Understanding Hourly Electricity Demand: Implications for Load,Welfare and Emissions

Abstract

n this study, using hourly data from a representative sample of Swedish households on standard tariffs, we investigate the welfare and emission implications of moving to a mandatory dynamic pricing scheme. We allow demand during different hours of a day to affect utility differently, and account for the derived nature of electricity demand by explicitly accounting for the services (end-use demands) that drive hourly electricity demand. We use the flexible Exact Affine Stone Index (EASI) demand system, which accommodates both observed and unobserved heterogeneity in preferences, to understand changes in load consequent to hourly retail pricing. Our findings suggest that, following hourly retail pricing, changes in load patterns across hours are relatively small: total load changes by less than one percent. There are correspondingly small reductions in welfare and carbon emissions, of less than 0.2 percent and 0.47 percent, respectively. Overall, in the context of a decentralized, competitive retail electricity market-setting, our results suggest that the benefits to ensuring that the retail price of electricity reflects the hourly marginal cost is small, at least in the short run.

Keywords

Appliance holdings Electricity Energy demand Demand system Dynamic pricing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allcott

(2011). “Rethinking real-time electricity pricing.” Resource and Energy Economics 33(4): 820–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.06.003.

Astaneh

M.F.

Chen

(2013). “Price volatility in wind dominant electricity markets.” EUROCON, 2013 IEEE770-776.https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROCON.2013.6625070.

Atkinson

S.E.

(1979). “Responsiveness to time-of-day electricity pricing: First empirical results.” Journal of Econometrics 9(1-2): 9–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(79)90097-6.

Bigerna

Bollino

C.A.

(2015). “A System of Hourly Demand in the Italian Electricity Market.” The Energy Journal 36(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.4.sbig.

Bӧhringer

(2017). “Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Promotion in Germany.” The Energy Journal 38(SI1). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.SI1.cboh.

Borenstein

(2005). “The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing.” The Energy Journal 26(3): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VOL26-NO3-5.

Borenstein

(2007). “Customer risk from real-time retail electricity pricing: Bill volatility and hedgability.” The Energy Journal 111–130. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No2-5.

Borenstein

(2007). “Wealth transfers among large customers from implementing real-time retail electricity pricing.” The Energy Journal 131–149. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No2-6.

Borenstein

(2013). “Effective and equitable adoption of opt-in residential dynamic electricity pricing.” Review of Industrial Organization 42(2): 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-012-9367-3.

10.

Borenstein

Holland

S.P.

(2003). On the efficiency of competitive electricity markets with time-invariant retail prices. Tech. rep. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9922.

11.

Borenstein

Davis

L.W.

. “The equity and efficiency of two-part tariffs in US natural gas markets.” The Journal of Law and Economics 55(1): 75- 128. https://doi.org/10.1086/661958.

12.

Broberg

Persson

(2016). “Is our everyday comfort for sale? Preferences for demand management on the electricity market.” Energy Economics 54: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.005.

13.

Castellón

C.E.

Boonsaeng

Carpio

C.E.

(2015). “Demand system estimation in the absence of price data: An application of Stone-Lewbel price indices.” Applied Economics 47(6): 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.975332.

14.

Caves

D.W.

Christensen

L.R.

(1980). “Econometric analysis of residential time-of-use electricity pricing experiments.” Journal of Econometrics 14(3): 287- 306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(80)90029-9.

15.

Cochell

J.E.

Schwarz

P.M.

Taylor

T.N.

(2012). “Using real-time electricity data to estimate response to time-of-use and flat rates: an application to emissions.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 42(2): 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9190-7.

16.

Edgerton

D.L.

(1997). “Weak separability and the estimation of elasticities in multistage demand systems.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1): 62–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243943.

17.

Energimarknadsinspektionen (2010). “Increased influence for customers in the electricity mar- ket: Hourly metering for electricity consumers with subscriptions of up to 63 amps (Swedish title: Ӧkat inflytande ӧr på elmarknaden: Timmätning fӧr- der med abonnemang om ӧ 63 ampere).” EiR 22.

18.

Energimarknadsinspektionen (2012). “A model for exchanges of information and the need for centralized administration of metering data (Swedish title: Framtida modell for informationsutbyte och behov av centraliserad matvardeshantering).” EiR.

19.

Energimarknadsinspektionen (2014). “Follow up on the hourly metering reform (Swedish title: Uppfӧljning av timmätnings-reformen).” EiR 05.

20.

Energimarknadsinspektionen (2016). “Measures for increased demand flexibility in the Swedish electricity system (Swedish title: ä fӧr ӧkad efterfrågeflexibilitet i det Svenska elsystemet).” EiR 15.

21.

Faruqui

Sergici

(2011). “Dynamic pricing of electricity in the mid-Atlantic region: econometric results from the Baltimore gas and electric company experiment.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 40(1): 82–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9152-5.

22.

Fell

Paul

(2014). “A new look at residential electricity demand using household expenditure data.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 33: 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.02.001.

23.

Filippini

(1995). “Swiss residential demand for electricity by time-of-use.” Resource and Energy Economics 17(3): 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-7655(95)00005-I.

24.

Gambardella

Pahle

Schill

W.-P.

