External Costs of Transporting Petroleum Products: Evidence from Shipments of Crude Oil from North Dakota by Pipelines and Rail

Abstract

Using data for crude oil transported out of North Dakota in 2014, this paper constructs new estimates of the air pollution, greenhouse gas, and spill and accident costs from long-distance movement of petroleum products by rail and pipelines. Our analysis has three main findings. First, air pollution and greenhouse gas costs are nearly twice as large for rail as for pipelines. Second, air pollution and greenhouse gas costs are much larger than estimates of spill and accidents costs. Third, air pollution and greenhouse gas costs of transporting fuel by rail and pipelines are one-fifth to one-tenth of the costs of combusting fuel in motor vehicles. These results suggest that the policy debate surrounding crude oil transportation may be putting too much relative weight on spills and accidents, while overlooking a far more serious external cost: air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Keywords

Crude oil Air pollution Greenhouse gases Railroads Pipelines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of American Railroads . (2017). The Environmental Benefits of Moving Freight by Rail.

Bushnell

J.B.

Hughes

J.E.

Smith

(2017). “Food vs. Fuel? Impacts of Petroleum Shipments on Agricultural Prices.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper # 23924.

Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. (2009). CTA Transportation Networks.

Covert

T.R.

Kellogg

(2017). “Crude by Rail, Option Value, and Pipeline Investment.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper #23855. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23855.

CMAP . (2016). Create Program Status Check. February 20, 2015.

Econometrica . (2015). Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis Regulatory Development Support Services Pipeline Safety: Safety of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Submitted to Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. October.

Energy Information Administration . (2013). Rail delivery of U.S. oil and petroleum products continues to increase, but pace slows. July 10.

Energy Information Administration . (nd). Crude Oil Production, Monthly and Annual.

Energy Information Administration . (nd). Movements of Crude Oil and Selected Products by Rail.

10.

Energy Information Administration . (nd). Refinery Receipts of Crude Oil by Method of Transportation.

11.

Environmental Protection Agency . (2009). Emission Factors for Locomotives. EPA-420-F-09-025 April 2009.

12.

Environmental Protection Agency . (2011). The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act: 1990—2020. Final Report. Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Policy, Washington, D.C.

13.

Forkenbrock

D.J.

(2001). “Comparison of the external costs of rail and truck freight transportation.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35(4): 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00061-0.

14.

Frittelli

John

, (2014). U.S. Rail Transport of Crude Oil: Background and Issues for Congress. R43390. CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

15.

Genscape

Inc

. (various dates), PetroRail Report, October 2014 to December 2016.

16.

Genscape

Inc

. (2014), MidContinent Pipeline Service Report, data spanning January 2014 to December 2014.

17.

Graff-Zivin

J.S.G.

Kotchen

M.J.

Mansur

E.T.

(2014). “Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions: Implications for electric cars and other electricity-shifting policies.” Journal of Economic Behavior &Organization 107: 248-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.010.

18.

Haling

Cohen

(1995). Air quality cost analysis spreadsheet. Data provided by the authors. Cambridge Systematics. Inc, Washington, DC.

19.

Jaramillo

Muller

N.Z.

(2016). “Air pollution emissions and damages from energy production in the U.S.: 2002-2011.” Energy Policy 90: 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.035.

20.

Krewski

Jerrett

Burnett

R.T.

Hughes

Shi

, (2009). Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. HEI Research Report, 140, Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA.

21.

Muller

N.Z.

(2011). “Linking policy to statistical uncertainty in air pollution damages.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis &Policy 11(1): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2925.

22.

Muller

N.Z.

(2014). “Boosting GDP growth by accounting for the environment: Including air pollution and greenhouse gas damages increases estimated U.S. growth.” Science 345(6199): 873-874. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253506.

23.

Muller

N. Z.

Mendelsohn

(2007). “Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.002.

24.

Muller

N.Z.

Mendelsohn

(2009). “Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right.” American Economic Review 99(5): 1714-39. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.5.1714.

25.

National Academies of Science, National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Hidden Costs of Energy: Un-priced Consequences of Energy Production and Use. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA.

26.

National Economic Research Associates (NERA). (1993). External costs of electric utility resource selection in Nevada. Final report, Prepared for the Nevada Power Company, Cambridge, MA.

27.

North Dakota Pipeline Authority . (2015). Crude Oil Gathering In North Dakota, November 10.

28.

Parry

I.W.H.

Walls

Harrington

(2007). “Automobile Externalities and Policies.” Journal of Economic Literature 45(2): 373-399. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.2.373.

29.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (2015). Final Regulatory Impact Analysis [Docket No. PHMSA-2012-0082] (HM-251) Hazardous Materials: Enhanced Tank Car Standards and Operational Controls for High-Hazard Flammable Trains; Final Rule. Office of Hazardous Material Safety, May.

30.

Smith

C.E.

(2014). “Crude oil pipeline growth, revenues surge; construction costs mount.” Oil &Gas Journal 112(9): 114125.

31.

Smith

(2017). “With Big Spill to Clean, Pipeline Owner Seeks Keystone XL Approval.” New York Times November 17, 2017.

32.

Surface Transportation Board . (2014). EP 724 - Rail Service Issues Reports.

33.

Surface Transportation Board . (2015). 2014 Surface Transportation Board Carload Waybill Sample Reference Guide, November 1, 2015.

34.

United States Department of Agriculture . (2015). Rail Service Challenges in the Upper Midwest: Implications for Agricultural Sectors—Preliminary Analysis of the 2013-2014 Situation.

35.

United States Department of State . (2014). Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the KEYSTONE XL PROJECT.

36.

U.S. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon (IWGSCC) (2013). Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866 (November 2013)

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB