This research reports the results of cointegration tests between natural gas spot prices at various production fields, pipeline hubs, and city markets. Cointegration between prices is evidence that spatial arbitrage is enforcing the law of one price across market locations. The results show that prices at certain city markets, Chicago and to a lesser extent California, are cointegrated with prices at field markets. However, the prices at most other locations do not move in step with gas prices in the field markets. Customer access to pipeline transportation, or competitive bypass, may explain why prices at some city markets are more responsive to production field prices than others.
BoxG.PierceD.A. (1976). “Distribution of residual autocorrelations in autoregressive-integrated moving average models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association65: 1509-1526.
2.
BroadmanH.G.KaltJ.P. (1989). “How natural is monopoly? The case of bypass in natural gas distribution markets.” Yale Journal on Regulation6: 181-208.
3.
CharemzaW.W.DeadmanD.F. (1992). New Directions in Econometric Practice. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.
4.
De VanyA.S.WallsW.D. (1993). “Pipeline access and market integration in the natural gas industry: Evidence from cointegration tests.” The Energy Journal14(4): 1-19.
5.
De VanyA.S.WallsW.D. (1994a). “Network connectivity and price convergence: Gas pipeline deregulation.” Research in Transportation Economics, forthcoming.
6.
De VanyA.S.WallsW.D. (1994b). “Open access and the emergence of a competitive natural gas market.” Contemporary Economic Policy12: 77-96.
7.
DickeyD.A.FullerW.A. (1979). “Distribution of the estimators of autoregressive time series with a unit root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association74: 427-431.
8.
DoaneM.J.SpulberD.F. (1992). “Open access and the evolution of the U.S. spot market for gas.” Invited paper, International Association for Energy Economics, 14th Annual North American Conference.
9.
EngleR.F.GrangerC.W.J. (1987). “Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing.” Econometrica55: 251-276.
10.
GrangerC. (1986). “Developments in the study of cointegrated random variables.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics68: 213-228.
11.
LjungG.BoxG. (1978). “On a measure of lack of fit in time series models.” Biometrika67: 297-303.
12.
LutkepohlH. (1991). Introduction to Multivariate Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13.
LyonT.P.TomanM.A. (1991). “Designing price caps for gas distribution systems.” Journal of Regulatory Economics3: 175-192.
14.
MacAvoyP.W.SpulberD.F.StangleB.E. (1989). “Is competitive entry free? Bypass and partial deregulation in natural gas markets.” Yale Journal on Regulation6: 209-247.
15.
MacKinnonJ. (1990). “Critical values for cointegration tests.” Working paper, University of California, San Diego.
