Can the Composition of Energy Use in an Expanding Economy be Altered by Consumers’ Responses to Technological Change?

Abstract

Technological change is necessary for economies to grow and develop. This paper investigates how this technological change could be directed in order to simultaneously reduce carbon-intensive energy use and deliver a range of economic benefits. Using both partial and general equilibrium modelling, we consider improvements in the efficiency in the delivery of electricity as an increasingly low carbon option in the UK. We demonstrate how linking this to policy action to assist and encourage households to substitute away from more carbon-intensive gas- to electricity-powered heating systems may change the composition of energy use, and implied emissions intensity, but not the level of the resulting economic expansion.

Keywords

Technological change;CGE models;multiple benefits;rebound

References

Armington

P.S.

(1969). “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” IMF Staff Papers 16(1): 159-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866403.

Blanchflower

D.G.

Oswald

A.J.

(1989). The Wage Curve. PUBLISHER ETC. MIT Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3181.

Broberg

T..

Berg

Samakovlis

(2015). “The economy-wide rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in Swedish industries: A general equilibrium analysis.” Energy Policy 83: 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.026.

Committee on Climate Change (2015). “Power sector scenarios for the fifth carbon budget.” https://www.theccc.org.uk/publications/.

Cui

C. X.

Hanley

McGregor

Swales

J.K.

Turner

Yin

Y.P.

(2017). “Impacts of regional productivity growth, decoupling and pollution leakage.” Regional Studies 51(9): 1324-1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1167865.

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (DBEIS) (2016). Coal Generation in Great Britain. The Pathway to a Low-Carbon Future. Consultation Document.

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (DBEIS) (2017). “Industrial Strategy: Building a Britain Fit for the Future.” White Paper. December 2017.

European Commission (EC) (2011). Commission Staff Working Paper Impact Assessment, Accompanying the document Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC, SEC(2011) 779 final, Brussels, 22.6.2011.

Figus

Swales

J.K.

Turner

(2018). “Can private motor vehicle-augmenting technical progress reduce household and total fuel use?” Ecological Economics 146: 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.005.

10.

Figus

Swales

J.K

(2018). “Can vehicle efficiency beat fuel efficiency in cutting fuel use?” Discussion paper, 18-02, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

11.

Gibson

(1990). “Export competitiveness and UK sales of Scottish manufactures.” Paper presented at the Scottish Economists’ Conference, The Burn, Scotland.

12.

Gillingham

Rapson

Wagner

(2016). “The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10 (1): 68-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev017.

13.

Greening

Greene

D.L.

Difiglio

(2000). “Energy efficiency and consumption: The rebound effect—a survey.” Energy Policy 28(6-7): 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5.

14.

Hanley

McGregor

Swales

J.K.

Turner

(2009). “Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability?” Ecological Economics 68: 692-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.004.

15.

Harris

R.I.D.

(1989) The Growth and Structure of the UK Regional Economy 1963-85. Aldershot: Avebury.

16.

Holden

Swales

J.K.

(1993). “Factor Subsidies, Employment Generation, and Cost per Job: A Partial Equilibrium Approach.” Environment and Planning A 25(3): 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1068/a250317.

17.

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2014). Capturing the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency: A Guide to Quantifying the Value Added. IEA, Paris.

18.

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015). World Energy Outlook 2015. OECD/IEA, Paris.

19.

Jorgenson

D.W.

(1963). “Capital Theory and Investment Behavior.” The American Economic Review 53(2): 247-259.

20.

Layard

Nickell

Jackman

(1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

21.

Lecca

McGregor

P.G.

Swales

J.K.

Turner

(2014). “The Added Value of a General Equilibrium Analysis of Increased Efficiency in Household Energy Use.” Ecological Economics 100: 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecole-con.2014.01.008.

22.

Ofgem (2016). The Decarbonisation of Heat. Ofgem’s Future Insights Series, November 2016.

23.

Ofgem (2017). State of the Energy Market: 2017 Report, available to download at https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/system/files/docs/2017/10/state_of_the_market_report_2017_web_1.pdf.

24.

Revkin

(2014). “Is There Room for Agreement on the Merits and Limits of Efficient Lighting?” New York Times, 21 October 2014.

25.

Saunders

H.D.

(2015). “The unexploited potential for natural gas to greatly increase energy efficiency.” Energy Efficiency 8(2): 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-014-9293-3.

26.

Sorrell

Dimitropoulos

Sommerville

(2009). “Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review.” Energy Policy 27(4): 3115-3129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.004.

27.

Turner

(2009). “Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy.” Energy Economics 31:648-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.01.008.

28.

UNEP (2014). Chapter 4, The Emissions Gap Report 2014, UNEP, Nairobi.