3, No 3, pp 151–164.
10.
LiY.N.TanK.C.XieM. (2002), ‘Measuring web-based service quality’, Total Quality Management, Vol 13, No 5, pp 685–700.
11.
MadonS, (2004), ‘Evaluating the development impact of e-governance initiatives: An exploratory framework’, Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, Vol 20, No 5, pp 1–13.
12.
MadonS. (2006), ‘Evaluating the development impact of e-governance initiatives: An exploratory framework’, in AshwaniS.VijayabaskarM.GayathriV., eds, ICTs and Indian Social Change: Diffusion, Governance, Poverty, Sage India, New Delhi, pp 268–289.
13.
MahalakshmiP. (2010), ‘Information kiosk’, in PrasadR.M.HansraB.S.JainP.K., eds, Information and Communication Technology in Agriculture: Computer Networking, RAE 004, School of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, pp 28–47.
14.
MahalakshmiP.VimalaD.D.KrishnanM. (2008), ‘Web kiosks in aquaculture: A study of aquachoupal model in Prakasam district of Andhra Pradesh’, in VasanthakumarJ.BhaskaranC.PhilipH., eds, Extension Strategies for Fostering Knowledge Centric Agricultural Growth, Society of Extension Education, Coimbatore, pp 66–72.
15.
MataniA.G. (2007), ‘Information technology improving retail marketing in agriculture’, in Proceedings of International Marketing Conference on Marketing & Society, Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode.
16.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlV.A.BerryL.L. (1985), ‘Conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research’, Journal of Marketing, Vol 49, No 4, pp 41–50.
17.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlV.A.BerryL.L. (1988), ‘SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality’, Journal of Retailing, Vol 64, No 1, pp 12–40.
18.
PrahaladC.K. (2006), The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits, 1 ed, Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
19.
RamanathanR.GaneshL.S. (1994), ‘Group preference aggregation method employed in the AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving member weightages’, European Journal of Operation Research, Vol 79, pp 249–265.
20.
RayS.RaoV.V. (2004), ‘Evaluating government service: A customers' perspective of e-government’, in Proceedings of 4th European Conference on e-Government, Dublin, Ireland, pp 627–638.
21.
SaatyT.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting and Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
22.
SaatyT.L. (2000), Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.
23.
SinghS. (2007), ‘Agribusiness in South Asia, a fact sheet’, Centre for Management in Agriculture, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
