This paper addresses the recovery in Thailand after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. The country worst affected by the tsunami was Indonesia, while in Thailand about 8,000 people were assumed dead. In all the countries affected more females were killed than males. Disasters test the strength of a society's structures and relationships, and this paper focuses on the interplay between gender, vulnerability and social resilience. It provides an overview of social resilience as a concept and theory and discusses vulnerability and resilience in disaster situations. The paper is based on findings from a long period of anthropological fieldwork, which included interviews with survivors and relatives and with Buddhist monks and nuns. Buddhist temples, monks and nuns played important roles after the tsunami and became a refuge for survivors, and this paper explores religion as a resilience factor. Religious explanations and daily and other religious practices were of major significance in the recovery process, and Thai people have shown themselves to be both vulnerable and resilient.
AguirreBenignoE. (2006), On the Concept of Resilience, Disaster Research Centre, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
2.
AlexanderDavid (1997), ‘The study of natural disasters, 1977–1997: Some reflections on a changing field of knowledge’, Disasters, Vol 21, No 4, pp 283–304.
3.
CalgaroEmmaLloydKate (2008), ‘Sun, sea, sand and tsunami: Examining disaster vulnerability in the tourism community of Khao Lak, Thailand’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, Vol 29, pp 288–306.
4.
CalgaroEmma (2009), Destination Vulnerability Assessment for Khao Lak, Thailand: Sustainable Recovery and Resilience Building in the Tsunami Affected Region, Environment Institute, Stockholm.
5.
FalkMonica Lindberg (2007), Making Fields of Merit: Buddhist Female Ascetics and Gendered Orders in Thailand, NIAS Press, Copenhagen, and University of Washington Press, Washington, DC.
6.
FalkMonica Lindberg (2008), ‘Gender and religious legitimacy in Thailand’, in BurghoornWil, eds, Politics in Asia: Women Manoeuvring within Dominant Orders, NIAS Press, Copenhagen.
7.
FalkMonica Lindberg (2010), ‘Recovery and Buddhist practices in the aftermath of the Tsunami in Southern Thailand’, Religion, Vol 40, pp 96–103.
8.
GaillardJean-Christophe (2008), ‘Ethnic groups' response to the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia’, Natural Hazards, Vol 47, No 1, pp 17–38.
9.
GlickenMorleyD. (2006), Learning from Resilient People: Lessons We Can Apply to Counselling and Psychotherapy, Sage Publications, London and New Delhi, pp 23–26.
10.
HealyAndrewJ.Somchai Jitsuchon (2007), ‘Finding the poor in Thailand’, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol 18, No 5, pp 739–759.
11.
HollingC.S. (1973), ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol 4, pp 1–23.
KendraJamesM.WachtendorfTricia (2003), ‘Elements of resilience after the World Trade Centre disasters’, Disasters, Vol 27, No 1, pp 37–53.
14.
LebelLouisKhrutmuangSupapornManutaJesse (2006), ‘Tales from the margins: Small fishers in post-tsunami Thailand’, Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol 15, No 1, pp 124–132.
15.
MaguireBirgitHaganPatrick (2007), ‘Disasters and communities: Understanding social resilience’, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Vol 22, No 2.
16.
ManyenaSiambabala Bernard (2006), ‘The concept of resilience revisited’, Disasters, Vol 30, No 4, pp 433–450.
17.
MiletiD.S. (1999), Disaster by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.
18.
MillsMary Beth (1995), ‘Attack of the widow ghosts: Gender, death and modernity in Northeast Thailand’, in OngAihwaPeletzMichael, eds, Bewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 244–273.
19.
MMWR (2005), ‘Rapid health response, assessment and surveillance after a tsunami – Thailand, 2004–2005’, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol 54, pp 61–64.
20.
Oliver-SmithA. (1996), ‘Anthropological research on hazards and disasters’, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol 25, pp 303–328.
21.
Oliver-SmithAnthony (2004), ‘Theorizing vulnerability in a globalized world: A political ecological perspective’, in BankoffGregFrerksGeorgHillhorstDorothea, eds, Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development, and People, Earthscan, London.
22.
Oxfam (2005) The Tsunami's Impact on Women, Oxfam, Oxford.
23.
PargamentKennethI. (1997), The Psychology of Religion and Coping, Guilford Press, New York.
24.
PargamentKennethI.CummingsJeremy (2010), ‘Anchored by faith: Religion as a resilience factor’, in ReichJohnW.ZautraAlexJ.HallJohn Stuart, eds, Handbook of Adult Resilience, Guilford Press, New York.
25.
PimolwanI. (2006), Presentation at the 2nd Annual Conference of Population and Social Research (in Thai, unpublished), Asia Hotel, Bangkok, organized by the Research Institute of Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
RiggJonathanTan-MullinsMayGrundy-WarrCarl (2008), ‘Grounding a natural disaster: Thailand and the 2004 tsunami’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Vol 49, No 2, pp 137–154.
28.
SmithKeithPetleyDavidN. (2009), Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster, Routledge, New York.
29.
Tan-MullinsMayRiggJonathanGrundy-WarrCarl (2008), ‘Responses and resilience of fisherfolks on the tsunami event in southern Thailand’, in DoyleTimothyRiselyMelissa, eds, Crucible for Survival: Environmental Security and Justice in the Indian Ocean Region, Rutgers University Press, New Jersey, New York, and London.
WildavskyAaron (1991), Searching for Safety, Transaction Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
32.
WisnerBenBlaikiePiersCannonTerryDavisIan (2004), At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters, 2 ed, Routledge, London, and New York.
33.
World Health Organization (2005), website: www.who.int/en.