(2019). “Do Benefits from Dynamic Tariffing Rise? Welfare Effects of Real-Time Retail Pricing Under Carbon Taxation and Variable Renewable Electricity Supply.” Environmental and Resource Economics 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00393-0.

25.

Hoderlein

Mihaleva

(2008). “Increasing the price variation in a repeated cross section.” Journal of Econometrics 147(2): 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2008.09.022.

26.

Holland

S.P.

Mansur

E.T.

(2006). “The short-run effects of time-varying prices in competitive electricity markets.” The Energy Journal 127–155. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol27-No4-6.

27.

Holland

S.P.

Mansur

E.T.

(2008). “Is real-time pricing green? The environmental impacts of electricity demand variance.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3): 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.3.550.

28.

Horowitz

Lave

(2014). “Equity in residential electricity pricing.” The Energy Journal 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.2.1.

29.

IVA (2016). Five different routes for Sweden: Electricity crossroads (Swedish title: Vägval el: Fem vägval for Sveriges ut-veckling). Tech. rep. The Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences.

30.

Jessoe

Rapson

. “Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use.” American Economic Review 104(4): 1417–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1417.

31.

Ketterer

J.C.

(2014). “The impact of wind power generation on the electricity price in Germany.” Energy Economics 44: 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.003.

32.

Léautier

T.-O.

(2014). “Is mandating” smart meters” smart?” The Energy Journal 135–157. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.4.6.

33.

Lewbel

(1989). “Identification and estimation of equivalence scales under weak separability.” The Review of Economic Studies 56(2): 311–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297464.

34.

Lewbel

Pendakur

(2009). “Tricks with Hicks: The EASI demand system.” The American Economic Review 99(3): 827–863. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.827.

35.

Lewbel

Pendakur

(2017). “Unobserved preference heterogeneity in demand using generalized random coefficients.” Journal of Political Economy 125(4): 1100–1148. https://doi.org/10.1086/692808.

36.

Mountain

D.C.

Lawson

E.L.

(1992). “A disaggregated nonhomothetic modeling of responsiveness to residential time-of-use electricity rates.” International Economic Review 181–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526990.

37.

Nohlgren

(2014). “Electricity from new and future plats (Swdish title: El från nya och framtida anläggningar 2014).” Elforsk rapport 14: 40.

38.

Patrick

R.H.

Wolak

F. A.

(2002). “Real-time pricing and demand side participation in restructured electricity markets.” Electricity Pricing in Transition 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0833-5_23.

39.

Reiss

P.C.

White

M.W.

(2005). “Household electricity demand, revisited.” The Review of Economic Studies 72(3): 853–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00354.

40.

Savolainen

M.K.

Svento

(2012). “Real-time pricing in the Nordic power markets.” Energy economics 34(4): 1131–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.006.

41.

Schulte

Heindl

(2017). “Price and income elasticities of residential energy demand in Germany.” Energy Policy 102: 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.055.

42.

Simshauser

Downer

(2016). “On the inequity of flat-rate electricity tariffs.” The Energy Journal 37(3). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.3.psim.

43.

Smale

Van Vliet

Spaargaren

(2017). “When social practices meet smart grids: Flexibility, grid management, and domestic consumption in The Netherlands.” Energy Research & Social Science 34: 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.037.

44.

Strengers

(2016). “Peak electricity demand and social practice theories: Reframing the role of change agents in the energy sector.” Energy Policy 44: 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.046.

45.

Sweco (2016). Economic conditions for different production technologies (Swedish title: Ekonomiska forutsattningar for skilda kraftslag. Tech. rep. Sweco.

46.

Taylor

T.N.

Schwarz

P.M.

Cochell

J.E.

(2005). “24/7 hourly response to electricity real-time pricing with up to eight summers of experience.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 27(3): 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-6623-6.

47.

Vesterberg

(2016). “The hourly income elasticity of electricity.” Energy Economics 59: 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.08.014.

48.

Vesterberg

(2018). “The effect of price on electricity contract choice.” Energy Economics 69: 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.039.

49.

Vesterberg

Krishnamurthy

C.K.B.

(2016). “Residential end-use electricity demand: Implications for real time pricing in Sweden.” The Energy Journal 37(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37Amves.

50.

Wolak

F.A.

(2017). “Efficient pricing: the key to unlocking readical innovation in the electricity sector.” OECD working paper.

51.

Woo

C.-K.

(2011). “The impact of wind generation on the electricity spot-market price level and variance: The Texas experience.” Energy Policy 39(7): 3939–3944. https://doi.org/10.10167j.enpol.2011.03.084.

52.

Yohanis

Y.G.

(2008). “Real-life energy use in the UK: How occupancy and dwelling characteristics affect domestic electricity use.” Energy and Buildings 40(6): 1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.09.001.

53.

Zimmermann

J.P.

(2009). End-use metering campaign in 400 households in Sweden: assessment of the potential electricity savings. Tech. rep. Energimyndigheten.

54.

Zivin

J.S.G.

Kotchen

M.J.

Mansur

E.T.

(2014). “Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions: Implications for electric cars and other electricity-shifting policies.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 107: 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjebo.2014.03.010.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB