Controlled Synthesis of TiO 2 Hierarchical Nanofibre Structures via Electrospinning and Solvothermal Processes: Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Methylene Blue

Abstract

The present article describes a new titanium oxide-based (TiO₂) photocatalyst that shows promise for acceleration of dye degradation. A hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructure comprising nanorods on-nanofibres has been prepared using a sol-gel route and electrospinning. Calcination of electrospun nanofibre mats was performed in air at 500 °C. The TiO₂ nanofibre surface was then exploited as a ‘seeding ground’ to grow TiO₂ nanorods by a solvothermal process in NaOH. The nanofibres had a diameter of approximately 100 nm while the nanorods were evenly distributed on the nanofibre surface with a mean diameter of around 50–80 nm. The hierarchical nanostructure showed enhanced photocatalytic activity when compared to pure TiO₂ nanofibres. This improved efficiency in degrading methylene blue through the photocatalytic process was attributed to the larger specific surface area of the TiO₂ nanostructures, as well as high surface-to-volume ratio and higher reactive surface resulting in enhanced surface adsorption and interfacial redox reaction.

Keywords

titanium oxide hierarchical nanostructures photocatalysts electrospinning

1. Introduction

Many developing and developed nations are faced with a tremendous set of environmental problems related to the remediation of hazardous wastes, contaminated groundwaters and the control of toxic air contaminants. Groundwater contamination is one of the primary sources of human contact with toxic chemicals emanating from the textile and dyestuff manufacturing industry. Estimates indicate that approximately 15–20% of the synthetic textile dyes used are lost in wastewater streams during manufacturing or processing operations.1 Water contamination by methylene blue and similar dyes is a major environmental concern.^2,3 Some azo dyes and their degradation products, such as aromatic amines, are highly carcinogenic.⁴ Proper treatment of the dye plant effluent is thus a matter of concern before discharge. This requires an innovation of the best technology, which can be efficiently used for the removal and remediation of dyes. Different approaches have been used for remediation of water contamination by dyestuffs. These approaches include: use of super absorbent polymer (SAP), filtration, flocculation, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, membrane separation, adsorption on a high surface area activated carbon^5–6 and photocatalytic oxidation by semiconductors.

Photocatalytic oxidation of dyes using titanium oxide is the most promising technology among the different methods. A significant contribution to this technology is attributed to the pioneering work of Matthews et al.⁷ who have researched extensively photocatalytic destruction of organic contaminants in water. Due to the potentiality of photocatalysis, there has been continued intensive research undertaken in recent years to enhance its effectiveness.^8–12 Despite this research enhancing the efficiency to meet practical application requirements is still a challenge. Part of the problem is the poor quantum yield caused by the rapid recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes.¹³ In addition, TiO₂ has primarily been used in particulate form, which suffers loss of particles during photocatalytic application.¹⁴ Various methods have been formulated to resolve these problems, such as foreign element doping,¹⁵ immobilization of TiO₂ on substrates^16–17 and development of advanced materials with hierarchical nanostructures.¹⁸

Synthesis of hierarchical nanostructures with controllable sizes, shapes and compositions has received increased attention in recent years.¹⁹ These complex architectures, especially those based on one-dimensional nanostructures, are expected to display novel functions important to the development of advanced devices and systems. Recent examples include hierarchically structured nanowires (e.g., nanowire-on-nanowire, nanorod on-nanofibre) of ZnO/In₂O₃, SnO, ZnO, SnO₂-doped In₂O₃, GaP/Ga(As)-P, SnO₂/Fe₂O₃, SnO₂/TiO₂ and TiO₂/V₂O₅ hierarchical.¹⁹ Such advances in complex architectures may hold the key to highly efficient photocatalysts useful in the degradation of environmental contaminants. An advantage of using TiO₂ nanofibres and/or hierarchical nanostructures as opposed to particulate films is that they enable more efficient charge separation due to the absence of grain boundaries typical in particulate films.²⁰

The present study examines the potential to employ hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures, with a large aspect ratio, as photocatalysts for the degradation of methylene blue. We demonstrate for the first time successful growth of TiO₂ nanorods on the surface of TiO₂ nanofibres by combining sol-gel, electrospinning and solvothermal methods. For the first time, we show that these hierarchical nanostructures exhibit superior photocatalytic efficiency over pure TiO₂ nanofibres in the decolouration of methylene blue.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1 Electrospinning of TiO₂ nanofibres

