Power and Oppression from the Perspective of the Sociology of Engagements: A Comparison with Bourdieu's and Dewey's Critical Approaches to Practical Activities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2011
Power and Oppression from the Perspective of the Sociology of Engagements: A Comparison with Bourdieu's and Dewey's Critical Approaches to Practical Activities
This paper draws a parallel between the classical works of John Dewey and Pierre Bourdieu with regard to their critical analyses of power which, in both cases, are grounded in the examination of practical activities. The comparison includes a third approach developed by the author, the sociology of engagements, which crossed the paths of the previous two and specifies the points of comparison.1 This latter approach deals with capacities, power and oppression through analysing kinds of practical engagement with the world that ensure such capacities, owing to mutually supporting dispositions of human beings and their environment.
AurayN.2007. ‘Folksonomy: A new way to serendipity’, Communications and Strategies65: 67–91.
2.
BarrowL.2006. ‘A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards’, Journal of Science Teacher Education17(3): 265–78.
3.
BeckU.1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
4.
BoguszT.2009. ‘Experiencing practical knowledge: Emerging convergences of pragmatism and practice theory’, unpublished manuscript.
5.
BoltanskiL.1979 [1982]. ‘Croissance universitaire et montée des cadres en France (1960–1975)’, Sociologie et sociétés12(1): 67–100.
6.
BoltanskiL.1987. The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme (French edition1982).
7.
BoltanskiL.2009. De la Critique. Précis de sociologie de l'émancipation. Paris: Gallimard.
8.
BoltanskiL.DarréY.SchiltzM.-A.1984. ‘La dénonciation’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales51: 3–40.
9.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL.1983. ‘Finding one's way in social space: A study based on games’, Social Science Information22(4/5): 631–79.
10.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL.1987. Les économies de la grandeur., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France et Centre d'Etude de l'Emploi.
11.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL. (eds) 1989. Justesse et justice dans le travail. (Cahiers du Centre d'Etudes de l'Emploi 33). Paris: PUF.
12.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL.2000. ‘The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgment’, Philosophical Explorations3(3): 208–31 (translated by Jo Smets).
13.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL.2006 [1991]. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (translated by PorterCatherine).
14.
BourdieuP.1977 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (translation by Richard Nice).
15.
BourdieuP.1980a. Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
16.
BourdieuP.1980b. ‘Le mort saisit le vif. Les relations entre l'histoire réifiée et l'histoire incorporée’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 32/33: 3–14.
17.
BourdieuP.1996 [1989]. State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Cambridge: Polity Press (translated by NiceRichard).
BourdieuP.2000 [1997]. Pascalian Mediations. Cambridge: Polity Press (translated by NiceRichard).
20.
BourdieuP.BoltanskiL.1974. ‘Le titre et le poste: Rapports entre le système de production et le système de reproduction’, Actes de la recherche en science sociales1(2): 95–107.
21.
BreviglieriM.2004. ‘Habiter l'espace de travail. Perspectives sur la routine’, Histoire & société. Revue européenne d'histoire sociale9: 18–29.
22.
BreviglieriM.Stavo-DebaugeJ.2006. ‘Sous les conventions. Accompagnement social à l'insertion: Entre sollicitude et sollicitation’, pp.129–44 in Eymard-DuvernayF. (ed.), L'économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats, Vol. II, Développements. Paris: La Découverte.
23.
BreviglieriM.Stavo-DebaugeJ.PattaroniL.2003. ‘Quelques effets de l'idée de proximité sur la conduite et le devenir du travail social’, Revue Suisse de sociologie29(1): 141–57.
24.
DesrosièresA.ThévenotL.1988. Les catégories socioprofessionnelles. Paris: La Découverte.
25.
DeweyJ.1929 [1925]. Experience and Nature. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
26.
DeweyJ.1930 [1922]. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Modern Library.
27.
DeweyJ.1946 [1927]. The Public and its Problems. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
28.
DeweyJ.1969 [1888]. ‘The ethics of democracy’, in The Early Works of DeweyJohn, 1882–1898, Vol. 3, Essays and Outlines of a Critical Theory of Ethics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
29.
DeweyJ.1969 [1891]. ‘Outlines of a critical theory of ethics’, in The Early Works of DeweyJohn, 1882–1898, Vol. 3, Essays and Outlines of a Critical Theory of Ethics. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
30.
DeweyJ.1980 [1934]. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
31.
DurkheimE.1955 [1914]. Pragmatisme et sociologie. Paris: Vrin.
32.
DurkheimE.1960 [1912]. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: PUF.
33.
DurkheimE.MaussM.1971 [1903]. ‘De quelques formes primitives de classification. Contribution à l’étude des représentations collectives’, Année sociologique6 (reprinted in M. Mauss, Essais de sociologie. Paris: Minuit).
