Visits to National Parks and Hiking Areas: A Panel Data Analysis of Their Socio-Demographic,Economic and Site Quality Determinants

Abstract

This study examines the impacts of socio-demographic, economic and park quality determinants on visits to nature areas. The authors apply panel data estimation techniques to Finnish data on 46 national parks and hiking areas between 2000 and 2008. The main results show that ‘visits to nature areas’, as a variable, reacts positively to the population size and quality features but negatively to gasoline prices and income level. Of the age classes, the population share of ‘young retirees’ – people aged between 65 and 74 – increased the number of visits to nature areas significantly, whereas the share of ‘baby boomers’ – people aged between 55 and 64 – was insignificant in explaining the number of visits. As the baby boomers are reaching retirement age, and assuming that their generation behaves like the young retirees in this study, the demand for national parks and hiking areas may increase substantially in the coming years. This will increase the pressure to expand current parks and establish new ones.

Keywords

national parks nature areas panel data fixed effects model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asteriou

Hall

S.G.

(2007), Applied Econometrics, Palgrave, China.

Bell

Petursson

J.G.

(2009), ‘Introduction’, in Bell

Simpson

Tyrväinen

Sievänen

Pröbstl

, eds, European Forest Recreation and Tourism. A Handbook, Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp 1–11.

Bell

Tyrväinen

Sievänen

Pröbstl

Simpson

(2007), ‘Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: A European perspective’, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 1(2) (http://landscaperesearch.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrlr-2007-2/, accessed 18 September 2009).

Bowker

J.M.

Murphy

Cordell

H.K.

English

D.B.K.

Bergstrom

J.C.

Starbuck

C.M.

Betz

C.J.

Green

G.T.

(2006), ‘Wilderness and primitive area recreation participation and consumption: An examination of demographic and spatial factors’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol 38, No 2, pp 317–326.

Cochrane

(2006), ‘A typology of tourists to protected areas’, Parks, Vol 16, No 2, pp 10–17.

Eagles

P.F.J.

McCool

S.F.

(2002), Tourism in National Parks and Protected Areas: Planning and Management, CAB International, New York.

Eagles

P.F.J.

McCool

Haynes

C.D.

(2002), Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: Guidelines for Planning and Management, IUCN Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK, pp 183.

Ejstrund

(2007), ‘Visitor numbers and feasibility studies. Predicting visitor numbers to Danish open-air museums using GIS and multivariate statistics’, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, Vol 6, No 4, pp 327–335.

Greene

W.H.

(2003), Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition, Prentice-Hall International Inc, New Jersey.

10.

Hanink

D.M.

Stutts

(2002), ‘Spatial demand for national battlefield parks’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 29, No 3, pp.707–719.

11.

Hanink

D.M.

White

(1999), ‘Distance effects in the demand for wildland recreational services: The case of national parks in the United States’, Environment and Planning, Vol 31, No 3, pp 477–492.

12.

Heinonen

(ed) (2007), State of the Parks in Finland. Finnish Protected Areas and Their Management from 2000 to 2005, Nature Protection Publications of Metsähallitus, Series A 170, Helsinki.

13.

Hsiao

(1996), Analysis of Panel Data, Econometric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

14.

Kajala

Almik

Dahl

Diksaite

Erkkonen

Fredman

Jensen

F.S.

Karoles

Sievänen

Skov-Petersen

Vistad

O.I.

Wallsten

(2007), Visitor Monitoring in Nature Areas – A Manual Based on Experiences from the Nordic and Baltic Countries, TemaNord, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Bromma, 205 pp.

15.

Loomis

Bonetti

Echohawk

(1999), ‘Demand for and supply of wilderness’, in Cordell

H.K.

, ed, Outdoor Recreation in American Life: A National Assessment of Demand and Supply Trends, Sagamore Publishing, Champaign, IL, pp 351–375.

16.

National Hiking Areas (2009), Metsähallitus, last updated 18 March 2009 (http://www.metsa.fi/sivustot/metsa/en/NaturalHeritage/ProtectedAreas/NationalHikingAreas/Sivut/NationalHikingAreas.aspx, accessed 2 September 2009).

17.

National Parks (2009), Metsähallitus, last updated 18 March 2009 (http://www.metsa.fi/sivustot/metsa/en/NaturalHeritage/ProtectedAreas/NationalParks/Sivut/NationalParksareFinlandsNaturalTreasures.aspx, accessed 2 September 2009).

18.

Neuvonen

Pouta

Puustinen

Sievänen

(2010), ‘Visits to national parks: Effects of park characteristics and spatial demand’, Journal of Nature Conservation, Vol 18, No 3, pp 224–229.

19.

Pergams

O.R.W.

Zaradic

P.A.

(2006), ‘Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices’, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 80, No 4, pp 387–393.

20.

Priskin

(2001), ‘Assessment of natural resources for nature-based tourism: The case of the Central Coast region of Western Australia’, Tourism Management, Vol 22, No 6, pp 637–648.

21.

Pröbstl

Elands

Wirth

(2009), ‘Forest recreation and tourism in Europe: Context, history and current situation’, in Bell

Simpson

Tyrväinen

Sievänen

Pröbstl

, eds, European Forest Recreation and Tourism. A Handbook, Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp 12–32.

22.

Puustinen

Pouta

Neuvonen

Sievänen

(2009), ‘Visits to national parks and the provision of natural and man-made recreation and tourism resources’, Journal of Ecotourism, Vol 8, No 1, pp 18–31.

23.

Resinous

W.S.

Fredman

(2007), ‘Protected areas as attractions’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 34, No 4, pp 839–854.

24.

SAS (2008), SAS/ETS 9.2 User's Guide, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC (http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/ets/index.html, accessed 18 June 2008).

25.

Sievänen

Arnberger

Dehez

Grant

Jensen

F.S.

Skov-Petersen

(2008), ‘Introduction’, in Sievänen

Arnberger

Dehez

Jensen

F.S.

Skov-Petersen

, eds, Forest Recreation Monitoring – A European Perspective, Metlan työraportteja/Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 79, pp 9–13.

26.

Siikamäki

(2009), Use of Time for Outdoor Recreation in the United States, 1965–2007, RFF Discussion Paper No 09-18, Washington, DC.

27.

Teasley

J.R.

Bergstrom

J.C.

Cordell

H.K.

Zarnoch

S.J.

Gentle

(1999), ‘Private lands and outdoor recreation in the United States’, in Cordell

H.K.

, ed, Outdoor Recreation in American Life: A National Assessment of Demand and Supply Trends, Sagamore Publishing, Champaign, IL, pp 183–218.

28.

Theil

(1961), Economic Forecasts and Policy, Second Edition, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

29.

TNS (2009), Scottish Recreation Survey: Annual Summary Report 2007, Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 321 (ROAME No. F02AA614/6), Inverness.

30.

Walls

(2009), Parks and Recreation in the United States: The National Park System, Resources for the Future, Backgrounder, Washington, DC.

31.

Weiler

(2006), ‘A park by any other name: National park designation as a natural experiment in signalling’, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol 60, No 1, pp 96–106.