Does Global Value Chain Participation Decouple Chinese Development from CO2 Emissions? A Structural Decomposition Analysis

Abstract

Decoupling economic activities and CO2 emissions is central to achieving the climate goals of China. The country’s participation in global value chains has profound impacts on its economy as well as CO2 emissions. Assessing the impacts is fundamental to identifying strategies to decouple China’s development from emissions. To this end, we adopt the multi-region structural decomposition analysis technique to quantify the global value chain determinants of China’s CO2 emission intensity from both the production and consumption perspectives. It is found that China’s decoupling from emissions in 2007-2012 was driven mainly by global value chains. Nonetheless the decoupling slowed down after the global financial crisis. In particular, the value chains within China played a more important role in greening Chinese economy. Despite the considerable improvement in 2007-2012, global value chains remained the primary obstacle to environmental sustainability of China. More detailed results with policy implications are presented.

Keywords

Global value chains CO2 emissions Decoupling China Structural decomposition analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arto

Dietzenbacher

(2014). “Drivers of the Growth in Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Environmental science &technology 48: 5388-5394. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5005347.

Boden

T.A.

Marland

Andres

R.J.

(2017). “Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions.” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A., doi 10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2017

Croner

Frankovic

(2018). “A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Global and National Energy Intensity Trends.” The Energy Journal 39: 103-122. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.2.dcro.

de Boer

(2009a). “Generalized Fisher index or Siegel-Shapley decomposition?” Energy Economics 31: 810-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.03.003.

de Boer

(2009b). “Multiplicative Decomposition and Index Number Theory: An Empirical Application of the Sato-Vartia Decomposition.” Economic Systems Research 21: 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310902937638.

de Freitas

L.C.

Kaneko

(2011). “Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil.” Ecological Economics 70: 1459-1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.011.

de Vries

G.J.

Ferrarini

(2017). “What Accounts for the Growth of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Advanced and Emerging Economies? The Role of Consumption, Technology and Global Supply Chain Participation.” Ecological Economics 132: 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.001.

Deloitte (2015). “Carbon Analytics 2: Australia’s performance in the G20.” Deloitte Access Economics, UK.

Deutch

(2017). “Decoupling Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions.” Joule 1: 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.011.

10.

Dietzenbacher

Los

(1998). “Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity.” Economic Systems Research 10: 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319800000023.

11.

European Environment Agency (2007). “Total energy intensity-Outlook from EEA.” Copenhagen, Denmark.

12.

Fessehaie

Morris

(2018). “Global Value Chains and Sustainable Development Goals: What Role for Trade and Industrial Policies?” Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).

13.

Guan

Meng

Reiner

D.M.

Zhang

Shan

, (2018). “Structural decline in China’s CO2 emissions through transitions in industry and energy systems.” Nature Geoscience 11: 551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0161-1.

14.

Hoekstra

Michel

Suh

(2016). “The emission cost of international sourcing: using structural decomposition analysis to calculate the contribution of international sourcing to CO2 emission growth.” Economic Systems Research 28: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1166099.

15.

Huntington

H.G.

(2010). “Structural change and US energy use: recent patterns.” The Energy Journal 31: 25-39. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No3-2.

16.

Jackson

R.B.

Quéré

C.L.

Andrew

R.M.

Canadell

J.G.

Korsbakken

J.I.

Liu

, (2018). “Global energy growth is outpacing decarbonization.” Environmental Research Letters 13: 120401. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf303.

17.

Jiang

Guan

(2017). “The global CO2 emissions growth after international crisis and the role of international trade.” Energy Policy 109: 734-746. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2017.07.058.

18.

Kaltenegger

Loschel

Pothen

(2017). “The effect of globalisation on energy footprints: Disentangling the links of global value chains.” Energy Economics 68: 148-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.008.

19.

Le Quéeré

Andrew

R.M.

Friedlingstein

Sitch

Hauck

Pongratz

, (2018). “Global Carbon Budget 2018.” Earth System Science Data 10: 2141-2194.

20.

Lenzen

(2016). “Structural analyses of energy use and carbon emissions - an overview.” Economic Systems Research 28: 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2016.1170991.

21.

Matsumoto, K.i., Y. Shigetomi, H. Shiraki, Y. Ochi, Y. Ogawa, and T. Ehara (2019). “Addressing Key Drivers of Regional CO2 Emissions of the Manufacturing Industry in Japan.” The Energy Journal 40: 233-258. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.40.SI1.kmat.

22.

Meng

Guan

Shan

Song

Wei

Y.-M.

