Nuaulu (Seram, Maluku, Indonesia) manage forest to provision sacred house building and ritual feasting through a system of protected areas (sin wesie), examined here in relation to sasi institutions and scare charms (matakau) that overlap in their functions. Sasi feature in wider debates about how customary practices might deliver conservation objectives. The paper analyses interconnections between these three forms of regulation in the context of deforestation, social change and the recent history of state management interventions.
BaléeWilliamGélyA. (1989), ‘Managed forest succession in Amazonia: The Ka'apor case’, in PoseyDarrell A.BaléeWilliam, eds, Resource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies, Advances in Economic Botany, Vol 7, Botanical Garden Press, New York, pp 129–158.
2.
BerkesFikret (2008), Sacred Ecology, Routledge, New York.
3.
ByersB.A.CunliffeR.N.HudakA.T. (2001), ‘Linking the conservation of culture and nature: A case study of sacred forests in Zimbabwe’, Human Ecology, Vol 29, No 2, pp 187–218.
4.
ColdingJ.FolkeC. (2001), ‘Social taboo: “invisible” systems of local resource management and biological conservation’, Ecological Applications, Vol 11, No 2, pp 584–600.
5.
DavidsonJ.S.HenleyDavid, eds (2007), The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism, Routledge, London, pp 1–49.
6.
EllenRoy (1985), ‘Patterns of indigenous timber extraction from Moluccan rain forest fringes’, Journal of Biogeography, Vol 12, pp 559–587.
7.
EllenRoy (2007), ‘Plots, typologies and ethnoecology: Local and scientific understandings of forest diversity on Seram’, in SillitoePaul, ed, Global vs Local Knowledge, Berghahn, Oxford, pp 41–74.
8.
EllenRoy (2010), ‘Why aren't the Nuaulu like the Matsigenka? Knowledge and categorization of forest diversity on Seram, eastern Indonesia’, in JohnsonLeslie M.HunnEugene S., eds, Landscape Ethnoecology: Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space, Berghahn, Oxford, pp 116–140.
9.
EllenRoy (2012), Nuaulu Religious Practices: The Frequency and Reproduction of Rituals in a Moluccan Society, KITLV Press, Leiden.
10.
FrostNicola (2001), Enabling Fictions: Politics, Representation, and the Environment in Maluku, Indonesia, Goldsmiths Anthropology Research Papers 5, Goldsmiths College, London.
11.
HamiltonL.S. (2002), ‘Forest and tree conservation through metaphysical constraints’, George Wright Forum, Vol 19, No 3, pp 57–78.
12.
HarkesI.NovaczekI. (2003), ‘Institutional resilience of marine sasi, a traditional fisheries management system in central Maluku’, in PersoonG.A.van EstD.SajiseP.E., eds, Co-management of Natural Resources in Asia: A Comparative Perspective, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press, Copenhagen, pp 63–85.
13.
HollemanF.D. (1923), Het Adat-grondenrecht van Ambon en de Oeliasers, Meinema, Delft.
14.
KissyaE. (1995), Sasi Aman Haru-ukui: Traditional Management of Sustainable Natural Resources in Haruku, SEJATI Foundation, Jakarta.
15.
LokolloJ.E.HuliselanMus (1991), Laporan Penelitian Hak Adat Kalautan di Maluku, Yayasan Hualopu, Ambon.
16.
MaffiLuisa, ed (2001), On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
17.
MoniagaS. (2007), ‘From bumiputera to masyarakat adat: A long and confusing journey’, in DavidsonJ.S.HenleyDavid, eds, The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism, Routledge, London, pp 275–294.
18.
MonkKathryn A.de FretesY.Reksodiharjo-LilleyG. (1997), The Ecology of Nusa Tenggara and Maluku, Periplus, Hong Kong.
19.
OstromElinor (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20.
RappaportRoy A. (1967), Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
21.
SasaokaM.LaumonierY. (2012), ‘Suitability of local resource management practices based on supernatural enforcement mechanisms in the local social-cultural context’, Ecology and Society, Vol 17, No 4, p 6, website: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.5751/ES-05124-170406.
22.
TichelmanG.L. (1954), ‘288. Pohung and matakau: Scaring charms of the Bataklands and the Moluccas’, Man, Vol 54, pp 183–185.
23.
VolkerT. (1925 [1921]), ‘Het recht van sasi in de Molukken’, Adatrechtbundels, Vol 24, No 44, pp 293–313.
24.
von Benda-BeckmannFranzvon Benda-BeckmannKeebetBrouwerArie (1995), ‘Changing indigenous environmental law in the central Moluccas: Communal regulation and privatization of sasi’, Ekonesia, Vol 2, pp 1–38.
25.
WadleyReed L.ColferPierce Carol J. (2004), ‘Sacred forest, hunting, and conservation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia’, Human Ecology, Vol 32, No 3, pp 313–338.
26.
WesternDavidWrightR. Michael (1994), ‘The background to community-based conservation’, in WesternDavidWrightR.M., eds, Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–12.
27.
ZernerCharles (1994a), ‘Transforming customary law and coastal management practices in the Maluku islands, Indonesia, 1870–1992’, in WesternDavidWrightR.M., eds, Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 80–112.
28.
ZernerCharles (1994b), ‘Through a green lens: The construction of customary environmental law and community in Indonesia's Maluku Islands’, Law and Society Review, Vol 28, No 5, pp 1079–1122.
