Hospital Pharmacy

These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them at your inservice training programs.

Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Medication Errors Reporting Program. Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers' names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below.

Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported directly to ISMP through the ISMP Web site (www.ismp.org), by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE, or via e-mail at ismpinfo@ismp.org. ISMP guarantees the confidentiality and security of the information received and respects reporters' wishes as to the level of detail included in publications.

The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discuss methods of prevention, and promote reporting of ADRs to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) MedWatch program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting, preventable ADR to MedWatch, please consider sharing the account with our readers.

The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires that pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparing, dispensing, and administering antineoplastic therapy and to the agents, commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

This Hospital Pharmacy feature is extracted from Off-Label Drug Facts, a quarterly publication available from Wolters Kluwer Health. Off-Label Drug Facts is a practitioner-oriented resource for information about specific drug uses that are unapproved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This new guide to the literature enables the health care professional or clinician to quickly identify published studies on off-label uses and determine if a specific use is rational in a patient care scenario. A summary of the most relevant data is provided, including background, study design, patient population, dosage information, therapy duration, results, safety, and therapeutic considerations. References direct the reader to the full literature for more comprehensive information before patient care decisions are made. Direct questions or comments regarding Off-Label Drug Uses to hospital pharmacy@drugfacts.com.

Because of its activity against multidrug resistant gram-positive organisms, vancomycin is one of the antimicrobials most utilized in health care systems worldwide. Despite its widespread use, application of the pharmacodynamic principles governing vancomycin efficacy are not frequently considered in contemporary clinical practice. Although the vancomycin trough serum concentration has been used historically to assess the adequacy of a prescribed dose, data validating that this practice leads to improved patient outcomes do not exist. Alternatively, both in vitro and clinical outcomes data demonstrate improved results when an area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) of 400 mcg•h/mL or greater is achieved. This article describes the process through which individualized vancomycin dosing regimens targeting an AUC/MIC of 400 mcg•h/mL or greater, rather than trough serum concentration, at the beside can be derived. The equations, methodology, thought processes, benefits, potential pitfalls, and practical applicability of this method are specifically examined. Obtaining the actual MIC value—not an interpretation—from the microbiology laboratory and/or the MIC distribution for Staphylococcus aureus within one's own institution is essential for implementation of this method. Although vancomycin dosing recommendations suggested in contemporary practice guidelines are likely adequate for most patients, using the methods described here may lead to improved clinical outcomes for nonstandard conditions in patients who are critically ill and would benefit from an individualized dosing approach.

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing inservices. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The September 2009 monograph topics are dronedarone, prasugrel, ferumoxytol injection, canakinumab injection, and ibuprofen injection. The DUE is on dronedarone.

This monthly feature will help readers keep current on new drugs, new indications, dosage forms, and safety-related changes in labeling or use. Efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this information; however, if there are any questions, please let us know at hospitalpharmacy@drugfacts.com.

The recent death of a well-known physician prompted a look at telehealth—specifically telepharmacy—in this installment. We begin with a discussion of the connection between telehealth and the physician. Telehealth is then addressed, looking briefly at the past and touching on several current telepharmacy activities.

The Director's Forum series is written and edited by Michael Sanborn and Robert Weber and is designed for guiding pharmacy leaders in establishing patient-centered services in hospitals and health systems. Another specific goal of this column is addressing many of the key challenges that pharmacy directors currently face, while also providing information that will foster growth in pharmacy leadership and patient safety. Previous articles in this series have discussed the many different aspects of pharmacy management and leadership challenges. This feature addresses the impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the Stimulus Program) on hospital pharmacy practices.

Hospital Pharmacy presents this feature to keep pharmacists abreast of new publications in the medical/pharmacy literature. Articles of interest regarding a broad scope of topics are abstracted monthly.