The treatment of moving tumors with a scanned ion beam is challenging due to interplay effects and changing beam range. We propose multigating, as a method for 4D-treatment optimization and delivery. In 3D beam tracking, tracking vectors are added during delivery to beam spot positions based on the detected motion phase. This has the disadvantage of dose errors in case of complex motion patterns and an uncertain out-of-target dose distribution. In multigating, the motion phase for each beam spot is predefined, which allows to add the tracking vector prior to beam weight optimization on all motion phases. The synchronization of delivery and target motion is assured by fast gating. The feasibility of the delivery was shown in a film experiment and required only minor software modification to the treatment planning system. In a treatment planning study in 4 lung cancer patients, target coverage could be restored to the level of a static reference plan by multigating (V95 > 99%) but not by standard beam tracking (V95 < 95%). The conformity of the multigating plans was only slightly lower than those of the static plan, with a conformity number of 72.0% (median, range 64.6–76.6%) compared to 75.8% (70.8–81.5%) in spite of target motion of up to 22 mm. In conclusion, we showed the technical feasibility of multigating, a 4D-optimization and delivery method using scanned beams that allows for conformal and homogeneous dose delivery to moving targets also in case of complex motion.
HanleyJDeboisMMMahDMagerasGSRabenARosenzweigKMychalczakBSchwartzLHGloegglerPJ & LutzW. Deep inspiration breath-hold technique for lung tumors: The potential value of target immobilization and reduced lung density in dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol45, 603–611, (1999). PMID: 10524412.
2.
KontrisovaKStockMDieckmannKBognerJPotterR & GeorgD. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy in different respiration conditions: A modeling study. Radiother Oncol81, 97–104, (2006). DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.006.
3.
WongJWSharpeMBJaffrayDAKiniVRRobertsonJMStrombergJS & MartinezAA. The use of active breathing control (ABC) to reduce margin for breathing motion. Int J Radiat Oncol44, 911–919, (1999). PMID: 10386650.
4.
RiboldiMOrecchiaR & BaroniG. Real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy: Technological developments and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol13, e383–e391 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70243-7.
5.
NelsonCStarkschallGBalterPFitzpatrickMJAntolakJATolaniN & PradoK. Respiration-correlated treatment delivery using feedback-guided breath hold: A technical study. Med Phys32, 175–181, (2005). PMID: 15719968.
6.
BertC & DuranteM. Motion in radiotherapy: Particle therapy. Phys Med Biol56, R113–R144 (2011). DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/16/R01.
7.
SaitoNBertCChaudhriNGemmelASchardtD & RietzelE. Speed and accuracy of a beam tracking system for treatment of moving targets with scanned ion beams. Phys Med Biol54, 4849–4862, (2009). DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/16/001.
8.
BertCSaitoNSchmidtAChaudhriNSchardtD & RietzelE. Target motion tracking with a scanned particle beam. Med Phys34, 4768–4771, (2007). PMID: 18196804.
9.
LüchtenborgRSaitoNDuranteM & BertC. Experimental verification of a real-time compensation functionality for dose changes due to target motion in scanned particle therapy. Med Phys38, 5448–5458, (2011). DOI: 10.1118/1.3633891.
10.
BertCGemmelASaitoNChaudhriNSchardtDDuranteMKraftG & RietzelE. Dosimetric precision of an ion beam tracking system. Radiat Oncol5, 61 (2010). DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-61.
11.
KeallPJSiebersJVJoshiS & MohanR. Monte Carlo as a four-dimensional radiotherapy treatment-planning tool to account for respiratory motion. Phys Med Biol49, 3639–3648, (2004). PMID: 15446794.
12.
TrofimovARietzelELuHMMartinBJiangSChenGTY & BortfeldT. Temporo-spatial IMRT optimization: Concepts, implementation and initial results. Phys Med Biol50, 2779–2798, (2005). PMID: 15930602.
13.
KrämerM & ScholzM. Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: Calculation and optimization of biologically effective dose. Phys Med Biol45, 3319–3330, (2000). PMID: 11098906.
14.
RichterDSchwarzkopfATrautmannJKramerMDuranteMJakelO & BertC. Upgrade and benchmarking of a 4D treatment planning system for scanned ion beam therapy. Med Phys40, 051722 (2013). DOI:10.1118/1.4800802.
15.
NohadaniOSecoJ & BortfeldT. Motion management with phase-adapted 4D-optimization. Phys Med Biol55, 5189–5202, (2010). DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/17/019.
16.
SatoSFurukawaT & NodaK. Dynamic intensity control system with RF-knockout slow-extraction in the HIMAC synchrotron. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment574, 226–231, (2007). DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.01.174.
17.
SchömersCFeldmeierEHabererTNaumannJPanseR & PetersA. Implementation of an intensity feedback loop for an ion therapy synchtrotron. IPAC2011, p. 2851.
18.
NodaKKanazawaMItanoA. Slow beam extraction by a transverse RF field with AM and FM. Nucl Instrum Meth A374, 269–277, (1996).
19.
LowDAHarmsWBMuticS & PurdyJA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys25, 656–661, (1998). PMID: 9608475.
20.
ShacklefordJAKandasamyN & SharpGC. On developing B-spline registration algorithms for multi-core processors. Phys Med Biol55, 6329–6351, (2010). DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/21/001.
21.
MiyamotoTYamamotoNNishimuraH. Carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol66, 127–140, (2003). PMID: 12648784.
22.
ElsässerTWeyratherWKFriedrichT. Quantification of the relative biological effectiveness for ion beam radiotherapy: Direct experimental comparison of proton and carbon ion beams and a novel approach for treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys78, 1177–1183, (2010). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.014.
van't RietAMakACMoerlandMAEldersLH & van der ZeeW. A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: Application to the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys37, 731–736, (1997). PMID: 9112473.
25.
SecoJRobertsonDTrofimovA & PaganettiH. Breathing interplay effects during proton beam scanning: Simulation and statistical analysis. Phys Med Biol54, N283–N294 (2009). DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/N01.
26.
FurukawaTInaniwaTSatoSShiraiTMoriSTakeshitaEMizushimaKHimukaiT & NodaK. Moving target irradiation with fast rescanning and gating in particle therapy. Med Phys37, 4874–4879, (2010). PMID: 20964205.
27.
TsunashimaYVedamSDongLUmezawaMSakaeTBuesMBalterPSmithA & MohanR. Efficiency of respiratory-gated delivery of synchrotron-based pulsed proton irradiation. Phys Med Biol53, 1947–1959, (2008). DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/7/010.
28.
RiboldiMOrecchiaR & BaroniG. Real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy: Technological developments and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol13, e383–e391 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70243-7.
29.
BoyeDLomaxT & KnopfA. Mapping motion from 4D-MRI to 3D-CT for use in 4D dose calculations: A technical feasibility study. Med Phys40, 061702 (2013). DOI: 10.1118/1.4801914.
30.
SeregniMKaderkaRFattoriG. Tumor tracking based on correlation models in scanned ion beam therapy: An experimental study. Phys Med Biol58, 4659–4678, (2013). DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4659.
