This paper studies the impacts of state level residential building codes on per capita residential electricity consumption. We construct a timeline of when individual states first implemented residential building codes. Using panel data for 48 US states from 1970-2006, we exploit the temporal and spatial variation of building code implementation and issuance of building permits to identify the effect of the regulation on residential electricity consumption. Controlling for the effect of prices, income, and weather, we show that states that adopted building codes followed by a significant amount of new construction have experienced detectable decreases in per capita residential electricity consumption—ranging from 0.3-5% in the year 2006. Estimates are larger in states where codes are more stringent and more strictly enforced.
ArellanoM.BondS.R. (1991). “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations.” Reviews of Economics Studies58: 277-298.
4.
AroonruengsawatAninMaximilianAuffhammer (2011). “Impacts of Climate Change on Residential Electricity Consumption: Evidence From Billing Data.” In The Economics Of Climate Change: Adaptations Past and Present, Gary Libecap and Richard H. Steckel, editors. University of Chicago Press.
5.
BaltagiB.H.GriffinJ.M. (1997). “Pooled estimators vs. their heterogeneous counterparts in the context of dynamic demand for gasoline.” Journal of Econometrics77: 303-327.
6.
BaltagiBadi H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data. 2nd edition: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Baltagi, B.H., G. Bresson and A. Pirotte (2002). “Comparison of forecast performance for homogeneous, heterogeneous and shrinkage estimators: Some empirical evidence from US electricity and natural-gas consumption.” Economic Letters76: 375-382.
7.
BerndtErnst R. (1996). The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. Addison Wesley. Bion, Howard and William Prindle (1991). Better Building Codes Through Energy Efficiency. Washington, D.C.: Alliance to Save Energy.
8.
BrookesLen (1990). “The Greenhouse Effect: The Fallacies in the Energy Efficiency Solution.” Energy Policy18(2): 199-201 Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP) (2009). Code Status and maps. http://bcap-energy.org/node/5
9.
Building Codes Assistance Project (2008). Residential Building Energy Codes—Enforcement & Compliance Study. Prepared for and funded by the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association, October.
10.
Bureau of Economic Analysis (2009). State annua. tables, Washington, D.C.: Department of commerce.
11.
California Energy Commission (2007). “California Energy Demand 2008-2018” CEC Report 200-2007-015-SF2.
12.
ChongHoward (2011). “Building Vintage and Electricity Use: Old Homes Use Less Electricity In Hot Weather.” UC Berkeley CUDARE Mimeo.
13.
CostaDora L. and Matthew E. Kahn (2010). “Why has California’s Residential Electricity Consumption been so flat since the 1980s? A Microeconometric Approach.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Number 15978.
14.
DahlCarol (1993). A Survey of Energy Demand Elasticities in Support of the Development of the NEMS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
15.
Energy Information Administration (2008). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases Report. EIA Report #D0E/EIA-0573(2007)
16.
Energy Information Administration (2009). State Energy Data System http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/_seds.html.
17.
GellerHoward (1995). National Appliance Efficiency Standards: Cost-Effective FederalRegulations. American Council for an Energy-Efficienc. Economy, Washington, D.C.: Report A951
18.
GillinghamKennethNewellRichardPalmerKaren (2004). “Retrospective Examination of Demand-Side Energy Efficiency Policies.” Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
19.
GillinghamKennethNewellRichard G.PalmerKaren L. (2006). “Energy Efficiency Policies: A Retrospective Examination.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources31, November.
20.
HanemannW.M. (1984). Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 541-561.
21.
HorowitzM.J. (2007). Changes in electricity demand in the United States from the 1970s to 2003. The Energy Journal 28(3): 93-119.
22.
HorowitzMarvin J. (2004). “Electricity Intensity in the Commercial Sector: Market and Public Program Effects.” The Energy Journal25(2): 115-137.
23.
HouthakkerH.S. (1962). “Electricity Tariffs in Theory and Practice.” Electricity in the United States. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
24.
HouthakkerH.S.VerlegerP.K.SheehanD. (1974). “Dynamic demand for gasoline and residential electricity.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics56: 412-418.
25.
HsiaoC. (1986). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
JacobsenG.KotchenM.J.. (2010). “Are Building Codes Effective at Saving Energy? Evidence from Residential Billing Data in FLorida.” NBER Working Paper 16194.
27.
JonesTedNorlandDouglasPrindleWilliam (1998). “Opportunity Lost: Better Energy Codes For Affordable Housing and a Cleaner Environment.” Alliance to Save Energy. Washington D.C.
28.
KhazzoomD.J. (1980). “Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency Standards for Household Appliances.” The Energy Journal1(4): 21-39.
29.
LoughranDavid S. and Jonathan Kulick (2004). “Demand-side Management and Energy Efficiency in the United States.” The Energy Journal25(1): 19-42.
30.
MaddalaG.S.TrostR.P.LiH.JoutzF. (1997). “Estimation of short-run and long-run elasticities of energy demand from panel data using shrinkage estimators.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics15: 90-100.
31.
MarshallLynnGorinTomAuthorsPrincipal (2007). California Energy Demand 2008-2018—Staff Revised Forecast. California Energy Commission Staff Final Report #CEC-200-2007-015-SF2, November.
32.
MosenthalPhilipLoiterJeffrey (2007). National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency. Guide for Conducting Energy Efficiency Potential Studies. Prepared by Optimal Energy, Inc. www.epa.gov/eeactionplan
33.
NadelStevendeLaskiAndrewEldridgeMaggieKleishJim (2005). “Leading the Way: Continued Opportunities for New State Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards.” American Council for an Energy-Efficiency Economy and Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Washington D.C.: Report A051.
34.
NadelStevendeLaskiAndrewEldridgeMaggieKleischJim (2006). “Leading the Way: Continued Opportunities for New State Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards.” American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy and Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Washigton, D.C.:Report Number ASAP-6/ACEEE-A062.
35.
NOAA (2005). State heating and cooling degree days 1960-2000, Private communication to David Rich.
36.
PrindleWilliamDietschNikolassNealR.ElliottMartin KushlerLangerThereseNadelSteven (2003). “Energy Efficiency’s Next Generation Innovation at the State Level.” American Council for an Energy-EfficientEconomy, Washington, D.C.: Report No. E031.
37.
SanstadAlan H. (2007). “The Evaluation of Residential Utility Demand-Side Management Programs in California.” In Richard D. Morgenstern and William A. Pizer, Eds., Reality Check: The Nature and Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
38.
SanstadAlan H.Michael HanemannW.AuffhammerMaximilian (2006). “End-Use Energy Efficiency in a ‘Post-Carbon’ California Economy: Policy Issues and Research Frontiers.” In Alexander E. Farrell and W. Michael Hanemann, Eds., Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. San Francisco, California: The Energy Foundation.
39.
SaundersH. (1992). “The Khazzom-Brookes Postulate and Neo-classical Growth.” The Energy Journal13(4): 131-148.
40.
SudarshanA.SweeneyJ. (2008). Deconstructing the “Rosenfeld Curve”. Stanford PIEEWorking Paper Series.
41.
United States Census Bureau (2009). Housing Units Authorized by Building Permits. http://www.census.gov/const/www/C40/table2.html
42.
WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press.
