The study presented in this article explores the application of the principles of adult learning in the face to face (f2f) meetings organised within the context of blended learning courses. The study adopts a case study approach, employing qualitative data collection through semi-structured interviews with participants in four thematic units in two distance learning programmes: Greek Civilisation (undergraduate) and Education Studies (graduate) organised by the Open University of Cyprus and the Hellenic Open University. The research draws on andragogy and illustrates the experiences and perceptions of 16 adult learners and eight tutors with regard to: the design of the f2f meetings, the educational techniques and means used, the participation, and the perceived usefulness of such sessions. The article concludes by highlighting the limited use of the adult learning principles in designing and implementing f2f meetings during the distance learning programmes explored. Recommendations for the design of f2f sessions in consideration of adult learning are made.
BrookfieldS. (1986). Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BrookfieldS. (1995). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BrundageD. H.MacKeracherD. (1980). Adult Learning Principles and their Application to Program Planning. Toronto, Canada: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
4.
BurgeL. (1988). Beyond andragogy: Some explorations for distance learning design. Journal of Distance Education, 3(1), 5–23.
5.
CerconeK. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 16(2), 137–159.
6.
DayC.BaskettH. K. (1982). Discrepancies between intentions and practice: Re-examining some basic assumptions about adult and continuing professional education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1(2).
7.
FreyB. A.AlmanS. W. (2003). Applying adult learning theory to the online classroom. New Horizons in Adult Education, 17(1), 4–12.
8.
GravaniM. N. (2012). Adult learning principles in designing learning activities for teacher development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(4), 419–432.
9.
GravaniM. N.JohnP. D. (2005). ‘Them and us’: Teachers' and tutors' experiences of a ‘new’ professional development course in Greece. Compare, 35(3), 303–319.
10.
HartreeA. (1984). Malcolm Knowles' theory of andragogy: A critique. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 3(3), 203–210.
11.
HitchcockG.HughesD. (1989). Research and the Teacher. London, UK: Routledge.
12.
JarvisP. (1993). The education of adults and distance education in late modernity. in KeeganD. (ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 165–174). London, UK: Routledge.
13.
JarvisP. (2004). Adult Education and Lifelong Practice: Theory and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
14.
JarvisP. (ed.) (2006). The Theory and Practice of Teaching. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
15.
JarvisP. (ed.) (2012). From Adult Education to the Learning Society: 21 Years of the International Journal of Lifelong Education. London, UK: Routledge.
16.
KnowlesM. S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy (2nd edition), New York: Cambridge Books.
17.
KnowlesM. S. (1990). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, TX: Gulf.
18.
KnowlesM. S. & Associates (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
LeeD. (2000). Incorporating adult learning characteristics and preferences into a course on computer-based instructional design. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 48(3), 24–30.
20.
LockeK. D. (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
MerriamS. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 3–13.
22.
MerriamS. B.CaffarellaR. S. (1999). Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London, UK: Sage.
O'LawrenceH. (2007). An overview of the influences of distance learning on adult learners. Journal of Education and Human Development, 1(1), 1–8.
26.
OrmrodJ. E. (2008) Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
27.
PereiraA. (2005). Pedagogical issues in ODL. in VermeerschJ. (ed.), Getting Started with ODL (pp. 43–55). Antwerp, Belgium/Apeldoorn, Netherlands: Garant.
28.
PetersO. (2001). Learning and Teaching in Distance Education. London, UK: Kogan Page.
29.
PitsoeV. J.MailaM. W. (2011). Towards a reflexive teaching and learning framework in Open Distance Learning (ODL). Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2(6), 485–492.
30.
PrattD. D. (1993). Andragogy after twenty-five years. in MerriamS. B. (ed.), An Update on Adult Learning Theory (pp. 15–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
PunchK. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London, UK: Sage.
32.
RashidM. (2009). Status of face-to-face instruction in distance education at AIOU. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 142–149.
33.
RumbleG. (1982). The cost analysis of learning at distance: Venezuela's Universidad Nacional Abierta. Distance Education, 3(1), 116–140.
34.
SchapiroS. A. (2003). From andragogy to collaborative, critical pedagogy: Learning for academic, personal, and social empowerment in a distance-learning PhD program. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(2), 150–166.
35.
SmithC. (2010). ‘Distance learning’ or ‘learning at a distance’? Case study of an education initiative to deliver an in-service bachelors degree in Zambia. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol 47 (2), 223–233.
TennantM. (1986). An evaluation of Knowles' theory of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 5(2), 113–122.
38.
WilliamsA.TannerD.JessopT. (2007). The creation of virtual communities in a primary initial teacher training programme. Journal of Education for Teaching, 33(1), 71–82.