, (2017). “Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis.” Nature Communications 8: 1712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01820-w.

23.

Moreau

Vuille

(2018). “Decoupling energy use and economic growth: Counter evidence from structural effects and embodied energy in trade.” Applied Energy 215: 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.044.

24.

OECD (2002). “Sustainable development: Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth.” OECD Publishing, Paris.

25.

Owen

Steen-Olsen

Barrett

Wiedmann

Lenzen

(2014). “A structural decomposition approach to comparing MRIO databases.” Economic Systems Research 26: 262-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.935299.

26.

Rose

Casler

(1996). “Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Critical Appraisal.” Economic Systems Research 8: 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319600000003.

27.

Springmann

Zhang

Karplus

V.J.

(2015). “Consumption-Based Adjustment of Emissions-Intensity Targets: An Economic Analysis for China’s Provinces.” Environmental and Resource Economics 61: 615-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9809-5.

28.

Stephenson

(2016). “Trade Governance Frameworks in a World of Global Value Chains: Policy Options.” E15 Expert Group on Global Value Chains: Development Challenges and Policy Options-Policy Options Paper. E15 Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum.

29.

Ang

B.W.

(2015). “Multiplicative decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity change using input-output analysis.” Applied Energy 154: 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.101.

30.

Ang

B.W.

(2017). “Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities.” Energy Economics 65: 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.002.

31.

Ang

B.W.

(2019). “Structural path and decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities.” Energy Economics 83: 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.020.

32.

Tapio

(2005). “Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001.” Transport Policy 12: 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001.

33.

UNEP (2011). “Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth.” United Nations Environment Programme, Paris.

34.

UNIDO (2015). “Global value chains and development: UNIDO’s support towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development.” United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria.

35.

UNIDO (2018). “Global value chains and industrial development: lessons from China, South-East and South Asia.” United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria.

36.

United Nations (1999). “Handbook of input-output table compilation and analysis.” United Nations, New York.

37.

Wang

Ang

B.W.

(2018). “Assessing the role of international trade in global CO2emissions: An index decomposition analysis approach.” Applied Energy 218: 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.180.

38.

Wang

Ang

B.W.

(2017a). “Assessing drivers of economy-wide energy use and emissions: IDA versus SDA.” Energy Policy 107: 585-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.034.

39.

Wang

Ang

B.W.

(2017b). “A multi-region structural decomposition analysis of global CO2 emission intensity.” Ecological Economics 142: 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.023.

40.

Wang, $., B.W. Ang, and B. Su (2017c). “Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of energy and emission intensities: Some methodological issues.” Energy 123: 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.141.

41.

Wang

Ang

B.W.

Zhou

(2018). “Decomposing aggregate CO2 emission changes with heterogeneity: An extended production-theoretical approach.” The Energy Journal 39: 59-79. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.1.hwan.

42.

Wang

Zhou

(2018). “Multi-country comparisons of CO2 emission intensity: The production-theoretical decomposition analysis approach.” Energy Economics 74: 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1016zj.eneco.2018.05.038.

43.

Wang

Zhou

Xie

B.-C.

Zhang

(2019). “Assessing drivers of CO2 emissions in China’s electricity sector: A metafrontier production-theoretical decomposition analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 275: 1096-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.008.

44.

Wang

Wei

S.-J.

Zhu

(2017d). “Characterizing Global Value Chains: Production Length and Upstreamness.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 23261. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23261.

45.

Wang

Wei

S.-J.

Zhu

(2017e). “Measures of Participation in Global Value Chains and Global Business Cycles.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 23222. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23222.

46.

Wiedmann

Lenzen

(2018). “Environmental and social footprints of international trade.” Nature Geoscience 11: 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0113-9.

47.

World Bank, WTO, IDE-JETRO, OECD, UIBE (2017). “Global Value Chain Development Report 2017: Measuring and analyzing the impact of gvcs on economic development.” The World Bank Group, Washington DC, the United States.

48.

Dietzenbacher

(2014). “A structural decomposition analysis of the emissions embodied in trade.” Ecological Economics 101: 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.015.

49.

Zeng

Liang

Zeng

Zhang

(2014). “Revisiting drivers of energy intensity in China during 1997-2007: A structural decomposition analysis.” Energy Policy 67: 640-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.053.

50.

Zhang

Lahr

M.L.

(2014). “Can the Carbonizing Dragon Be Domesticated? Insights from a Decomposition of Energy Consumption and Intensity in China, 1987-2007.” Economic Systems Research 26: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953 5314.2014.880663.