Raw materials for fabrication included analytical reagent (AR) grade NaOH pellets, dimethyl-n'n-formamide (DMF), chloroform (CHCl₃), ammonium hydroxide solution, polyvinyl pyrollydone (PVP) and titanium isopropoxide (Ti (Iso)), all from Sigma Aldrich Pty. Ltd. Sydney, Australia. Briefly, a sol–gel composed of Ti (Iso) and PVP was prepared as follows: 1.2 g of PVP was dissolved in DMF/CHCl3 solvent mixture in a 2:1 ratio to make a 13 wt% solution, followed by addition of 0.5 g of Ti (Iso). The resulting mixture was stirred and then few drops (3–5) of ammonia solution were added to induce hydrolysis and condensation of the sol. A high voltage power supply (D-ES50PN-5W/DDPM, Gamma High Voltage Research Inc, Ormond Beach, FL) was used as a source of electric field with an applied voltage of 20 kV and nozzle to collector distance of 20 cm. The sol–gel was supplied through a plastic syringe attached to a capillary tip with a solution pump rate of 0.30 ml/h. A copper wire originating from the positive electrode (anode) was attached to the needle and a negative electrode (cathode) was attached to a metallic collector covered with aluminium foil. The resulting fibres were heat treated to 500 ^oC in air at 10 ^oC/min and held at that temperature for 3 h before allowing to cool at 10 ^oC/min using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Lindberg/Blue M Mini-Mite Tube Furnace (Scoresby, Victoria, Australia).

2.2 Solvothermal synthesis of TiO₂ nanorods on nanofibre surface

TiO₂ hierarchical structures were fabricated through a solvothermal reaction between NaOH solution and the mixture of TiO₂. In a typical synthesis, 0.5 g of TiO₂ nanofibres was added to 15 mL of 4 M NaOH aqueous solution. A 15 mL ethanol solvent was added to this solution followed by heating in a 50 mL Teflon lined autoclave at 150 °C for 12 h. Three additional samples were prepared following the same procedure allowing the reaction to proceed for 0.5, 1.0 and 6.0h in the autoclave. The precipitate was washed with distilled water and absolute ethanol in that order, and then dried in air.

2.3 Morphology and microstructure analysis

Morphology and microstructure analysis was carried out using scanning (SUPRA-55VP-FEGSEM) and transmission electron microscopy (JEOL JEM 2100). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained with a Philips diffractometer using monochromatized Cu Kα radiation. The absorption edge of the TiO₂ was determined using a Varian UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere. The BET surface area of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures and TiO₂ nanofibre was obtained with nitrogen adsorption in a Micrometrics TriStar 3000 Surface Area and Porosity Analyser (Particle & Surface Sciences Pty. Limited, Gosford, New South Wales Australia). BET surface area was calculated from the BET plot. Pore-size distributions were calculated using the BJH model. The pore volume was measured at the single point of p/p₀ = 0.99. Helium gas was used for dead space measurements and nitrogen was employed as an adsorbate gas.

2.4 Photocatalytic study

Methylene blue (MB) was used to evaluate the photocatalytic activity of titanium oxide and the hierarchical nanostructure materials in response to UV and visible irradiation. The optical absorption peak of MB at 660 nm was chosen to monitor the photocatalytic degradation process. According to the Lambert-Beer law,²¹ the concentration of methylene blue solutions can be obtained from this characteristic absorption peak. The experiment was conducted according to the following procedure: 50 mg/L methylene blue solution was prepared to a 150 mL volume in a 200 mL beaker. To this solution, a 50 mg of dried nanofibre catalyst was dispersed to make a suspension. The concentration of the catalyst was set constant for all the experiments. The suspension was stirred in the dark for 1h to ensure the establishment of adsorption and desorption equilibrium of MB on the nanofibre surface. Subsequently the suspension was irradiated with simulated sunlight using an Atlas Suntest CPS⁺ instrument (Atlas Co., Chicago, IL) equipped with a 150W xenon lamp and a filter (coated quartz dish). The suspension was gently stirred throughout the course of the experiment to maintain its stability. At given intervals, 5 mL of the suspension was extracted and then centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15 min to separate the nanofibres from the supernatant. A Varian Cary 3E spectrophotometer (Varian Co., Mulgrave, Australia) was used to generate time-dependent absorbance changes of the supernatant at the wavelength between 400 and 800 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 SEM and TEM micrographs analyses

