This article reports the results of a study of repeat entrepreneurs in Tehran, Iran, in which nonlocal intuition was investigated in a replication and extension of experiment using measures of heart rate variability (HRV). Nonlocal intuition is the perception of information about a distant or future event by the body's psychophysiological systems, which is not based on reason or memories of prior experience. This study follows up on the McCraty, Radin, and Bradley studies, which found evidence of nonlocal intuition. We used Radin's experimental protocol, with the addition of HRV measures as in the McCraty studies involving computer administration of a random sequence of calm and emotional pictures as the stimulus, and conducted two experiments on mutually exclusive samples—the first on a group of single participants (N=15) and the second on a group of co-participant pairs (N=30)—to investigate the question of the “amplification” of intuition effects by social connection. Each experiment was conducted over 45 trials while heart rate rhythm activity was recorded continuously. Results, using random permutation analysis, a statistically conservative procedure, show significant pre-stimulus results—that is, for the period before the computer had randomly selected the picture stimulus—for both experiments. Moreover, while significant separation between the emotional and calm HRV curves was observed in the single-participant experiment, an even larger separation was apparent for the experiment on co-participant pairs; the difference between the two groups was also significant. Overall, the results of the single-participant experiment confirm previous finding: that electrophysiological measures, especially changes in the heart rhythm, can detect intuitive foreknowledge. This result is notable because it constitutes cross-cultural corroboration in a non-Western context—namely, Iran. In addition, the results for co-participant pairs offer new evidence on the amplification of the nonlocal intuition signal.
CromieS. Assessing entrepreneurial inclinations: some approaches and empirical evidence.Eur J Work Organizational Psychol.2000; 9(1): 7–30.
3.
ShaneS, VenkataramanS. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research.Acad Manage Rev.2000; 25(1): 217–26.
4.
SimonHA. Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion.The Acad Manage Executive (1987-1989).1987; 1(1): 57–64.
5.
MitchellJR, FrigaPN, MitchellRK. Untangling the intuition mess: intuition as a construct in entrepreneurship research.Entrepreneurship Theory Pract.2005; 29(6): 653–79.
6.
BaronRA. The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions.J Business Venturing.2004; 19(2): 221–39.
7.
LarsenA, BundesenC. A template-matching pandemonium recognizes unconstrained handwritten characters with high accuracy.Mem Cognit.1996; 24(2): 136–43.
8.
HahnU, ChaterN. Concepts and similarity. In: LambertsK, ShanksD, editors. Knowledge, concepts and categories.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1997: 43–92.
9.
AgorWH. Using intuition to manage organizations in the future.Bus Horiz.1984; 27(4): 49–54.
10.
LiebermanMD. Intuition: a social cognitive neuroscience approach.Psychol Bull.2000; 126(1): 109.
11.
BlockB. Intuition creeps out of the closet and into the boardroom.Manage Rev.1990; 79(5): 58–61.
12.
HayashiAM. When to trust your gut.Harv Bus Rev.2001; 79(2): 59–65.
13.
KleinG. Intuition at work: why developing your gut instinct will make you better at what you do.New York: Currency Doubleday; 2002.
14.
La PiraF, GillinM. Non-local intuition and the performance of serial entrepreneurs.International journal of entrepreneurship and small business.2006; 3(1): 17–35.
15.
AllinsonCW, HayesJ. The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition—analysis for organizational research.J Manage Studies.1996; 33(1): 119–35.
16.
RadinDI, SchlitzMJ. Gut feelings, intuition, and emotions: an exploratory study.J Altern Complement Med.2005; 11(1): 85–91.
17.
McCratyR, AtkinsonM, BradleyRT. Electrophysiological evidence of intuition: Part 1. The surprising role of the heart.J Altern Complement Med.2004; 10(1): 133–43.
18.
RadinDI. Unconscious perception of future emotions: An experiment in presentiment.J Sci Exploration.1997; 11(2): 163–80.
19.
BradleyRT, GillinM, McCratyR, AtkinsonM. Non-local intuition in entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs: results of two experiments using electrophysiological measures.Int J Entrepreneurship Small Business.2011; 12(3): 343–72.
20.
BlumeBD, CovinJG. Attributions to intuition in the venture founding process: do entrepreneurs actually use intuition or just say that they do?J Business Venturing.2011; 26(1): 137–51.
21.
HogarthRM. Educating intuition.University of Chicago Press; 2001.
22.
LaughlinC. The nature of intuition: a neuropsychological approach. In: Davis-FloydR, ArvidsonPS, editors. Intuition: the inside story.New York: Routledge; 1997: 19–37.
