In this study, a novel educational tool is introduced for the genetic algorithm (GA)-based fuzzy logic controller (FLC) of a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive. This tool provides the operating principle of PMSM, essentials of GAs, and effects of FLC parameters on the performance of GA-based FLC. The proposed educational tool regarding GA-based FLC is a unique one in its field in the literature, as such a computer-based study aiming to teach the corresponding intelligent system has not been studied before, though both GA and FLC are well-known powerful techniques. The graphical interface, developed in Microsoft Visual C#. NET platform, has a flexible and functional structure. By changing motor operating conditions as well as GA and controller parameters, useful practices can be done on the whole system under various situations without wasting time. An evaluation of the tool is given based on student feedback.
SevgiL., ‘Modeling and simulation concepts in engineering education: Virtual tools’, Turk. J. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sci., 14(1) (2006), 113–127.
2.
YuK. C.HsuS. P. and HungY. H., ‘Optimization of fuzzy controller of permanent magnet synchronous motor’, J. Appl. Sci., 7(19) (2007), 2725–2735.
3.
RuizJ. R. R.EspinosaA. G.RomeralL. and OrtegaJ. A., ‘An introduction to fault diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous machines in master's degree courses’, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., published online (16 August 2010). DOI: 10.1002/cae.20479.
4.
SakawaM., Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multi-objective Optimization (Springer, Japan, 1993), pp. 252–257.
5.
CordonO.HerreraF.HoffmanF. and MagdalenaL., Genetic Fuzzy Systems, Evolutionary Tuning and Learning of Fuzzy Knowledge Bases, Advances in Fuzzy Systems-Applications and Theory, 19 (World Scientific, London, 2011), pp. 112–115.
6.
CordonO.HerreraF.HoffmanF.MagdalenaL. and GomideF., ‘Ten years of genetic fuzzy systems: Current framework and new trends’, Fuzzy Set Syst., 141(1) (2004), 5–31.
7.
ÇolakI.IrmakE.KabalciE. and IssiF., ‘Design and implementation of a remote laboratory platform using MATLAB builder for NE’, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., published online (1 December 2011). DOI: 10.1002/cae.21553.
8.
PasamontesM.ÁlvarezJ. D.GuzmánJ. L. and BerenguelM., ‘Learning switching control: A tank level-control exercise’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 55(2) (2012), 226–232.
9.
GüvençU.SönmezY. and BiroğulS., ‘A computer based educational tool for fuzzy logic-controlled DC-DC converters’, J. Polyt., 10(4) (2007), 339–346 (in Turkish with English abstract).
10.
AkçayolM. A.ElmasÇ.ErdemO. A. and KurtM., ‘An educational tool for fuzzy logic controller and classical controllers’, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., 12(2) (2004), 126–135.
11.
DemirtaşM.AltunY. and IstanbulluA., ‘An educational virtual laboratory for sliding mode and PID control of inverted pendulum’Proc 11th Int. Conf. Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM08), Brasov, Romania, 22–24 May 2008, pp. 149–156.
12.
ElmasÇ. and AkçayolM. A., ‘PC based educational tool for a switched reluctance drive with fuzzy logic’, Int. J. Elec. Eng. Educ., 40(3) (2003), 208–219.
13.
IrmakE., ‘Web-based simulation of direct current motor response to basic input signals’, J. Polyt., 9(2) (2006), 71–77 (in Turkish with English abstract).
14.
FoulloyL.BoukezzoulaR. and GalichetS., ‘An educational tool for fuzzy control’, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 14(2) (2004), 217–221.
15.
ThepsatomlP.NumsomranA.TipsuwanpoV. and TeanthongT., ‘DC motor speed control using fuzzy logic based on LabVIEW’, Proc. Int. Joint Conf. (SICE-ICASE), Busan, Korea, 18–21 October 2006, pp. 3617–3620.
16.
Gonzalez-GutierrezC. A., ‘A PC-based architecture for parameter analysis of vector-controlled induction motor drive’, Comput. Elect. Eng., 37(6) (2011), 858–868.
17.
ÖztürkN. and ÇelikE., ‘Speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motors using fuzzy controller based on genetic algorithms’, Int. J. Elec. Power., 43(1) (2012), 889–898.
18.
XiaC.GuoP.ShiT. and WangM., ‘Speed control of brushless DC motor using genetic algorithm based fuzzy controller’, Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Mechatronics and Automation (ICIMA), Chengdu, China, 26–31 August 2004, pp. 460–464.
19.
JantzenJ., ‘Design of Fuzzy Controllers’, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Automation, Tech. Report no. 98–H 871 (fpid), Lyngby, Denmark (1998).
20.
ElmasÇ. and AkçayolM. A., ‘Virtual electrical machinery laboratory: A fuzzy logic controller for induction motor drives’, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 20(2) (2004), 226–233.
21.
MoralesD. C.Jiménez-HorneroJ. E.VázquezF. and MorillaF., ‘Educational tool for optimal controller tuning using evolutionary strategies’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 55(1) (2012), 48–57.
22.
HauptR. L. and WernerD. H., Genetic Algorithms in Electromagnetics, 2nd edn (Wiley, New York, 2007), pp. 31–61.
23.
ChambersL. D., Practical Handbook of Genetic Algorithms: Complex Coding Systems, 3 (CRC Press, Washington, DC, 1998), pp. 134–150.
24.
SundararajanD.SubramanianB.SubramanianK. and KrishnanM., ‘Generation scheduling problem by intelligent genetic algorithm’, Comput. Elect. Eng., 39(1) (2013), 79–88.
25.
ÜstünO. and YıldızI., ‘Determination of the learning parameters in back propagation learning algorithm by genetic algorithm’, SDU Int. J. Tech. Sci., 1(2) (2009), 61–73 (in Turkish with English abstract).
26.
ÖztürkN. and ÇelikE., ‘Application of genetic algorithms to core loss coefficient extraction’, Prog. Electromagn. Res. M., 19 (2011), 133–146.
