Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics

In patients with an acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, novel P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors, prasugrel and ticagrelor, are proposed as “first-line” antiplatelet agents in the absence of contraindications and up to a year from the index event. However, de-escalation of treatment to clopidogrel occurs with a variable frequency in real-life practice, most commonly due to an increased bleeding potential, more frequent side effects, and a higher cost for the novel agents. Pharmacodynamic studies provide most of the data on guidance for de-escalation. Despite positive messages from recent trials and registries, lack of definitive efficacy or safety results of such a strategy remains an obstacle to suggest de-escalation in a routine basis. Carefully designed studies are likely to improve our understanding of the impact of de-escalation and help to better define its position in current pharmacotherapy.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets may not be achieved by statin monotherapy, especially in high-risk patients. Furthermore, in some patient subgroups, atherogenic dyslipidemia is observed. As a result, a combination of a statin with other hypolipidemic drugs may have additional benefits, especially in the form of a single tablet. The aim of this review is to present the novel fixed-dose drug combinations for the management of hyperlipidemia. Statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates have established their efficacy and safety in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Clinical trials have shown that these hypolipidemic drug classes can be safely combined in order to augment the lipid-lowering efficacy. Furthermore, novel hypolipidemic drugs such as bembedoic acid and berberine have shown some promising initial results. The combination of different hypolipidemic regimens in a fixed-dose formulation can enhance the adherence to hypolipidemic treatment leading to improved outcomes. Moreover, complementary mechanisms of action of the combined hypolipidemic drugs may also provide additional benefits such as improvement in carbohydrate metabolism. As a result, fixed-dose combinations of hypolipidemic agents may provide an attractive option for the effective and safe management of hypercholesterolemia.

Vascular calcification results from an imbalance of promoters and inhibitors of mineralization in the vascular wall, culminating in the creation of an organized extracellular matrix deposition. It is characterized by the accumulation of calcium phosphate complex and crystallization of hydroxyapatite in the tunica media, leading to vessel stiffening. The underlying initiators of dysregulated calcification maintenance are diverse. These range from the expression of bone-associated proteins, to the osteogenic transdifferentiation of smooth muscle cells to osteoblast-like cells, to the release of fragmented apoptotic bodies and mineralization competent extracellular vesicles by smooth muscle cells, which act as a nucleation site for the deposition of hydroxyapatite crystals. The process involves a complex interplay between vitamin K-dependent calcification-inhibitory proteins, such as matrix γ-carboxyglutamate acid (Gla) protein, Gla-rich protein and growth arrest-specific gene 6 protein, and stimulatory mediators, such as osteocalcin. Vitamin K plays an important role as a cofactor for posttranslational γ-carboxylation of matrix Gla proteins in converting to a biologically active conformation. Drugs that inhibit vitamin K, such as warfarin, impair γ-carboxylation of Gla proteins, resulting in the accumulation of uncarboxylated proteins lacking calcification-inhibitory capacity. This article overviews the involvement of systemically and locally expressed vitamin K-dependent proteins in vascular calcification and their potential as biomarkers of calcification.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and its severe subtype pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) encompass a set of multifactorial diseases defined by sustained elevation of pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance leading to right ventricular failure and subsequent death. Pulmonary hypertension is characterized by vascular remodeling in association with smooth muscle cell proliferation of the arterioles, medial thickening, and plexiform lesion formation. Despite our recent advances in understanding its pathogenesis and related therapeutic discoveries, PH still remains a progressive disease without a cure. Nevertheless, development of drugs that specifically target molecular pathways involved in disease pathogenesis has led to improvement in life quality and clinical outcomes in patients with PAH. There are presently more than 12 Food and Drug Administration–approved vasodilator drugs in the United States for the treatment of PAH; however, mortality with contemporary therapies remains high. More recently, there have been exuberant efforts to develop new pharmacologic therapies that target the fundamental origins of PH and thus could represent disease-modifying opportunities. This review aims to summarize recent developments on key signaling pathways and molecular targets that drive PH disease progression, with emphasis on new therapeutic options under development.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), particularly direct factor Xa inhibitors, have been associated with prolongation of the prothrombin time and the international normalized ratio (INR). Although DOACs do not require monitoring, elevations in the INR have been reported in in vitro and observational studies. The literature surrounding the extent of elevation and the clinical significance is limited. The objective of this study was to quantify the degree of INR elevation in hospitalized patients receiving apixaban. This was a single-center, retrospective, observational analysis of adult patients who received at least 1 dose of apixaban during their hospital admission and had at least 1 INR sample collected prior to and following administration. The major end point of this study was to characterize the effect of apixaban on the INR by determining the percentage of patients with an INR higher than our laboratory defined normal (defined as INR > 1.1). Minor end point outcomes included the incidence of an INR increase >0.3 from baseline INR and additional patient-specific factors that may influence INR elevation. Seventy-nine patients were included in the analysis. On day 1 of therapy, the median (interquartile range, IQR) INR was 1.4 (1.3:1.6) with 84.5% of patients having an elevated INR. The median (IQR) INR increased to 1.5 (1.4:1.6) and 1.7 (1.5:1.9) on day 4 and day 7, respectively. Of patients whose INR increased by more than 0.3, the median (IQR) change in INR from baseline was 0.5 (0.4:0.6). Apixaban is associated with a notable increase in INR in hospitalized patients, although it is not clear the clinical impact of the increase. Although literature does not support monitoring INR as a marker of apixaban activity, it is important for clinicians to understand the association apixaban has on the INR to avoid inappropriate interpretation of routine coagulation assays.

P2Y₁₂ receptor-blocking drugs given at reperfusion offer protection against myocardial infarction in animal models of transient coronary occlusion. Two recent reports concluded that ticagrelor was more cardioprotective than clopidogrel and attributed this to ticagrelor’s unique ability to raise tissue adenosine by blocking the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1. Indeed, an adenosine receptor blocker attenuated ticagrelor’s protection. The related P2Y₁₂ inhibitor cangrelor, which does not block the transporter, protects hearts only when platelets are in the perfusate, while adenosine is known to protect equally in situ blood-perfused and crystalloid-perfused isolated hearts. We, therefore, tested whether ticagrelor liberates a sufficient amount of adenosine to protect a Krebs buffer-perfused isolated rat heart subjected to 40 minutes of global ischemia followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. In untreated hearts, 77.6% ± 4.0% of the ventricle was infarcted as measured by triphenyltetrazolium staining. Ischemically preconditioned hearts had only 32.7% ± 3.6% infarction (P < .001 vs untreated), indicating that our model could be protected by preconditioning which is known to involve adenosine. Strikingly, hearts treated with 10 μmol/L ticagrelor in the buffer throughout the reperfusion period had 77.5% ± 2.4% infarction comparable to unprotected controls (P = NS vs untreated). These data strongly suggest that ticagrelor was unable to release sufficient adenosine from the crystalloid-perfused rat heart to protect it against infarction. Our previous studies have found no difference in the anti-infarct potency among clopidogrel, cangrelor, and ticagrelor in open-chest rats and rabbits, and surprisingly adenosine receptor antagonists block protection from all 3 drugs. We have no explanation why ticagrelor is more protective in the pig than clopidogrel but suspect a species or perhaps a treatment schedule difference that may or may not involve adenosine.