24:I[63208,["8920","static/chunks/8920-efbff8517d590b7e.js","9097","static/chunks/9097-7e60ff382fede0de.js","5914","static/chunks/5914-356082358a498a0b.js","9903","static/chunks/9903-11222066602aad8e.js","5438","static/chunks/5438-cfc6cd3ec63ed58c.js","3851","static/chunks/3851-d9d99b9df58ccefb.js","4621","static/chunks/4621-60797c2425663d2a.js","6871","static/chunks/6871-85cb03c97585f46a.js","6736","static/chunks/6736-932312a004c99faf.js","4550","static/chunks/4550-0bf059e3050c08b3.js","688","static/chunks/688-a6a2ac7bff269cd3.js","3984","static/chunks/3984-063c0b62f32133c7.js","7038","static/chunks/7038-4f87670d4e55ef18.js","9039","static/chunks/9039-75366c62dc7d0d0e.js","4563","static/chunks/4563-ad980d1babbf7b0b.js","6761","static/chunks/6761-0c10d1446de7ae1c.js","744","static/chunks/744-1e76229abb9e297b.js","7342","static/chunks/7342-1586df78600bf911.js","3617","static/chunks/3617-1f62a097637f4747.js","5895","static/chunks/5895-caa6c774914eb108.js","7481","static/chunks/7481-3b84c503a2ebfb3f.js","3668","static/chunks/3668-7dab69e4121c33af.js","39","static/chunks/39-e93a27d0920e6d92.js","2881","static/chunks/2881-445cc2384af2c6f9.js","2364","static/chunks/2364-e83d52fb21729d99.js","3208","static/chunks/3208-e65462d166bd3688.js","7582","static/chunks/app/toc/%5Btla%5D/%5Bvolume%5D/%5Bissue%5D/page-694a0e465c2c1334.js"],"default"] 25:T4cf,

It is often assumed that only cis women experience pregnancy. This fails to account for the trans and nonbinary people who are and have been pregnant, and therefore presents a partial picture of what pregnancy is, how pregnancy is experienced, and the conceptual and normative issues that surround having a pregnancy. In this article we argue for rethinking pregnancy and re-envisioning conceptual, social, medical, and legal approaches to pregnant persons by focussing on trans experiences, thereby trans/forming pregnancy. We highlight the ‘genderfication’ that permeates dominant formulations of pregnancy, which often implicitly or explicitly endorse a biological essentialism that takes birth-giving as necessary and sufficient for motherhood. We look in depth at the United Kingdom, but take our analysis to have far wider applicability and implications. Our aim is to trans/form philosophical approaches to gender and reproduction and contribute to practical guidance built from empirical and theoretical research, looking for positive outcomes for trans individuals who experience pregnancy. We take trans pregnancy seriously, on its own terms, arguing that doing so is both a theoretical and ethical imperative.

26:T41b,

Some midwives and related professionals agree with concerns expressed in the popular media about the removal of the “sexed terms” woman and mother from reproductive healthcare discourse. They contend that while gender may be chosen and diverse, biological or reproductive sex is immutable and anatomically based. It follows, they claim, that while we may affirm people’s gender choices, binary sex ought to be the identifying factor in reproductive healthcare, research, and advocacy. Sex-based language advocates also make the unexamined metaphysical assumption that reality is material and natural and that sex is on this unshakable, grounding level. In contrast, I argue that they ignore the true complexity and diversity of sex/gender differentiation and are motivated by their own situated, politicized gender identity. These beliefs result in measurable reproductive harm to trans, nonbinary, and other gender diverse individuals.

27:T450,

This article presents an exercise in prebunking, a preventive strategy based on inoculation theory (McGuire, 1964), aimed at enhancing cognitive resistance to misinformation. The analysis examines a set of arguments articulated from prejudicial and false information circulating in the debate on the inclusion of trans people in the field of reproductive health and rights. Through an assessment of their underlying premises, logica