The overall morphology and a high-magnification SEM micrograph of the electrospun TiO₂ nanofibres can be seen in Figure 1A. The onset of the solvothermal reaction is shown in Figure 1B. It is observed from the SEM micrographs that the solvothermal titanium oxide product after further reaction time contains numerous flower-like aggregates (Figure 1C). These flower-like aggregates (Figure 1D, 1E) consist of high density nanorods with a diameter of 50–70 nm. The length of these nanorods can be modulated by controlling the reaction time. With the reaction time shorter than 0.5 h, only bare TiO₂ nanofibres were observed. With the reaction prolonged to 1.0 h, a layer of nanoparticles with a thickness of a few nanometres deposited on the surface of the TiO₂ nanofibres could be observed. When the reaction was allowed to proceed for 6 h, the nano-scale flower-like nanostructures nucleated from the particles on the nanofibre surface, but did not cover the surface completely. Extending the reaction to 12 h caused nano-scale flower-like nanostructures to grow into arrays of nanorods with a length of around 50–70 nm. The TEM micrograph (Fig. 1F) shows a nodular type of microstructure, indicating that the nanorods' growth started from homogenous nucleation of TiO₂ nanoparticles. This is consistent with the SEM micrograph in Figure 1B. The growth process of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures from solvothermal method is illustrated schematically by Scheme 1.

Figure 1.

SEM micrographs of TiO₂: (a) pure electrospun TiO₂, (b) 1 h solvothermal treatment showing TiO₂ particle nucleation on nanofibre surface. (C) Hierarchical TiO₂ after solvothermal treatment for 6 h showing the onset of nano-scale flower-like coverage of nanofibre surface, (D) for 12 h showing nano-scale flower-like nanostructures completely covering the nanofibre surface. (E) Expanded view of (D) showing the nanorod network, (F) TEM micrograph shows the microstructure of the nanorods.

Scheme 1.

Schematic illustration of the growth process of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures from solvothermal reaction.

When TiO₂ is reacted with NaOH solution, some of the Ti–O–H (and Ti–O–Ti) bonds are broken and this results in the formation of a layered structure of titanate.²² It is observed that the aspect ratio and length of the nanorods which gradually grow from the surface of TiO₂ particles are affected by the reaction time. During the process of solvothermal treatment, 1D TiO₂ polycrystals are formed on the nanofibre surface by anisotropic growth. The results show that, in the ethanol solvent medium, TiO₂ nanofibres can provide a source for the nucleation of particles, followed by the anisotropic growth of TiO₂ rods on the particle surface. This results in a hierarchical structure. It was also observed that the addition of NaOH aqueous solution for pH adjustment was important for the nanorod growth, as experiments with no NaOH did not yield hierarchical nanostructures as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

SEM micrograph of TiO₂ nanofibres after 12 h solvothermal treatment (no NaOH) showing formation of pores or dimples on fibre surfaces.

N₂ adsorption–desorption isotherms of the synthesized TiO₂ nanofibres and hierarchical nanostructures were measured using Micrometrics TriStar 3000 Surface Area and Porosity Analyser after the samples were degassed in a vacuum at 250 °C for 3 h. As can be seen from Table 1, the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructure sample exhibits better nitrogen adsorption than pure TiO₂ nanofibres which is reflected in the BET surface area. Table 1 summarizes the surface area data, with BET surface area, pore volume and pore diameter of hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures much higher than those of pure TiO₂ nanofibres. The surface area results are consistent with the higher degradation efficiency of methylene blue over hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures discussed in section 3.3.

Table 1.

Comparing surface area of hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures and pure TiO₂ nanofibres.