MyersDG. Intuition: its powers and perils:New Haven, CT: Yale University Press;2004.
25.
TorffB, SternbergRJ. Intuitive conceptions among learners and teachers. In: Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: student and teacher learning.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001: 3–26.
26.
McCratyR, ZayasM. Intuitive intelligence, self-regulation, and Llifting consciousness.Global Adv Health Med.DOI: 10.7453/gahmj. 2014.013. In press.
27.
DaneE, PrattMG. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making.Acad Manage Rev.2007; 32(1): 33–54.
28.
BurkeLA, MillerMK. Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making.Acad Manage Executive.1999; 13(4): 91–9.
29.
KhatriN, NgHA. The role of intuition in strategic decision making.Hum Relations.2000; 53(1): 57–86.
30.
WierzbickiAP. On the role of intuition in decision making and some ways of multicriteria aid of intuition.J Multi-criteria Decis Analysis.1997; 6(2): 65–76.
31.
PrietulaMJ, SimonHA. The experts in your midst.Harvard Bus Rev.1989; 67(1): 120–4.
32.
CrossanMM, LaneHW, WhiteRE. An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution.Acad Manage Rev.1999; 24(3): 522–37.
33.
IsenbergDJ. How senior managers think.Berkshire, UK: Open University Press; 1991.
34.
ParikhJ, NeubauerF-F, LankAG. Intuition: The new frontier of management:United Kingdom: Blackwell Oxford;1994.
35.
CovinJG, SlevinDP, HeeleyMB. Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs. technocratic mode: structural and environmental considerations.J Business Res.2001; 52(1): 51–67.
36.
LoyeD. The sphinx and the rainbow: brain, mind, and future vision.New York: Bantam Books; 1983.
37.
BradleyRT. Passionate attention and the psychophysiology of entrepreneurial intuition: a quantum-holographic theory.Int J Entrepreneurship Small Business.2010; 9(3): 324–48.
38.
NadeauR. The non-local universe: the new physics and matters of the mind.United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1999.
39.
BohmD, PeatFD. Science, order, and creativity.New York: Psychology Press; 2000.
40.
BradleyR, TomasinoD, DanaL. Entrepreneurial passion and the psychophysiology of intuitive action: a quantum-holographic approach. In: KentC, editor. Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010.
BradleyRT. The psychophysiology of intuition: A quantum-holographic theory of nonlocal communication.World Futures.2007; 63(2): 61–97.
43.
WalachH, SchmidtS. Repairing Plato's life boat with Ockham's razor: the important function of research in anomalies for consciousness studies.J Consciousness Studies.2005; 12(2): 52–70.
44.
SpottiswoodeSJP, MayE. Skin conductance prestimulus response: Analyses, artifacts and a pilot study.J Sci Exploration.2003; 17(4): 617–41.
RadinDI. Electrodermal presentiments of future emotions.J Sci Exploration.2004; 18(2): 253–73.
47.
LevinJ, KennedyJ. The relationship of slow cortical potentials to psi information in man.J Parapsychol.1975; 39: 25–6.
48.
WarrenCA, McDonoughBE, DonNS. Event-related brain potential changes in a psi task.J Parapsychol.1992; 56(1): 1–30.
49.
DonNS, McDonoughBE, WarrenCA. Event-related brain potential (ERP) indicators of unconscious psi: a replication using subjects unselected for psi.Journal of Parapsychology.1998; 62: 127–45.
50.
McDonoughBE, DonNS, WarrenCA. Differential event-related potentials to targets and decoys in a guessing task.J Sci Exploration.2002; 16(2): 187–206.
51.
BiermanDJ, RadinDI. Anomalous anticipatory response on randomized future conditions.Percept Mot Skills.1997; 84(2): 689–90.
FietJO, ClouseVG, NortonWIJr. Systematic search by repeat entrepreneurs. In: ButlerJE, editor. Opportunity identification and entrepreneurial behavior.Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc; 2004: 1–27.
57.
McCratyR, AtkinsonM, BradleyRT. Electrophysiological evidence of intuition: Part 2.A system-wide process? J Altern Complement Med.2004; 10(2): 325–36.
58.
BlairRC, KarniskiW. An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials.Psychophysiol.1993; 30(5): 518–24.
59.
TomasinoD. The psychophysiological basis of creativity and intuition: accessing'the zone'of entrepreneurship.Int J Entrepreneurship Small Business.2007; 4(5): 528–42.
60.
TomasinoDE. The heart in intuition: tools for cultivating intuitive intelligence. In: SinclairM, editor. Handbook of intuition research.Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar PUblishing; 2011: 247–60.
