BeckU.2009 [2007]. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity.
8.
BeckU.WillmsJ.2004 [2000]. Conversations with Ulrich Beck. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
BohmanJ.1991. New Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
BoltanksiL.2009. De la critique: Précis de sociologie de l'émancipation. Paris: Gallimard.
11.
BoltanskiL.HonnethA.2009. ‘Soziologie der Kritik oder Kritische Theorie? Ein Gespräch mit Robin Celikates’, pp. 81–114 in JaeggiR.WescheT. (eds), Was ist Kritik?Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
12.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL.1991. De la Justification: Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.
13.
CelikatesR.2009. Kritik als Praxis: Gesellschaftliche Selbstverständnis und kritische Theorie. Frankfurt: Campus.
14.
ConeinB.1990. ‘Peut-on observer l'interpretation’, pp. 311–34 in PharoP.QuéreL. (eds), Les formes de l'action. Paris: EHESS.
15.
ConeinB.2005. Les sens sociaux: Trois essays de sociologie cognitive. Paris: Economica.
16.
DelantyG.1999. Social Theory in a Changing World. Cambridge: Polity.
17.
DelantyG.2000. Modernity and Postmodernity. London: Sage.
18.
DelantyG.2005. Social Science: Philosophical and Methodological Foundations. Second edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
19.
DelantyG.2010. Community. Second edition. London: Routledge.
20.
DelantyG.O'MahonyP.2002. Nationalism and Social Theory. London: Sage.
21.
DelantyG.StrydomP. (eds) 2003. Philosophies of Social Science. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
22.
FullerS.2000. Thomas Kuhn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
FullerS.2006. The New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage.
24.
HonnethA.2007a. ‘Rejoinder’, pp. 347–70 in van der BrinkB.OwenD. (eds), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HonnethA.2007b. Pathologien der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
26.
HonnethA.2008. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HonnethA.2009a. ‘Schwierigkeiten kapitalismuskritischer Zeitdiagnosen: Gespräch mit Christoph Lieber’, pp. 137–47 in BasaureM.ReemtsmaJ.P.WilligR. (eds), Erneuerung der Kritik: Axel Honneth im Gespräch. Frankfurt: Campus.
28.
HonnethA.2009b. ‘Stationen auf dem Weg zu einer Kritischen Theorie der Anerkennung: Gespräch mit Franscesc Hernàndez und Benno Herzog’, pp. 175–83 in BasaureM.ReemtsmaJ.P.WilligR. (eds), Erneuerung der Kritik: Axel Honneth im Gespräch. Frankfurt: Campus.
29.
HonnethA.SaarM. (eds) 2003. Michel Foucault: Zwischenbilanz einer Rezeption. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
30.
IserM.2008. Empörung und Fortschritt: Grundlagen einer kritischen Theorie der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Campus.
31.
MillsWrightC.1970 [1959]. The Sociological Imagination. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
32.
O'MahonyP. (ed.) 1999. Nature, Risk and Responsibility. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
33.
O'MahonyP.DelantyG.1998. Rethinking Irish History. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
34.
OuthwaiteW.1987. New Philosophies of Social Science. London: Macmillan.
35.
OuthwaiteW.2000. ‘Rekonstruktion und methodologischer Dualismus’, pp. 218–41 in Müller-DoohmS. (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
36.
StrydomP.2008a. ‘Immanent transcendence: Critical theory's left-Hegelian heritage after 1989’, plenary presentation, Journal of European Social Theory 10th Anniversary Conference, University of Sussex, 19–21 June.
37.
StrydomP.2008b. ‘Philosophies of the social sciences’, in CrothersC. (ed.), Historical Developments and Theoretical Approaches in Sociology, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Developed under the auspices of UNESCO. Oxford: Eolss Publishers, www.eolss.net, accessed 12 November 2010.
38.
StrydomP.2011a. ‘The cognitive and metacognitive dimensions of social and political theory’, pp. 328–38 in DelantyG.TurnerS. (eds), Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
39.
StrydomP.2011b. Contemporary Critical Theory and Methodology. London: Routledge.
40.
ThévenotL.2006. L'action au pluriel: Sociologie des régimes d'engagement. Paris: La Découvert.
41.
ThévenotL.2007. ‘The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public’, European Journal of Social Theory10(3): 409–23.