	BET (m²/g)	Pore Diameter (Å)	Pore Volume (cm³/g)
TiO₂ Nanofibres	52.43	44.67	0.0684
TiO₂ Hierarchical Nanostructures	94.01	58.94	0.1043

3.2 Optical spectroscopy and XRD studies of hierarchical titanium oxide nanofibres

Measurement of diffuse reflectance with a UV-visible spectrophotometer is a standard technique in the determination of the absorption properties of materials. This information can be used to estimate the band-gap energy (also referred to as the band gap) of semiconductor materials. Determination of the band gap from the measurement of the diffuse reflectance of a powder or fibrous sample is a standard technique,^23–24 UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures calcined at 500 °C is shown in Figure 3. Over the range of 350–400 nm an abrupt increase in the reflectance is observed which indicates the onset of the fundamental absorption edge. This is typical of titanium oxide and provides a clear indication of successful synthesis of the same. Based on reflectance spectra, the absorption edge was determined to occur at a frequency of ~ 385 nm. Using this absorption edge value, the band gap energy was estimated to be ~ 3.22 eV from the relationship of photon energy and frequency E=hν, where h is Planck's constant (6.626×10⁻³⁴ J s) and ν = c/λ; where c is the speed of light (2.998×108 ms⁻¹) and λ is the wavelength of light.

Figure 3.

UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures.

The structure of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructure was studied using the powder x-ray diffraction method. The samples were ground into fine powders and mounted on zero-background diffraction holders. The XRD analysis was completed from 10–70 degrees two-theta with a 0.02 degree step and a 1 second dwell. The XRD pattern of hierarchical TiO₂ is shown in Figure 4. The structure can be indexed to TiO₂ in the anatase-rutile mixed phase with the interplanar d-spacings indexed to 101, 103, 105, 200, 202, 204, 210, 211, 213, 220, 320 and 004 reflections. The broad diffraction peaks are due to crystallite size broadening resulting from the nanocrystalline particle size. The crystallite size ‘D’ was determined from the 103 peak in the XRD pattern (chosen for its high intensity) using the Debye-Scherrer formula²⁵

D = \frac{0.94 λ}{β cos θ},

where λ is the wavelength of CuK_α radiations (1.54 Å), β the full-width at half-maximum of the peak corresponding to the plane {1 0 3} and θ the angle obtained from 2θ value corresponding to the maximum intensity peak in the XRD pattern. The diameter of crystallite size of obtained TiO₂ particles was ~ 4 nm.

Figure 4.

XRD spectra of hierarchical titanium oxide nanofibres showing the mixed phase after solvothermal treatment. (A=Anatase, R=Rutile).

The background of the x-ray pattern (Figure 4) is flat, indicating that electrospun TiO₂ is crystalline. It is obvious that the nanostructures are polycrystalline titanium oxide (TiO₂) with a predominantly anatase crystal structure.

3.3 Photocatalytic evaluation

The UV-Vis spectral change of 50 mg L⁻¹ methylene blue as a function of irradiation time during the course of photodegradation by the TiO₂ and hierarchical TiO₂ nanofibre photocatalysts are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, respectively. The intensity was normalized with the initial value at the beginning of irradiation. With time increasing from 0 to 150 min, the intensity of the characteristic absorption band at peaks of 660 nm decreased gradually, suggesting that the methylene blue was gradually photodegradated by the TiO₂ and hierarchical TiO₂ nanofibre photocatalysts. After 120–150 minutes the methylene blue was almost completely removed from the solution.

Figure 5.

UV–Vis absorption spectra of photocatalytic degradation methylene blue recorded at different time intervals by the TiO₂ nanofibre catalyst.

Figure 6.

UV–Vis absorption spectra of photocatalytic degradation methylene blue recorded at different time intervals by the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures catalyst.

When TiO₂ is illuminated by UV light, electrons are excited from the valence band to the conduction band generating electron-hole pairs.²⁶ The holes in TiO₂ will react with water molecules or hydroxide ions and produce hydroxyl radicals. Oxygen is usually supplied as an electron acceptor to prolong the recombination of electron-hole pairs during photocatalytic oxidation. The hydroxyl radical is a powerful oxidizing agent and attacks organic pollutants present at or near the surface of TiO₂.²⁷ This causes photo-oxidation of pollutants according to the following processes: (i) photo-absorption of the semiconductor catalyst; (ii) the generation of electrons and holes; (iii) the transfer of charge carriers, and (iv) the utilization of the charge carriers by the reactants.

Time-dependent photodegradation of methylene blue is illustrated in Figure 7. It is shown that methylene blue decomposes in the presence of nanofibre and nanostructured TiO₂ nanofibre under illumination by UV light. From Figure 7, it is observable that the photocatalytic ability of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures is greater than that of the pure TiO₂ nanofibres. This suggests that hydrothermally modified TiO₂ possesses improved the efficiency of the electron-transfer dynamics.