34.
EliasophN.2011. Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare's End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Eymard-DuvernayF.1986. ‘La qualification des produits’, pp. 239–47 in SalaisR.ThévenotL. (eds), Le travail. Marché, règles, conventions. Paris: INSEE-Economica.
36.
FabianiJ.-L.2007. ‘La généralisation dans les sciences historiques: Obstacle épistémologique ou ambition légitime?’, Annales: Histoire, sciences sociales1: 9–28.
37.
FoucaultM.1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.
38.
HonnethA.2005. Reification: A Recognition-Theoretical View (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values). 14–16 March, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
39.
JoasH.1993. Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
JoasH.1997. The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
JournellW.2007. ‘Dewey and standardization: A philosophical look at the implications for social studies’, Social Studies Research and Practice2(3): 301–15.
42.
Knorr-CetinaK.SchatzkiT.von SavignyE. (eds) 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
43.
NormandR.2008. ‘School effectiveness of the horizon of the world as a laboratory’, British Journal of Sociology of Education29(6): 665–76.
44.
PattaroniL.2005. ‘Le care est-il institutionnalisable? Quand la “politique du care” émousse son éthique’, pp. 177–200 in PapermanP.LaugierS. (eds), Le souci des autres. Paris: EHESS.
45.
SartreJ.-P.1956 [1943]. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. New York: Philosophical Library (translated and introduced by HazelE. Barnes).
46.
SchonD.1992. ‘The theory of inquiry: Dewey's legacy to education’, Curriculum Inquiry22(2): 119–39.
47.
Stavo-DebaugeJ.2005. ‘Mobilising statistical powers for action against discriminations: The case of the United Kingdom’, International Social Science Journal183: 43–55.
48.
Stavo-DebaugeJ.TromD.2004. ‘Le pragmatisme et son public à l’épreuve du terrain: Penser avec Dewey contre Dewey’, pp. 195–226 in KarsentiB.QuéréL. (eds), La croyance et l'enquête. Aux sources du pragmatisme. Paris: EHESS.
49.
StrydomP.2002. Risk, Environment and Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
50.
StrydomP.2007. ‘Introduction: A Cartography of Contemporary Cognitive Social Theory’, European Journal of Social Theory10(3): 339–56.
51.
ThévenotL.1979. ‘Une jeunesse difficile: Les fonctions sociales du fou et de la rigueur dans les classements’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales26/27: 3–18.
52.
Thévenot, L. 1984. ‘Rules and implements: Investment in forms’, Social Science Information23(1): 1–45.
53.
ThévenotL.1990. ‘L'action qui convient’, pp. 39–69 in PharoP.QuéréL. (eds), Les formes de l'action. Paris: EHESS.
54.
ThévenotL.1995. ‘L'action publique contre l'exclusion dans des approches pluralistes du juste’, pp. 51–69 in AffichardJ.de FoucauldJ.-B. (eds), Pluralisme et équité; la justice sociale dans les démocraties. Paris: Esprit.
55.
ThévenotL.1997. ‘Un gouvernement par les normes; pratiques et politiques des formats d'information’, pp. 205–41 in ConeinB.ThévenotL. (eds), Cognition et information en société. Paris: EHESS.
56.
ThévenotL.2001. ‘Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world’, pp. 56–73 in Knorr-CetinaK.SchatzkiT.von SavignyE. (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
57.
ThévenotL.2002. ‘Which road to follow? The moral complexity of an “equipped” humanity’, pp. 53–87 in LawJ.MolA. (eds), Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
58.
ThévenotL.2005. ‘The two bodies of May ‘68: In common, in person’, pp. 252–71 in Sica AlanA.TurnerS. (eds), The Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
ThévenotL.2006. L'action au pluriel. Sociologie des régimes d'engagement. Paris: La Découverte.
60.
ThévenotL.2007a. ‘A science of life together in the world”, European Journal of Social Theory10(2): 233–44.
61.
ThévenotL.2007b‘The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public’, European Journal of Social Theory10(3): 413–27.
62.
ThévenotL.2009. ‘Governing life by standards: A view from engagements’, Social Studies of Science39(5): 793–813.
63.
ThévenotL. (forthcoming). ‘Bounded justifiability: Three constructions of commonality in the plural and their relations to binding engagements’, in DumouchelP.GotohR. (eds), Bounds and Boundaries: New Perspectives on Justice and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
von Böhm-BawerkE.1959 [1884]. Capital and Interest, History and Critique of Interest Theories. South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press (translated by HunckeG.SennholzH.-F.).
65.
WestbrookR. B.1992. ‘Schools for industrial democrats: The social origins of John Dewey's philosophy of education’, American Journal of Education100(4): 401–19.
