Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment

Abstract

The transition to competitive wholesale and retail markets for electricity in the U.S. has been a difficult and contentious process. This paper examines the progress that has been made in the evolution of wholesale and retail electricity market institutions. Various indicia of the performance of these market institutions are presented and discussed. Significant progress has been made on the wholesale competition front but major challenges must still be confronted. The framework for supporting retail competition has been less successful, especially for small customers. Empirical evidence suggests that well-designed competitive market reforms have led to performance improvements in a number of dimensions and benefited customers through lower retail prices.

Keywords

Electricity markets wholesale retail US Market power competition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borenstein

(2000). “The Trouble with Electricity Markets: Understanding California’s Restructuring Disaster.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1): 191-211 .

Borenstein

Bushnell

Wolak

(2002). “Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Restructured Wholesale Electricity Markets.” American Economic Review 92(5): 1376-1405.

Bushnell

Wolfram

(2005). “Ownership Changes, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generating Plants.” March. University of California Center for the Study of Energy Markets, CSEM WP-140.

Chao

Wilson

(1987). “Priority Service: Pricing, Investment and Market Organization.” American Economic Review (77): 899-916.

Cramton

Stoft

(2005). “A Capacity Market that Makes Sense.” Working Paper, University of Maryland. March, http://www.cramton.umd.edu/papers2005-2009/cramton-stoft-a-capacity-market-that-makes-sense.pdf

Domah

P.D.

Pollitt

M.G.

(2001). “The Restructuring and Privatisation of the Regional Electricity Companies in England and Wales: A social cost benefit analysis,” Fiscal Studies, 22(1):107-146.

Edison Electric Institute (EEIa) (various years), Annual Statistics of the Electric Utility Industry, Washington, D.C.

Edison Electric Institute (EEIb) (various years), Capacity and Generation from Non-Utility Sources (1986-1993) Washington, D.C.

Hirst

(2004). “U.S. Transmission Capacity: Present Status and Future Prospects.” Washington, D.C., Edison Electric Institute. October. http://www.eei.org/industry_issues/energy_infrastructure/transmission/USTransCapacity10-18-04.pdf .

10.

Hogan

(1992). “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission.” Journal of Regulatory Economics (4): 211-242.

11.

ISO New England (2004). “Final Report on Electricity Supply Conditions in New England During the January 14-16, 2004 Cold Snap.” October, http://www.iso-ne.com .

12.

ISO New England (2005). “2004 Annual Markets Report.” http://www.iso-ne.com/markets/mkt_anlys_rpts/annl_mkt_rpts/2004/2004_annual_markets_report.doc.

13.

Joskow

P.L.

(1974). “Inflation and Environmental Concern: Change in the Process of Public Utility Price Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 17(2): 291-387.

14.

Joskow

P.L.

(1989). “Regulatory Failure, Regulatory Reform and Structural Change In The Electric Power Industry.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics. 125-199.

15.

Joskow

P.L.

(1997). “Restructuring, Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 119-138.

16.

Joskow

P.L.

(2000a). “Deregulation and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electric Power Sector.” Deregulation of Network Industries: The Next Steps. ( Peltzman

Winston

Clifford

, eds.). Washington, D.C., Brookings Press.

17.

Joskow

P.L.

(2001). “California’s Electricity Crisis.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17(3): 365 388.

18.

Joskow

P.L.

(2005a). “The Difficult Transition to Competitive Electricity Markets in the United States.” Electricity Deregulation: Where To From Here? ( Griffin

Puller

, eds.) , Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

19.

Joskow

P.L.

(2005b). “Transmission Policy in the United States.” Utilities Policy (13): 95-115.

20.

Joskow

P.L.

(2005c) “Patterns of Transmission Investment.” Mimeo. http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=1133

21.

Joskow

P.L.

Kahn

(2002). “A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000.” The Energy Journal 23(4):1-35.

22.

Joskow

P.L.

Schmalensee

(1983). Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation, Cambridge,. MIT Press.

23.

Joskow

P.L.

Tirole

(2000). “Transmission Rights and Market Power on Electric Power Networks.” Rand Journal of Economics 31(3): 450.

24.

Joskow

P. L.

Tirole

(2005a). “Merchant Transmission Investment.” Journal of Industrial Economics 53(2): 233-264.

25.

Joskow

P.L.

Tirole

(2005b). “Reliability and Competitive Electricity Markets.” September, (revise d). http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=917

26.

Markiewicz

Rose

Wolfram

(2004). “Does Competition Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Competition on U.S. Electric Generation Efficiency.” Cambridge, MIT CEEPR Discussion Paper WP-2004-018. http://web.mit.edu/ceepr/www/2004-018.pdf

27.

Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (2005). “2005 Electric Power Customer Migration Data.” http://www.mass.gov/Eoca/docs/doer/pub_info/0505.xls.

28.

New York ISO (2005). “2004 State of the Markets Report,” prepared by David Patton. July, http://www.nyiso.com/public/webdocs/documents/market_advisor_reports/2004_patton_final_report.pdf .

29.

Newbery

Pollitt

(1997). “The Restructuring and Privatization of the CEGB: Was it Worth It?” Journal of Industrial Economics 45(3): 269-303.

30.

PJM Interconnection (2005). State of the Market Report 2004. March. http://www.pjm.com/markets/market-monitor/downloads/mmu-reports/pjm-som-2004.pdf .

31.

Public Utility Commission of Texas (2005). “June 2005 Report Card on Retail Competition.” http://www.puc.state.tx.us/electric/reports/RptCard/rptcrd/June05rptcrd.pdf.

32.

Stigler

Friedland

(1962). “What Can Regulators Regulate: The Case of Electricity.” Journal of Law and Economics (5): 1-16.

33.

Synapse Energy Economics (2004). “Electricity Prices in PJM.” June, Cambridge, MA, http://wwwm.com/documents/downloads/reports/synapse-report-pjm-electricity-prices.pdf.pj.

34.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIAa) (various issues), Electric Power Monthly, March. Washington, D.C.

35.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIAb) (various issues), Electric Power Annual, Washington, D.C.

36.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIAc) (various issues), Monthly Energy Review, Washington, D.C.

37.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIAd) (various issues), Annual Energy Review, Washington, D.C.

38.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2005), State Level Data Spreadsheets, Washington, D.C. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sprdshts.html.

39.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2004). “Electricity Transmission in a Restructured Industry: Data Needs for Public Policy Analysis.” December, D0E/EIA-00639. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oss/TransmissionDataNeeds-DH.pdf .

40.

U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (2005). “2004 State of the Markets Report.” Office of Market Oversight and Investigations. June. http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/Files/20050615093455-06-15-05-som2004.pdf .

41.

Van Doren

Taylor

(2004). “Rethinking Electricity Restructuring,” Policy Analysis Paper No. 530. Cato Institute, Washington, D.C.

42.

Wolfram

C.D.

(1999). “Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market,” American-Economic Review 89: 805-826.