Figure 7.

Time-dependent photodegradation of methylene blue under different conditions. The weight of catalyst used was kept constant in all cases.

4. Mechanism and Rate Equation

According to much of the literature, when an aqueous solution is irradiated in the presence of TiO₂ catalyst, the adsorbed water molecules react with holes in the valence band to form hydroxyl radicals and release of hydrogen ions. In addition, the dye molecules might be decomposed to form organic acids as the intermediate products. In our experiments, methylene blue solutions were pre-mixed with the TiO₂ suspension before the UV light was turned on to excite the TiO₂ nanostructures. Therefore, it was anticipated that the adsorption of methylene blue onto the TiO₂ nanostructure surface should be the first step in the reaction mechanism. Methylene blue-adsorbed TiO₂ nanostructures were then excited to generate hydroxyl and superoxide radicals which both participate in decomposition of the adsorbed methylene blue. The reaction steps for the decomposition of methylene blue can be summarized as:^28–30

T i O_{2} + d y e \leftrightarrow T i O_{2} - d y e

(1)

{TiO}_{2} - d y e + h υ \leftrightarrow T i O_{2} (e^{-}, h^{+}) - d y e

(2)

{TiO}_{2} (h^{+}) + H_{2} O_{(a d s)} \to T i O_{2} (O H_{(a d s)} •) + H^{+}

(3)

{TiO}_{2} (h^{+}) + O H_{(a d s)}^{-} \to T i O_{2} (O H_{(a d s)} •)

(4)

T i O_{2} (e^{-}) + O_{2 (a d s)} \to T i O_{2} (O_{2 (a d s)}^{-} •)

(5)

O H_{(a d s)} • + d y e \to int e r m e d i a t e products \to degradation products

(6)

O_{2 (ads)}^{-} • + d y e \to int e r m e d i a t e products \to degradation products

(7)

The photodegradation efficiency for each experiment, also called conversion, is calculated by the following relation:

X (%) = \frac{C_{0} - C}{C_{0}} x 100

(8)

where X is the photodegradation efficiency, C_o the concentration of methylene blue before illumination and C the concentration of methylene blue in suspension after time t (mg L⁻¹).

It is expected that more dye molecules are adsorbed on the surface of the hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures than on the TiO₂ nanofibre surface. This would increase the photoexcited electron transfer from the sensitized dye molecule to the conduction band of TiO₂ and consequently increase the electron transfer to any adsorbed O₂. It is likely that the TiO₂ nanorods generated on the surface of TiO₂ nanofibres enhance the reaction between photo-generated charges and O₂ or OH⁻ species on the surface better than pure TiO₂ nanofibres. The higher photocatalytic activity over the hierarchical nanostructures can be attributed to the efficient capture of reflected and refracted light by the radially outward oriented TiO₂ nanorods formed over the circumference of the titanium nanofibres. The formation of TiO₂ nanorods over TiO₂ nanofibres can be considered as an effective alternate to improve photodegradation rates by avoiding expensive additives.³¹ In addition, the nanorods in the hierarchical structure have high aspect ratio and nanoscale diameter which can promote accumulation of photoexcited electrons on the top ends of TiO₂ nanorods thereby retarding electron-hole recombination.³² In nanostructured TiO₂, the surface-to-volume ratio is very high and hence the reactive surface is also higher in this regime. Therefore, the surface adsorption and interfacial redox reaction is enhanced by using nanostructured materials.

The reaction rate for photocatalytic reactions is independent of hydroxyl concentration³³, therefore, a pseudo first-order kinetic model was used to fit the experimental data:

\frac{- d C_{M B}}{d t} = k C_{M B} C_{O H *}

(9)

where C_mb represents the dye concentration, mg/L; C_oh* represents the hydroxyl radical concentration, mg/L;

By the pseudo-stationary hypothesis (i.e., the C_oh* can be considered to be a constant in the presence of excess O₂), the rate expression (1) can be simplified to fit an equation following the first-order kinetics,

\frac{- d C_{M B}}{d t} = k C_{M B}

(10)

Integrating the above equation; from ‘C_mb0’ to ‘C_mb’ on the left hand side, and ‘0’ to ‘t’ on the right;

\begin{array}{l} \int_{C_{M B 0}}^{C_{M B}} - d C_{M B} = k \int_{0}^{t} d t \\ ln (C_{M B 0} / C_{M B}) = k t \end{array}

(11)

where C_mb0 represents the initial dye concentration in mg/L, k is pseudo first-order rate constant (min⁻¹), t is time interval (min) and C_mb represents the final dye concentration in mg/L.

