Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are commonly employed in undergraduate engineering curricula. Limited literature is, however, available for the lay design engineer or engineering student regarding the modelling, simulation and analysis of the flight dynamics of small UAV systems, especially pertaining to flight dynamics modelling. There is great demand for unskilled UAV designers to predict the stability of new designs, quickly, cheaply, and with relative ease, preferably during the conceptual design stage. This paper summarizes some salient techniques for performing quick characterization of the longitudinal dynamics of a small, electrically propelled UAV, by using freely available software such as Datcom+, AVL, XFLR5 and MotoCalc. The simulation outputs compare favourably with experimental results from a wind tunnel. The software was also used to provide accurate estimates of coefficients required for performing an analysis of the UAV's longitudinal dynamics. The proffered analytical techniques should greatly benefit lay design engineers and engineering students venturing into the realm of UAV research.
NelsonR. C., Flight Stability and Automatic Control (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997).
2.
RoskamJ., Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls, Parts I and II (DARCorporation, Lawrence, KA, 1998).
3.
CookM. V., Flight Dynamics Principles (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997).
4.
EtkinB., Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996).
5.
StevensB. L.LewisF. L., Aircraft Control and Simulation (John Wiley & Sons, Hobokren, NJ, 2003).
6.
StengelR. F., Flight Dynamics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004).
7.
McRuerD.AshkensasI.GrahamD., Aircraft Dynamics and Automatic Control (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1973).
8.
ValavanisK.ValavanisK. P., Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: State of the Art and the Road to Autonomy (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007).
9.
JungD.RattiJ.TsiotrasP., ‘Real-time implementation and validation of a new hierarchical path planning scheme of UAVs via hardware-in-the-loop simulation’, J. Intell. Robot Syst., 54 (2009), 163–181.
10.
ChaoH.CaoY.ChenY., ‘Autopilots for small fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles: A survey’, Int. J. Contr. Automat. Syst., 8(1) (2010), 36–44.
JungD.TsiotrasP., ‘Modeling and hardware-in-the-loop simulation for a small unmanned aerial vehicle’, in AIAA Infotech at Aerospace, AIAA 07–2763 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Rohnert Park, May 2007).
13.
FinckR. D., US Air Force Stability and Control Data Compendium (Datcom) (DARCorporation, Lawrence, KS, 1983).
14.
WilliamsJ. E.VukelichS. R., The USAF Stability and Control DATCOM: AFFDL-TR-79-3032 (McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, St Louis, MO, 1979).
15.
DrelaM.YoungrenH., Athena Vortex Lattice (AVL) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering), available at http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/avl/ (accessed 10 March 2008).
StewartK. C.BlackburnK.WagenerJ.CzabaraneJ.AbateG., Development and Initial Flight Tests of a Single-Jointed Articulated-Wing Micro Air Vehicle, AIAA 2008–6708 (AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Reston, VA, 2008).
KleinV.MurphyP. C.CurryT. J.BrandonJ. M., Analysis of Wind Tunnel Longitudinal Static and Oscillatory Data of the F-16XL Aircraft (NASA/TM-97-206276, 1997).
21.
KleinV.MurphyP. C., Estimation of Aircraft Nonlinear Unsteady Parameters from Wind Tunnel Data (NASA TM-1998-208969, 1998).
22.
PawY. C., Synthesis and Validation of Flight Control for UAV (PhD thesis, Graduate School of the University of Minnesota, 2009).
23.
MotoCalc, Homepage of MotoCalc electrical propulsion system simulation, at http://www.motocalc.com (accessed 15 March 2008).
24.
McCormickB. W., Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995).
25.
RoskamJ., Airplane Design, Part VII: Determination of Stability, Control, and Performance Characteristics: FAR and Military Requirements (DARCorporation, Lawrence, KA, 2002).
26.
WhiteF. M., Fluid Mechanics, 5th edition (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997).
27.
GraceyW., The Experimental Determination of the Moments of Inertia of Airplanes by a Simplified Compound-Pendulum Method, report no. A574183 (NASA, Washington, DC, 1983).
28.
HallS., ‘Dynamic modelling’, Sport Aviation (July 1987), 30–36.
29.
GainerT. G.HoffmanS., Summary of Transformation Equations and Equations of Motion Used in Free Flight and Wind Tunnel Data Reduction Analysis (NASA SP-3070, 1972).
30.
CosynP.VierendeelsJ., ‘Design of fixed wing micro air vehicles’, Aeronautical Journal (2007), 315–326.
31.
RaymerD. P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC, 1989).
32.
FranklinG. F.PowellJ. D.Emami-NaeniA., Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems (Prentice Hall, New York, 2002).
33.
WaszakM. R.JenkinsL. N.IfjuP.Stability and Control Properties of an Aeroelastic Fixed Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle (AIAA-2001-4005, 2001).
34.
PapageorgiouE. C., Development of a Dynamic Model for a UAV (master's dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 1997).
35.
BlakeW. B., ‘Prediction of fighter aircraft dynamic derivatives using Digital Datcom’, Proceeding of the 3rd Applied Aerodynamics Conference (Colorado Springs, CO, AIAA-1985-4070, 1985).
36.
BlakelockJ. H., Automatic Control of Aircrafts and Missiles (Wiley, New York, 1991).
37.
RoskamJ., Airplane Design, Part II: Preliminary Configuration Design and Integration of the Propulsion System (DARCorporation, Lawrence, KA, 1997).
38.
AdkinsC. N.LiebeckR. H., ‘Design of optimum propellers’, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 10(5) (1994), 676–682.
39.
MuellerT. J.DeLaurierJ. D., ‘Aerodynamics of small vehicles’, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 35 (2003), 89–111.
