Objective

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in internationally adopted patients with cleft lip and palate to those in non-adopted peers.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Multidisciplinary cleft team at tertiary care hospital.

Patients

Patients aged ≥ 8 with cleft lip and palate attending routine cleft team evaluations September 2021 - September 2022.

Main Outcome Measure

CLEFT-Q PRO scores.

Results

Sixty-four internationally adopted patients and 113 non-adopted patients with a mean age of 13 years were included. Compared to non-adopted peers, adopted patients demonstrated worse satisfaction with face appearance (mean 59 vs. 66, p = .044), speech function (mean 69 vs. 78, p = .005), and speech distress (mean 80 vs. 84, p = .032). No significant differences were observed on the nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, lip scar, jaws, psychological function, or social function scales (p > .05). Objective clinical evaluation corroborated these findings, with adopted patients demonstrating worse Pittsburgh Weighted Speech scores (mean 3.0 vs 1.9, p = .027) and greater incidence of articulation errors (64% vs 46%, p = .021). No significant differences were observed in rates of mood, anxiety, or behavior concerns identified on psychosocial assessment (p = .764). Among adopted patients, undergoing palatoplasty prior to adoption was associated with worse satisfaction with speech, appearance, school, and social function (p < .05).

Conclusions

Patient-reported outcomes among internationally adopted adolescents and young adults with cleft lip and palate show slightly lower satisfaction with facial appearance and speech but otherwise demonstrate similar results to non-adopted peers on most appearance and psychosocial measures. PRO data correlated well with objective speech assessment and did not portend worse psychosocial function.