The degradation rate data obtained for hierarchical TiO₂ and TiO₂ nanofibre concentration were plotted using the pseudo first-order kinetic model. The fairness of the fit is indicated by the fact that the linear regression (R²) values were 0.84 and 0.95 for hierarchical TiO₂ and TiO₂ nanofibres, respectively. Therefore, the model is in good agreement with the experimental data. The values of the first-order rate constant (k) and degradation efficiency (X) are indicated in Table 2 below. The value of k is 0.052 and 0.0132 min⁻¹ and efficiency (120 and 150minutes) are 94.6 and 92.5% for hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures and pure TiO₂ nanofibres, respectively. From the results it can be interpreted that the rate of degradation of methylene blue dye is faster for hierarchical titanium oxide than pure titanium oxide for dye concentration of 50 mg/L. The change in degradation efficiency with time for these samples is represented in Figure 8. We ascribe the enhanced kinetics of photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue to the higher surface area and peculiar morphology of solvothermally grown samples. In fact, for given conditions, the reaction rate is directly proportional to the fraction of catalytically active surface covered by methylene blue.

Figure 8.

Degradation efficiency (% conversion) of Pure TiO₂ nanofibres and hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures.

Table 2.

Comparison of rate constants and degradation efficiency for the degradation of methylene blue by hierarchical TiO₂ nanostructures and pure TiO₂ nanofibres.

Catalyst	Rate (min⁻¹)	Efficiency (%)
Hierarchical Titanium oxide	0.052±0.02	94.6 (120 min)
Pure Titanium Oxide	0.0132±0.013	92.5 (150 min)

5. Conclusion

In this work, hierarchical TiO₂ nanaostructures were prepared by first fabricating TiO₂ through a sol–gel route and electrospinning process followed by a solvothermal process in NaOH. A hierarchical (nanorod on nanofibre) structure was formed using an NaOH solvothermal process. We have also observed that no nanorods were formed when no NaOH was added to titanium oxide during the solvothermal process. Compared with titania nanofibres, the hierarchical titania nanostructures showed an increased photocatalytic activity. This improved efficiency in degrading methylene blue through the photocatalytic process is attributed to the larger specific surface area of the TiO₂ nanostructures, as well as high aspect ratio. The surface-to-volume ratio is very high, and hence, the reactive surface is also higher resulting in enhanced surface adsorption and interfacial redox reaction. This kind of TiO₂ hierarchical structured material promises high potential and significant large-scale applications in environmental photocatalysis.

Footnotes

6. Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Fellowship and Division of Research Services, Deakin University.

References

Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 1998, ISBN: 0-8213-3628-X.

Walker

G.M.

Hansen

Hanna

J.A.

Allen

S.J.

Water Res. 2003, 37, 2081.

Stydini

Dimitris

I.K.

Verykios

X.E.

Appl. Catal. Environ. 2004, 47, 189.

Mohamed

M.M.

J. Colloid and Interface Science 2004, 272, 28.

Mondal

Env. Eng. Sci. 2008, 25, 383.

Rai

H.S.

Bhattacharyya

M.S.

Singh

Bansal

T.K.

Vats

Banerjee

U.C.

Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 2005, 35, 219.

Mathews

R.W

McEvoy

R.S

Solar Energy 1992, 49, 507–513.

Matthews

R.W.

War. Res. 1991, 25, 1169–1176.

Matthews

R.W.

Abdullah

Low

G.K.-C.

Anal. Chem. Acta 1990, 233, 171–179.

10.

Matthews

R.W.

J. Catal. 1988, 111, 549–555.

11.

Matthews

R.W.

Wat. Res. 1986, 20, 569–578.

12.

Hoffmann

M.R.

Martin

S.T.

Choi

W.Y.

Bahnemann

D.W.

Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69.

13.

Arslan

Balcioglu

I.A.

Bahnemann

D.W.

Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2000, 26, 193.

14.

Pelizzetti

Minero

Electrochim. Acta 1993, 38, 47.

15.

Bhatkhande

D.S.

Pangarkar

V.G.

Beenackers

A.A.C.M.

J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 2002, 77, 102.

