A Mechatronics and Material Handling Systems Laboratory: Experiments and Case Studies

Abstract

Industrial mechatronic systems integrate technologies from a variety of engineering disciplines to create solutions to challenging manufacturing problems. The material handling industry utilizes mechatronics to move, track, and manipulate items in factories and distribution centers. Material handling systems are a logical choice of study, due to their use of multiple mechatronic elements. This article describes mechatronic experiments and projects in a new course. Topical coverage includes sensors, actuators, PLCs, robotics, pneumatics, hydraulics, human factors, teamwork, leadership, and project management. A series of eight laboratory experiments have been created to introduce PLCs, robotics, electric circuits, and data acquisition fundamentals. In-depth case studies synthesize the technologies and interpersonal skills together to create a flexible material handling system. The most significant student outcome is the successful completion of a course project that required individuals to apply mechatronics concepts and technology in a multi-disciplinary team setting to solve industrial material handling tasks.

Keywords

education experiments material handling mechatronics PLC robotics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acar

Parkin

, ‘Engineering education for mechatronics’, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, 43(1) (1996), 106–112.

Marsico

, ‘Incorporating a flexible manufacturing system into a design course’, in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 16–19 June 2002, ASEE, pp. 11097–11105.

Merkel

Fisher

, ‘A quick and easy PLC learning experience for mechatronics’, in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 18–21 June 2006, pp. 895–906.

Erickson

, ‘Innovative experiments for undergraduate factory automation’, in Proc. 13th World Congress, International Federation of Automatic Control, San Francisco, CA, 30 June–5 July 1996, pp. 99–104.

Krotkov

, ‘Robotics laboratory exercises’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 39(1) (1996), 94–97.

Chiou

Kwon

Rauniar

Sosa

, ‘Internet-based robotics and mechatronics experiments for remote laboratory development’, in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, 24–27 June 2007, pp. 1363–1379.

Khan

, ‘Current Technological Development and Mechatronics’, proceedings IEEE International Multi-Topic Conference 2001, IEEE INMIC 2001, pp. 111–117, Lahore University, Pakistan, 28–30 December 2001.

Lee

Park

, ‘Sensor-based robot control laboratory’, in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, 17–19 June 1991, Vol. 1 pp. 467–472.

Stormont

Chen

, ‘Using mobile robots for controls and mechatronics education’, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 21(6) (2005), 1039–1042.

10.

Ghone

Schubert

Wagner

, ‘Development of a mechatronics laboratory–eliminating barriers to manufacturing and control’, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, 50(2) (2003), 394–397.

11.

Ghone

Wagner

, ‘A multi-disciplinary mechatronics laboratory’, in Proc. ASEE Annual Conf., Nashville, TN, 22–25 June 2003. pp. 1607–1614.

12.

Shirley

Wagner

Collins

Gramopadhye

, ‘A mechatronics (and material handling systems) course – classroom topics, laboratory experiments, and project’, Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, 14–17 June 2009.

13.

Murray

Garbini

, ‘Mechatronics capstone design projects at the University of Washington’, Proc. IEEE/ASME Intl Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Atlanta, GA, 19–23 September 1999, pp. 598–604.

14.

Ebert-Uphoff

Gardner

Murray

Perez

, ‘Preparing for the next century: The state of mechatronics education’, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 5(2) (2000), 226–227.

15.

, ‘On improvement of graduate mechatronics course’, in Proc. 2005 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Orlando, FL, 5–11 November 2005, pp. 191–196.

16.

Thrambouldis

, ‘Model-integrated mechatronics–toward a new paradigm in the development of manufacturing systems’, IEEE Trans. Industrial Informatics, 1(1) (2005), pp. 54–61.

17.

Tutunji

Saleem

Rabbo

S. Abd

, ‘An undergraduate mechatronics project class at Philadelphia University, Jordan: Methodology and Experience’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 52(3) (2009), 365–375.

18.

Larson

, ‘A multidisciplinary engineering summer school in an industrial setting’, Eur. J. Enging Educ., 34(6) (2009), 511–526.

19.

Das

Yost

, ‘A 10-year mechatronics curriculum development initiative: Relevance, content, and results–part I’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 53(2) (2010), 194–201.

20.

Krishnan

Das

Yost

, ‘A 10-year mechatronics curriculum development initiative: Relevance, content, and results–part II’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 53(2) (2010), 202–208.

21.

Jammes

Smit

, ‘Service-oriented paradigms in industrial automation’, IEEE Trans. Industrial Informatics, 1(1) (2005), 62–70.

22.

Material Handling Industry of America, College-Industry Council on Material Handling Education, 2010, available at www.mhia.org, accessed 15 January 2010.

23.

Wagner

, ME 493/693 Laboratory Manual, V2.0, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, August 2009.

24.

Wang

, ‘Mechatronics education at CDHAW of Tongji University: Laboratory guidelines, framework, implementations, and improvements’, Mechatronics, 19 (2009), 1346–1352.

25.

Khatri

Ghangro

Kumar

Haque

, ‘Industrial data acquisition and control system using two PLCs networked over MPI network’, Proc. 2009 IEEE Symp. on Industrial Electronics & Applications, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 4–6 October 2009, pp. 399–402.

26.

Smith

, ‘Should PLCs be networked?’, Plant Engineering, 58(10) (2004), 42–44.