Research Note: Testing the Tourism-Led Growth Hypothesis for Singapore – An Empirical Investigation from Bounds Test to Cointegration and Granger Causality Tests
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2010
Research Note: Testing the Tourism-Led Growth Hypothesis for Singapore – An Empirical Investigation from Bounds Test to Cointegration and Granger Causality Tests
This paper empirically investigates the tourism-led growth (TLG) hypothesis in the case of Singapore by employing the bounds test for cointegration, error correction models and Granger causality tests using annual data from 1960 to 2007. The results confirm the existence of a long-term equilibrium relationship between international tourism and economic growth in the case of Singapore; real income growth converges significantly toward its long-term equilibrium level of 51.4% in the TLG model. The major finding of this study is that the TLG hypothesis is confirmed for the Singaporean economy in the long term as a result of conditional Granger causality tests.
BalaguerJ.Cantavella-JordáM. (2002), ‘Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: The Spanish case’, Applied Economics, Vol 34, No 7, pp 877–884.
2.
ClancyM.J. (1999), ‘Tourism and development: Evidence from Mexico’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 26, No 1, pp 1–20.
3.
Cortés-JiménezI.PulinaM. (2006), ‘A further step into the ELGH and TLGH for Spain and Italy’, Working Paper Series, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Nota Di Lavoro 118.2006, Italy.
4.
DickeyD.FullerW.A. (1981), ‘Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root’, Econometrica, Vol 49, pp 1057–1072.
5.
DristakisN. (2004), ‘Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: An empirical investigation for Greece using causality analysis’, Tourism Economics, Vol 10, No 3, pp 305–316.
6.
GunduzL.Hatemi-JA. (2005), ‘Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis valid for Turkey?’, Applied Economics Letters, Vol 12, pp 499–504.
7.
KatircioğluS. (2009a), ‘Revisiting the tourism-led-growth hypothesis for Turkey using the bounds test and Johansen approach for cointegration’, Tourism Management, Vol 30, No 1, pp 17–20.
8.
KatircioğluS. (2009b), ‘Trade, tourism and growth: The case of Cyprus’, Applied Economics, Vol 41, No 21, pp 2741–2750.
9.
KatircioğluS. (2009c), ‘Testing the tourism-led growth hypothesis: The case of Malta’, Acta Oeconomica, Vol 59, No 3, pp 331–343.
10.
NarayanP.K. (2005), ‘The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests’, Applied Economics, Vol 37, No 17, pp 1979–1990.
11.
NarayanP.K.SmythR. (2004), ‘The relationship between the real exchange rate and balance of payments: Empirical evidence for China from co-integration and causality testing’, Applied Economic Letters, Vol 11, pp 287–291.
12.
OhC.K. (2005), ‘The contribution of tourism development to economic growth in the Korean economy’, Tourism Management, Vol 26, pp 39–44.
13.
OnganS.DemirozD.M. (2005), ‘The contribution of tourism to the long-run Turkish economic growth’, Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, Vol 53, No 9, pp 880–894.
14.
PesaranM.H.ShinY. (1999), ‘An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis’, in StromS., ed, Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Chapter 11.
15.
PesaranM.H.ShinY.SmithR.J. (2001), ‘Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol 16, pp 289–326.
16.
PhillipsP.C.B.PerronP. (1988), ‘Testing for a unit root in time series regression’, Biometrica, Vol 75, pp 335–346.
17.
Statistics Singapore (2009), National Accounts (http://www.singstat.gov.sg, accessed 18 February, 2009).
18.
World Bank (2009), World Development Indicators, CD-ROM database.
