From Peripherality and Conflict to Consensus-Based Success? Applying a Foucauldian Perspective on Power and Discourse to the Irish Model of Social Partnership
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2009
From Peripherality and Conflict to Consensus-Based Success? Applying a Foucauldian Perspective on Power and Discourse to the Irish Model of Social Partnership
According to a widely held view, Ireland's economic success story in the 1990s is attributable to the social partnership process. An extensive supply side consensus between the actors is regarded as key to its success. However, in spite of its popularity, consensus has neither taken shape as an analytical concept nor has its creation been thoroughly scrutinised. In fact, the question remains unanswered as to how and under what conditions initially antagonistic actors began to consider the same (supply side) solution as the only possible route. Based on a Foucauldian perspective on power and discourse, this article examines the creation and structure of popular unanimity within the Irish social partnership model in order to reposition consensus from an explanans to an explanandum.
AllenK.2000. The Celtic Tiger: The Myth of Social Partnership in Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
2.
ATGWU1999. A New Agenda for Economic Power Sharing. Dublin: Amalgamated Transport & General Workers Union.
3.
BewP.HazelkornE.PattersonH.1989. The Dynamics of Irish Politics. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
4.
BoucherG.CollinsG.2003. ‘Having one's cake and being eaten too: Irish neo-Liberal corporatism’, Review of Social EconomyLXI(3): 295–316.
5.
BreenR.HannanD.RottmannD.B.WhelanC.T.1990. Understanding Contemporary Ireland: State, Class and Development in the Republic of Ireland. Houndmills and London: Macmillan Press.
6.
Campaign Against a Partnership Deal2000. No More Wage Restraint: Reject the New Partnership Deal. Dublin: Campaign Against a Partnership Deal.
7.
CassidyM.2002. ‘The Irish Economy: Recent Experience and Prospects’, pp. 5–32 in MunleyV.G.ThorntonR.J.AronsonJ.R. (eds), The Irish Economy in Transition: Successes, Problems, and Prospects. Amsterdam: JAI.
8.
ClearyJ.2003. ‘Misplaced Ideas?: Colonialism, Location and Dislocation in Irish Studies’, pp. 16–46 in CarrollC.KingP. (eds), Ireland and Postcolonial Theory. Cork: Cork University Press.
9.
DohertyE.M.2001. ‘Globalization, Social Partnership, and Industrial Relations in Ireland’, pp. 132–55 in CandlandC.SilR. (eds), The Politics of Labor in a Global Age. Continuity and Change in Late-Industrializing and Post-Socialist Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
FajertagG.PochetP. (eds) 2000. Social Pacts in Europe – New Dynamics. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
11.
FinneganR.B.McCarronE.T.2000. Ireland: Historical Echoes, Contemporary Politics. Colorado and Oxford: Westview.
12.
FitzgeraldR.GirvinB.2000. ‘Political Culture, Growth and the Conditions for Success in the Irish Economy’, pp. 268–85 in NolanB.O'ConnellP.J.WhelanC.T. (eds), Bust to the Boom? The Irish Experience of Growth and Inequality. Dublin: Johnswood Press.
13.
Fitz GeraldJ.2000. ‘The Story of Ireland's Failure – and Belated Success’, pp. 27–57 in NolanB.O'ConnellP.J.WhelanC.T. (eds), Bust to the Boom? The Irish Experience of Growth and Inequality. Dublin: Johnswood Press.
14.
FoucaultM.1978. Dispositive der Macht: Über Sexualität, Wissen und Wahrheit [Dis-positives of Power. About Sexuality, Knowledge and Truth]. Berlin: Merve Verlag.
15.
FoucaultM.1987. ‘Das Subjekt und die Macht’ [‘The Subject and Power’], pp. 243–61 in DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (eds), Michel Foucault: Jenseits von Strukturalismus und Hermeneutik [Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics]. Frankfurt a.M.: Athenäum.
16.
FoucaultMichel1996. Diskurs und Wahrheit: Die Problematisierung der Parrhesia [Discourse and Truth. The Problematization of Parrhesia]. Berlin: Merve-Verlag.
17.
GeraghtyD.1999. ‘Time for Bosses to Spread the Wealth’, Irish Times, 5 October 1999.
