Lessons on Transdisciplinary Research in a Co-Innovation Programme in the New Zealand Agricultural Sector

Abstract

A recently implemented research and development (R&D) programme in New Zealand is attempting to implement co-innovation principles throughout the country's agricultural sector. It is based on an agricultural innovation systems (AIS) approach, using five innovation platforms (IPs) based in the leading industries, plus a national-level I P. This paper presents and analyses the emerging challenges of operationalizing transdisciplinary research connected to co-innovation in the context of the programme. The main challenges relate to managing the complexity of a multi-stakeholder network, aligning the formal procedures for research funding and IPs with a co-innovation approach that requires flexibility, and changing participants' framing of innovation from linear to interactive models. Our conclusion is that ‘learning by doing’ is essential in operationalizing co-innovation. Its practical implications still need to be translated into institutional changes in the national R&D structures so that policies, instruments and incentives enable co-innovation. It is envisaged that the higher-level innovation platform will drive these changes.

Keywords

agricultural innovation system implementation innovation platforms New Zealand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borrás

(2011), ‘Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies’, Science and Public Policy, Vol 38, pp 725–734.

Bos

A.P.

Koerkamp

Groot P.W.G.

Gosselink

J.M.J.

Bokma

(2009), ‘Reflexive interactive design and its application in a project on sustainable dairy husbandry systems’, Outlook on Agriculture, Vol 38, No 2, pp 137–145.

Botha

, ed (2013), Co-Innovation and Innovation Systems: Glossary of Terms, AgResearch, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Flood

R.L.

(2010), ‘The relationship of “systems thinking” to action research’, Systems Practice and Action Research, Vol 23, pp 269–284.

Gibbons

Limoges

Nowotny

(1994), New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.

Harris

Lyon

(2013), ‘Transdisciplinary environmental research: Building trust across professional cultures’, Environmental Science and Policy, Vol 31, pp 109–119.

Kilelu

C.W.L.

Klerkx

Leeuwis

(2013), ‘Unraveling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme’, Agricultural Systems, Vol 118, pp 65–77.

Klerkx

Adjei-Nsiah

Adu-Acheampong

Saïdou

Zannou

E.T.

Soumano

Sakyi-Dawson

van Paassen

Nederlof

(2013), ‘Looking at agricultural innovation platforms through an innovation champion lens: An analysis of three cases in West Africa’, Outlook on Agriculture, Vol 42, No 3, pp 185–192.

Klerkx

Leeuwis

(2009), ‘Operationalizing demand-driven agricultural research: Institutional influences in a public and private system of research planning in The Netherlands’, Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, Vol 15, pp 161–175.

10.

Klerkx

Nettle

(2013), ‘Achievements and challenges of innovation: Co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors. A comparative study’, Food Policy, Vol 40, pp 74–89.

11.

Klerkx

Van Mierlo

Leeuwis

(2012), ‘Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions’, in Darnhofer

Gibbon

Dedieu

, eds, Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 457–483.

12.

Lenné

J.M.

(2008), ‘Research into Use: Managing achievements for impact’, Outlook on Agriculture, Vol 37, No 1, pp 23–30.

13.

Nettle

Brightling

Hope

(2013), ‘How programme teams progress agricultural innovation in the Australian dairy industry’, Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, Vol 19, No 3, pp 271–290.

14.

Röling

(2009), ‘Pathways for impact: Scientists' different perspectives on agricultural innovation’, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, Vol 7, No 2, pp 83–94.

15.

Roux

D.J.

Stirzaker

R.J.

Breen

C.M.

Lefroy

E.C.

Cresswell

H.P.

(2010), ‘Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs’, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol 13, No 8, pp 733–741.

16.

Sumberg

(2005), ‘Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa’, Food Policy, Vol 30, No 1, pp 21–41.

17.

Sumberg

Heirman

Raboanarielina

Kaboré

(2013), ‘From agricultural research to “product development”: What role for user feedback and feedback loops?’ Outlook on Agriculture, Vol 42, No 4, pp 233–242.

18.

van Mierlo

Arkesteijn

Leeuwis

(2010), ‘Enhancing the reflexivity of system innovation projects with system analyses’, American Journal of Evaluation, Vol 31, pp 143–161.