This paper provides an analysis of the reporting of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties by newspapers across the globe between 1996 and 2013. The aim of the research was to explore whether the significant increase in GM crop area between those years had been paralleled by an increase in press reporting and, if so, whether this was linked to more positive or negative views of the technology. The results suggest that the increase in GM area has been paralleled by an increase in newspaper reporting, and the pattern over time is similar across Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, North America and Oceania. Topics typically associated with critiques of GM had significantly lower article counts compared with some that could be associated with more positive visions of GM. Indeed, the pattern suggests reporting that was, if anything, mildly positive towards GM up until 2013.
AugoustinosM.CrabbS.ShepherdR. (2010), ‘Genetically modified food in the news: Media representations of the GM debate in the UK’, Public Understanding of Science, Vol 19, No 1, pp 98–114.
2.
BauerM.W. (2005), ‘Public perceptions and mass media in the biotechnology controversy’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol 17, No 1, pp 5–22.
3.
BotelhoD.KurtzH. (2008), ‘The introduction of genetically modified food in the United States and the United Kingdom: A news analysis’, Social Science Journal, Vol 45, pp 13–27.
4.
ConnerA.J.GlareT.R.NapJ.-P. (2003), ‘The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment’, The Plant Journal, Vol 33, No 1, pp 19–46.
5.
CookG.RobbinsP.T.PieriE. (2006), ‘“Words of mass destruction”: British newspaper coverage of the genetically modified food debate, expert and non-expert reactions’, Public Understanding of Science, Vol 15, pp 5–29.
6.
CurtisK.R.McCluskeyJ.J.SwinnenJ.F.M. (2008), ‘Differences in global risk perceptions of biotechnology and the political economy of the media’, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Vol 8, No 1/2, pp 77–89.
7.
FedoroffN.V. (2010), ‘The past, present and future of crop genetic modification’, New Biotechnology, Vol 27, No 5, pp 461–465.
8.
FlipseS.M.OsseweijerP. (2013), ‘Media attention to GM food cases: An innovation perspective’, Public Understanding of Science, Vol 22, No 2, pp 185–202.
9.
FrewerL.LassenJ.KettlitzB.ScholdererJ.BeekmanV.BerdalK.G. (2004), ‘Societal aspects of genetically modified foods’, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol 42, pp 1181–1193.
10.
FrewerL.J.MilesS.MarshR. (2002), ‘The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk’, Risk Analysis, Vol 22, No 4, pp 701–711.
11.
GruèreG.SenguptaD. (2011), ‘Bt cotton and farmer suicides in India: An evidence-based assessment’, Journal of Development Studies, Vol 47, No 2, pp 316–337.
12.
HoffmanC.A. (1990), ‘Ecological risks of genetic engineering of crop plants’, BioScience, Vol 40, No 6, pp 434–437.
13.
HerringR.J. (2006), ‘Why did “Operation Cremate Monsanto” fail?’Critical Asian Studies, Vol 38, pp 467–493.
14.
Horlick-JonesT.WallsJ.RoweG.PidgeonN.PoortingaW.MurdockG.O'RiordanT. (2007), The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement, Routledge, Abingdon.
15.
HughesE. (2005), ‘The contaminated risk of GM crops: Nationalism and the genetic modification debate’, Journal of Public Affairs, Vol 5, Nos 3–4, pp 251–262.
16.
ListermanT. (2010), ‘Framing of science issues in opinion-leading news: International comparison of biotechnology issue coverage’, Public Understanding of Science, Vol 19, No 1, pp 5–15.
17.
MarksL.A.KalaitzandonakesN.AllisonK.ZakharovaL. (2003), ‘Media coverage of agrobiotechnology: Did the butterfly have an effect?’Journal of Agribusiness, Vol 21, No 1, pp 1–20.
18.
MarksL.A.KalaitzandonakesN.WilkinsL.ZakharovaL. (2007), ‘Mass media framing of biotechnology news’, Public Understanding of Science, Vol 16, pp 183–203.
19.
MosesV. (2015), ‘GM crops in the media’, GM Crops & Food, Vol 6, No 1, pp 1–12.
20.
NapJ.-P.MetzP.L.J.EscalerM.ConnerA.J. (2003), ‘The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part I. Overview of current status and regulations’, The Plant Journal, Vol 33, No 1, pp 1–18.
21.
PimentelD.HunterM.S.LaGroJ.A.EfroymsonR.A.LandersJ.C.MervisF.T.McCarthyC.A.BoydA.E. (1989), ‘Benefits and risks of genetic engineering in agriculture’, BioScience, Vol 39, No 9, pp 606–614.
22.
PriestS.H. (2001), A Grain of Truth: The Media, the Public, and Biotechnology, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
23.
RuparV. (2007), ‘Newspapers' production of common sense. The “greenie madness” or why should we read editorials?’Journalism, Vol 8, No 5, pp 591–610.
24.
ScholdererJ. (2005), ‘The GM foods debate in Europe: History, regulatory solutions, and consumer response research’, Journal of Public Affairs, Vol 5, pp 263–274.
25.
SchurmanR. (2004), ‘Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe’, Social Problems, Vol 51, No 2, pp 243–268.
26.
ShinehaR.HibinoA.KatoK. (2008), ‘Analysis of Japanese newspaper articles on genetic modification’, Journal of Science Communication, Vol 7, No 2, pp 1–9.
27.
SoleriD.ClevelandD.A.GlasgowG.SweeneyS.H.CuevasF.A.FuentesM.R.RíosL.H. (2008), ‘Testing assumptions underlying economic research on transgenic food crops for Third World farmers: Evidence from Cuba, Guatemala and Mexico’, Ecological Economics, Vol 67, No 4, pp 667–682.
28.
UzogaraS.G. (2000), ‘The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century: A review’, Biotechnology Advances, Vol 18, pp 179–206.
29.
Vilella-VilaM.Costa-FontJ. (2008), ‘Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food’, Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol 37, No 5, pp 2095–2106.
30.
WeinerC. (2001), ‘Drawing the line in genetic engineering: Self-regulation and public participation’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Vol 44, No 2, pp 208–220.