18.
Government of Ireland1987. Programme for National Recovery. Dublin: Stationery Office.
19.
Government of Ireland1991. Programme for Economic and Social Progress. Dublin: Stationery Office.
20.
Government of Ireland1994. Programme of Competitiveness and Work. Dublin: Stationery Office.
21.
Government of Ireland2003. Sustaining Progress: Social Partnership Programme 2003–2005. Dublin: Stationery Office.
22.
GrahamC.2001. Deconstructing Ireland: Identity, Theory, Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
23.
HajerM.A.1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
24.
HardimanN.1988. Pay, Politics, and Economic Performance in Ireland 1970–1987. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
HardimanN.2000. ‘Social Partnership, Wage Bargaining and Growth’, pp. 286–309 in NolanB.O'ConnellP.J.WhelanC.T. (eds), Bust to the Boom? The Irish Experience of Growth and Inequality. Dublin: Johnswood Press.
26.
HouseJ.D.McGrathK.2004. ‘Innovative Governance and Development in the New Ireland: Social Partnership and the Integrated Approach’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17(1): 29–58.
27.
IBEC1995. ‘Communication, not Confusion’, IBEC News May: 1.
28.
IBEC1996. ‘From Rhetoric to Reality’, IBEC News February: 1.
29.
IBEC2001. ‘Nothing for Nothing’, IBEC News February: 1.
30.
ICTU1984. Confronting the Job Crisis. Dublin.
31.
ICTU1987. Report of Proceedings at Annual Delegate Conference, Cork. Dublin: ICTU.
32.
ICTU1989. Report of Proceedings Annual Delegate Conference, Bundoran. Dublin: ICTU.
33.
ICTU1990a. The Programme for National Recovery in Review. Dublin: ICTU.
ICTU1995/1997. Report of the Executive Council. Dublin: ICTU.
36.
ICTU1999a. Challenges Facing Unions. Irish Society in the New Millenium. Dublin: ICTU.
37.
ICTU1999b. Report of Proceedings Biennial Delegate Conference, Killarney. Dublin: ICTU.
38.
Irish Independent2000. ‘Bust need not follow boom’, Irish Independent 24 March 2000.
39.
Irish Times1998. ‘Cassels sees threat to economic achievement arising from insecurity in half of population’, The Irish Times 2 June 1998.
40.
Irish Times2001. ‘Study questions the achievement of social partnership’, The Irish Times 16 May 2001.
41.
KellerR.2003. ‘Der Müll der Gesellschaft: Eine wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse’ [‘The Waste of Society: A Knowledge-based Discourse Analysis’], pp. 197–232 in KellerR.HirselandA.SchneiderW.ViehöverW. (eds), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 2: Forschungspraxis [Handbook of Social-scientist Discourse Analysis. Vol. 2: Practical Research Experience]. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
42.
KirbyRGibbonsL.CroningM.2002. ‘Introduction: The Reinvention of Ireland: A Critical Perspective’, pp. 1–18 in KirbyP.GibbonsL.CroningM. (eds), Reinventing Ireland: Culture, Society and the Global Economy. London: Pluto Press.
43.
LaffanB.2002. ‘Ireland and the European Union’, pp. 83–94 in CrottyW.SchmittD.E. (eds), Ireland on the World Stage. Essex: Pearson Education.
44.
LloydD.1999. Ireland after History. Cork: Cork University Press.
45.
MacPartlinB.1994. ‘The Development of Trade Union Organisation’, pp. 84–109 in MurphyT.V.RocheW.K. (eds), Irish Industrial Relations in Practice. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.
46.
Mac SharryR.2000. ‘The Challenge of 1987’, pp. 42–74 in Mac SharryR.WhiteP.A. (eds), The Making of the Celtic Tiger: The Inside Story of Ireland's Boom Economy. Dublin: Mercier.
NeidhardtF.2000. ‘Formen und Funktionen gesellschaftlichen Grundkonsenses' [‘Forms and Functions of the Society's Fundamental Consensus’], pp. 15–30 in SchuppertG.F.BumkeC. (eds), Bundesverfassungsgericht und gesellschaftlicher Grundkonsens [The Federal Constitutional Court and the Social Fundamental Consensus]. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
49.
