The cost of displacing fossil fuels: Some evidence from Texas

Abstract

Although technological progress can alter the relative costs of different energy sources, fossil fuels inevitably will be displaced as depletion raises their costs and makes them uncompetitive. They may be displaced sooner if they are taxed to internalize negative externalities. Currently, wind generation or nuclear power, supplemented by bulk electricity storage, are the most feasible alternatives to fossil fuels for electricity generation. The ERCOT ISO in Texas provides a realistic model for examining the costs of replacing fossil fuels by wind generation and storage, and for comparing wind power with generation based on nuclear and storage. ERCOT is relatively isolated from neighboring grids, and wind power was almost a quarter of its total generating capacity at the end of 2016. Using the ERCOT example, we also discuss how the long-run configuration of the electricity supply system affects evolution away from a system dominated by natural gas.

Keywords

Energy transition wind nuclear natural gas electricity storage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BoBmann

Staffell

Iain

(2015). “The shape of future electricity demand: Exploring load curves in 2050s Germany and Britain.” Energy, 90: 1317-1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.082.

Cullen

Joseph A.

(2013). “Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Wind-Generated Electricity.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4): 107-133. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5A107.

Cullen

Joseph A

Mansur

Erin T.

(2017) “Inferring Carbon Abatement Costs in Electricity Markets: A Revealed Preference Approach using the Shale Revolution.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3): 106-133. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150388.

Delucchi

Mark A.

Jacobson

Mark Z.

(2011). “Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies.” Energy Policy, 39: 1170-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2010.11.045.

Green

Richard

Staffell

Iain

(2016). “Electricity in Europe: exiting fossil fuels?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(2): 282-303. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw003.

Green

Richard

Vasilakos

Nicholas

(2011). “The Long-term Impact of Wind Power on Electricity Prices and Generating Capacity.” Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, CCP Working Paper 11-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6039218.

Green

Richard

Vasilakos

Nicholas

(2012). “Storing wind for a rainy day: What kind of electricity does Denmark export?” The Energy Journal, 33(3): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.3.1.

Grubler

Arnulf

(2010). “The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing.” Energy Policy, 38: 5174-5188. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2010.05.003.

Hartley

Peter R.

Medlock III

Kenneth B.

Temzelides

Ted

Zhang

Xinya

(2016). “Energy Sector Innovation and Growth.” The Energy Journal, 37 (1): 233-258. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.1.phar.

10.

Hartley

Peter R.

Medlock III

Kenneth B.

(2017). “The Valley of Death for New Energy Technologies.” The Energy Journal, 38(3): 33-61. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.3.phar.

11.

Jacobson

Mark Z.

Delucchi

Mark A.

(2011). “Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials.” Energy Policy, 39: 1154—1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040.

12.

Joskow

Paul L.

(2011) “Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies.” American Economic Review: Papers &Proceedings, 100(3): 238-241. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10L3.238.

13.

Lokhov

Alexy

(2011). “Load-following with nuclear power plants.” NEA update, NEA News, Nuclear Energy Agency, 29.2: 18-20.

14.

Luo

Xing

Wang

Jihong

Dooner

Mark

Clarke

Jonathan

(2015). “Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation.” Applied Energy, 137: 511-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081.

15.

Qvist

Staffan A.

Brock

Barry W.

(2015). “Potential for Worldwide Displacement of Fossil-Fuel Electricity by Nuclear Energy in Three Decades Based on Extrapolation of Regional Deployment Data.” PLoS ONE, 10(5): e0124074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124074.

16.

Schoenung

Susan M.

Hassenzahl

William V.

(2003). “Long- vs. Short-Term Energy Storage Technologies Analysis: A Life-Cycle Cost Study.” A Study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program, Sandia National Laboratories Sandia Report SAND2003-2783.

17.

Trainer

Ted

(2012). “A critique of Jacobson and Delucchi’s proposals for a world renewable energy supply.” Energy Policy, 44: 476-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.037.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB