Cancer Biomarkers

Mutations of the base excision repair gene MUTYH have been reported as underlying genetic defects in autosomal-recessive familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Our aim was to determine the frequency of the most common mutations (p.Tyr165Cys and p.Gly382Asp) in patients with strong evidence for familial colorectal cancer (fCRC).

Cervical cancer is one of the most common neoplastic diseases affecting women, with a combined world wide incidence of almost half a million new cases. Reduced DNA repair capacity (DRC) can render a high risk of developing many types of cancer; including cervical cancer. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may contribute the genetic instability and carcinogenesis. Smoking experience and use of oral contraceptives have been confirmed to be risk factors for cervical cancer. The purpose of the present study was, therefore to investigate APE-1 genotypes (Asp/Asp, Asp/Glu, Glu/Glu) with different histological subtypes in cases compared with controls. It has been observed that Asp/Glu with Glu/Glu genotypes that combined we observed statistically significant with protective effect for developing of cervix cancer (OR-0.51, 95% CI 0.31–0.83, p-0.006). The combined Asp/Glu with Glu/Glu genotypes who were using oral contraceptives were shown to be statistically significant with reduced risk of cervical cancer (OR-0.22 95% CI- 0.11–0.47, p-0.0002). It has been suggested that significantly correlation between HPV 16 and users of oral contraceptives in certain APE-1 genotypes with reduced risk in developing cervix cancer. In conclusion we observed statistical significant association with reduced risk of cervix cancer in APE-1 with different genotypes, though, on the other hand, in association between HPV type 18 and those having SCC, highly increased risk of cervical cancer was observed.

RB1 mutation detection has greatly improved the clinical management of retinoblastoma and provides critical information to predict the risk of inheriting the disease. We screened for RB1 gene sequence alterations in both peripheral blood and tumor specimens from a total of 48 Mexican retinoblastoma patients using an SSCP-based screening approach followed by sequencing. Overall, 21 (43.8%) cases were bilateral and 27 (56.2%) were unilateral. Interestingly, 51.8% of unilateral patients developed the tumor before age 1 year and 10 of wich (71.4%) were diagnosed before the age of 6 months. Thirteen different oncogenic mutations were detected in 14/48 (29.2%) patients, 9 of which were germline (64.3%). Six of these mutations are novel (IVS3-1G>T, 125X, 389X, 610X, 750X and −149G>T). The most frequent types of mutation were frameshift and nonsense (30.8% each). Moreover, 5 intronic variants were identified, two of which are novel (g.41908 C/A and g.161976del6T). Loss of heterozygosity of the RB1 gene as assessed by intron1/BamHI and intron17/XbaI intragenic markers was 50.0% (18 of 36 informative cases), being higher in tumors with known mutations (76.9% vs 34.8%). This low mutation detection rate and the earlier age at diagnosis in unilateral retinoblastoma cases suggest that other RB1 inactivating mechanisms could be present in the retinoblastoma development.

In this study, mutation analysis was not helpful to distinguish sporadic and hereditary retinoblastoma, so, other approaches are needed to improve the molecular diagnosis of retinoblastoma and supports further investigations of Mexican retinoblastoma patients.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are promising epigenetic cancer chemotherapeutics rapidly approaching clinical use. HDACi increases acetylation levels of histone and non-histone proteins and causes an alteration in gene-expression levels, ultimately resulting in proliferation arrest or apoptosis of especially cancer cells. However, the precise mechanism of action of this class of therapeutics and the genes implicated in sensitivity remain obscure. Hence, there is a need for identifying predictive biomarkers. In this study, we examined the gene-expression levels of selected possible HDACi biomarkers, as suggested in the literature. This was correlated with the inherent sensitivity towards the HDACi belinostat in a panel of 18 wild-type cancer cell lines with up to a 30-fold difference in chemosensitivity, which matched IC50 data from the NCI60 screen. Of 16 genes examined, 4 showed a correlation in their expression levels to belinostat sensitivity: Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC1), v-ski sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (SKI), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), and thymidylate synthetase (TYMS). Including ODC and SKI simultaneously further strengthened the model. Further, there was no correlation between sensitivity and intracellular belinostat uptake or with histone and tubulin acetylation. Therefore, the genes identified in this study may be potential biomarkers for predicting clinical HDACi sensitivity.

Although E-cadherin expression is frequently reduced in colorectal cancers (CRCs), this does not appear to be due to gene mutation or allele loss. We investigated the hypothesis that promoter methylation could be responsible for supression of E-cadherin expression in 142 pairs of sporadic CRCs and respective normal mucosae. E-cadherin expression was examined by Western blot. E-cadherin methylation at two promoter regions was quantitatively measured by methylation specific real time PCR (MethyLight). We found that E-cadherin protein levels were significantly lower in CRCs, even in Dukes' A tumors, compared to normal mucosae. Decreased E-cadherin protein expression in CRCs was an independent poor prognostic factor in multivariate disease-free survival analysis. However, the extent of DNA methylation was extremely modest at both regions of the E-cadherin promoter. There was no correlation between DNA methylation and E-cadherin protein levels in either tumors or matched normal tissues. These findings suggested that supression of E-cadherin expression in CRCs is a significant event and is possibly involved in both carcinoma development and progression. However, our data did not support a crucial role of promoter methylation of the E-cadherin gene in the remarkable downregulation of E-cadherin expression in CRCs. Methylated E-cadherin gene as a CRC biomarker therefore needs further validation.