National Economic and Social Council (NESC)1986. A Strategy for Development 1986–1990, Key Points. Dublin: NESC.
50.
National Economic and Social Council (NESC)1990. A Strategy for the Nineties: Economic Stability and Structural ChangeNo. 89. Dublin: NESC.
51.
National Economic and Social Council (NESC).A Strategy for Competitiveness, Growth and Employment No. 96. Dublin: NESC.
52.
National Economic and Social Council (NESC)1999. Strategy into the 21st Century No. 99. Dublin: NESC.
53.
NolanB.O'ConnellP.J.WhelanC.T. (eds) 2000. Bust to the Boom? The Irish Experience of Growth and Inequality. Dublin: Johnswood Press.
54.
O'ConnellP.J.1999. ‘Astonishing Success: Economic Growth and the Labour Market in Ireland’, Employment and Training Papers44. Geneva: ILO.
55.
O'DonnellR.ThomasD.1998. ‘Partnership and Policy-Making’, pp. 117–46 in HealyS.ReynoldsB. (eds), Social Policy in Ireland: Principles, Practice, Problems. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.
56.
O'DonnellR.ThomasD.2002. ‘Ireland in the 1990s: Policy Concertation Triumphant’, pp. 167–90 in BergerS.CompstonH. (eds), Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe: Lessons for the 21st Century. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
O'HearnD.1993. ‘Global Competition, Europe and Irish Peripherality’, Economic and Social Review24(2): 169–97.
59.
O'HearnD.2000. ‘Globalisation, “New Tigers”, and the End of the Development State? The Case of the Celtic Tiger’, Politics & Society28(1): 67–92.
60.
Ó RiainS.O'ConnellP.J.2000. ‘The Role of the State in Growth and Welfare’, pp. 310–39 in NolanB.O'ConnellP.J.WhelanC.T. (eds), Bust to the Boom? The Irish Experience of Growth and Inequality. Dublin: Johnswood Press.
61.
O'TooleF.1997. The Ex-Isle of Erin. Dublin: New Island Press.
62.
PodlechA.1976. ‘Wertentscheidungen und Konsens' [‘Value-based Decisions and Consensus’], pp. 9–28 in JakobsG. (ed.), Rechtsgeltung und Konsens [Law Validity and Consensus]. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.
63.
RhodesM.1998. ‘Globalization, Labour Markets and Welfare States: A Future of Competitive Corporatism?’, pp. 178–203 in RhodesM.MényY. (eds), The Future of European Welfare: A New Social Contract?Houndmills: Macmillan.
64.
RocheW.K.1994. ‘Industrialisation and the Development of Industrial Relations’, pp. 16–52 in MurphyT.V.RocheW.K. (eds), 1994Irish Industrial Relations in Practice. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.
65.
RocheW.K.1998. ‘Between Regime Fragmentation and Realignment: Irish Industrial Relations in the 1990s’. Industrial Relations Journal29(2): 112–25.
66.
RushM.1999. ‘Social Partnership in Ireland: Emergence and Process’, pp. 155–77 in KielyG.O'DonnellA.KennedyP.QuinS. (eds), Irish Social Policy in Context. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
67.
SheehanB.1996. ‘Crisis, Strategic Re-Evaluation and the Re-Emergence of Tripartism in Ireland’, Dublin, unpublished Ph.D thesis.
68.
van DykS.2006. Die Ordnung des Konsenses: Krisenmanagement in Sozialen Pakten am Beispiel Irlands und der Niederlande [The Order of Consensus. Crisis Management by Social Pacts in Ireland and the Netherlands]. Berlin: edition sigma.
69.
WhitakerT.K.1986. ‘Economic Development 1958–1985’, pp. 10–18 in KennedyK. A. (ed.), Ireland in Transition. Cork and Dublin: Mercier Press.
70.
YeatesP.2000. ‘Union leader sees national agreements as central to modernising state’, The Irish Times, 3 March 2000.
71.
ZimmermanE.1986. Neokorporative Politikformen in den Niederlanden: Industrie-politik, kollektive Arbeitsbeziehungen und hegemoniale Strukturen seit 1918. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