16.

Schmelling

D.C.

Gray

K.A.

Kamat

P.V.

Water. Res. 1997, 31, 1439.

17.

Zhang

Quan

Chen

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 167, 911.

18.

Zhang

Zhou

Lei

Carbon 2005, 43 (8), 1700.

19.

Y.Y.

Ding

Zhou

J.H.

Xiao

W.M.

Feng

Y.Y.

J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92 (4), 938.

20.

Kim

J.T.

Kim

K.S.

Jeong

Kim

H.Y.

Han

Y.S.

Electrochimica Acta 2009, 54(24), 5715.

21.

Guillard

Disdier

Monnet

Dussaud

Malato

Blanco

Maldonado

M.I.

Herrmann

J.M.

Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2003, 46, 319.

22.

Zhang

Shao

Zhang

Xue

Wang

Liu

J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 7920.

23.

Lauhon

L.J.

Gudiksen

M.S.

Wang

Lieber

C.M.

Nature 2002, 420, 57.

24.

Milliron

D.J.

Hughes

S.M.

Cui

Manna

Wang

L.-W.

Alivisatos

A.P.

Nature 2004, 430, 190.

25.

Jun

Y.-W.

Lee

S.-M.

Kang

N.-J.

Cheon

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5150.

26.

Lao

J.Y.

Wen

J.G.

Ren

Z.F.

Nano Lett. 2002, 11, 1287.

27.

Wang

Z.L.

Pan

Z.W.

AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 1029.

28.

Gao

Wang

Z.L.

J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 12653.

29.

Wan

Wei

Zhi

MacManus-Driscoll

J.L

Blamire

M.G.

AdV. Mater. 2006, 18, 234.

30.

Dick

K.A.

Deppert

Larsson

M.W.

Martensson

Seifert

Wallenberg

L.R.

Samuelson

Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 380.

31.

Zhang

D.-F.

Sun

L.-D.

Jia

C.-J.

Yan

Z.-G.

You

L.-P.

Yan

C.-H.

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13492.

32.

Ostermann

Yin

McCann

J.T.

Xia

Nano Lett. 2006, 6 (6), 1297.

33.

Liu

Zhang

Nishimoto

Jin

Tryk

Murakami

Fujishima

J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 253.

34.

Ingle

J.D.J.

Crouch

S.R.

Spectrochemical Analysis; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.

35.

Rhee

C.H.

Bae

S.W.

Lee

J.S.

Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 660.

36.

Karvaly

Hevesi

I. Z.

Naturforsch. 26a 1971, 245.

37.

Wendlandt

W.W.

Hecht

H.G.

Reflectance Spectroscopy, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1966.

38.

West

A.R.

Solid State Chemistry and its Application, Wiley, New York 1984, pp. 174.

39.

D.Z.

Cai

R.X.

Liu

Z.H.

Spectrochim. Acta A 2004, 60 (7), 1617.

40.

Legrini

Oliveros

Braun

A.M.

Chem. Rev. 1993, 93 (2), 671.

41.

Fujishima

Rao

T.N.

Tryk

D.A.

J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2000, 1, 1.

42.

Habibi

M.H.

Hassanzadeh

Mahdavi

J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2005, 172, 89.

43.

Gaalindo

Jacques

Kalt

J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2000, 130, 35.

44.

Archana

York

R.S.

Vaidyanathan

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3260.

45.

Kang

S-Z.

Song

J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2006, 27, 857.

46.

Guettai

Amar

H.A.

Desalination 2005, 185, 427–437.

Controlled Synthesis of TiO 2 Hierarchical Nanofibre Structures via Electrospinning and Solvothermal Processes: Photocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Methylene Blue

Abstract

Keywords

1. Introduction

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1 Electrospinning of TiO2 nanofibres

2.2 Solvothermal synthesis of TiO2 nanorods on nanofibre surface

2.3 Morphology and microstructure analysis

2.4 Photocatalytic study

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 SEM and TEM micrographs analyses

3.2 Optical spectroscopy and XRD studies of hierarchical titanium oxide nanofibres

3.3 Photocatalytic evaluation

4. Mechanism and Rate Equation

5. Conclusion

Footnotes

6. Acknowledgements

References

2.1 Electrospinning of TiO₂ nanofibres

2.2 Solvothermal synthesis of TiO₂ nanorods on nanofibre surface