
Letter
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them at your inservice training programs. Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Medication Errors Reporting Program. Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers’ names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below. Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported directly to ISMP through the ISMP Web site (www.ismp.org), by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE, or via e-mail at
The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discuss methods of prevention, and promote reporting of ADRs to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) MedWatch program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting, preventable ADR to MedWatch, please consider sharing the account with our readers.
In 2001, the landmark trial of early goal-directed therapy versus standard care for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock was published. The marked decrease in mortality with early recognition of sepsis and quantitative resuscitation revolutionized the treatment of patients with these conditions. Specific pieces of the early goal-directed therapy protocol have not been routinely adopted into bedside care; however, early administration of antibiotics, resuscitation with intravenous fluids, and attainment of hemodynamic stability to achieve end-organ perfusion have become the standard of care. To help ensure all patients receive optimal therapy at the first signs of severe sepsis or septic shock, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign has developed a core set of initial process steps and treatment goals grouped into a care bundle. Recognizing the benefit of early quantitative resuscitation on patient care, the National Quality Forum adopted a severe sepsis and septic shock care bundle that is similar to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle. This care bundle has been adopted by the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, with reimbursement to be influenced beginning in 2017. The purpose of this review is to summarize evidence supporting the sepsis quality measure and care bundle and simplify key components of the care bundle where pharmacists can be impactful in ensuring optimal patient care and bundle compliance.
Until 2010, the vitamin K antagonist warfarin was the only available oral anticoagulant for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the United States. Despite its proven efficacy, the use of warfarin is limited by numerous disadvantages, including a delayed onset of action and variable efficacy resulting from interactions with genetic and environmental factors. Consequently, optimal anticoagulation with warfarin requires dose adjustments based on frequent monitoring. In contrast to warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have predictable pharmacokinetic profiles, few drug-drug interactions, no known interactions with food, and can be administered at fixed doses without the requirement for routine monitoring. All DOACs have received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the prevention of stroke or SEE in patients with NVAF and the treatment of VTE based on phase 3 trials demonstrating that they are at least as efficacious as warfarin. In addition, the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding associated with DOACs is comparable to or lower than with warfarin. In this article, the preclinical and clinical data that led to the FDA approval of once-daily edoxaban in January 2015 are presented. Furthermore, practical considerations for edoxaban use including dosing recommendations, transitions of care, reversal of anticoagulation, precautions, contraindications, and cost-effectiveness are discussed. Edoxaban is an important addition to oral anticoagulation options available for the therapeutic management of patients with NVAF or VTE.
The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.
This

A local quality initiative to improve compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis measures resulted in a high percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within minutes of surgical incision. Studies examining the association between timing of prophylaxis and the risk for surgical site infection (SSI) have produced heterogeneous results.
To examine risk factors for SSI, including “just in time” dosing of antibiotic prophylaxis (dose administered within 5 minutes of incision).
This was a retrospective matched case-control study. Case patients developed SSI in the 30 days following a clean or clean-contaminated surgical procedure. Control patients did not develop SSI following similar procedures and were matched to ensure comparable baseline risk. We assessed the rate of guideline-compliant antibiotic prophylaxis and calculated odds ratios (ORs) to determine the association of patient covariates with the risk for SSI.
Forty case patients and 104 controls were included in the study. The rate of appropriate prophylaxis was high in both groups (98% and 94% for case and control groups, respectively). Approximately 15% of case and control patients received antibiotic prophylaxis within 5 minutes of incision, thus, “just in time” dosing did not appear to increase the risk for SSI (OR, 0.814; 95% CI, 0.274–2.415). There was a nonsignificant association between receipt of vancomycin and SSI (OR, 2.844; 95% CI, 0.926–8.737).
“Just in time” dosing of prophylactic antibiotics was not associated with increased risk for SSI. Further study is needed to clarify the impact of antibiotic choice on the risk for subsequent SSI.
Interruptions in the pharmacy setting by nurses are common. While the source of nurse-generated interruptions may be variable, the appropriateness of these interruptions remains unknown.
To evaluate the impact and appropriateness of nursing interruptions on pharmacist workflow resulting from telephone calls, alphanumeric pagers, and in-person interactions.
An electronic data collection tool was created to record nursing-based interruptions of pharmacists through telephone calls, pages, and in-person interactions. The data were collected during all pharmacist shifts (day, evening, and night) over 14 days in 2 separate, 7-day data collection periods in December 2011 and January 2012. The data collection form comprised 7 questions that addressed the purpose of this study, including the shift; unit location; type, nature, and appropriateness of the interruption; estimated time spent; and whether the interruption was duplicated.
A total of 3,531 interruptions were documented during the 14 days of data collection; an average of 252 data points per day were recorded by the pharmacists. About 55% of the interruptions were initiated through alphanumeric pagers, 33% from phone calls, and 12% from face-to-face interactions. Sixty-three percent of the total interruptions were annotated as appropriate interruptions, while 37% of were annotated as inappropriate interruptions. The total time spent addressing the interruptions deemed inappropriate was 75 hours during the study period.
Distinct opportunities exist for process improvement changes, as well as educational and behavioral changes, that would greatly benefit nursing and pharmacy staff.
Job shadowing is an excellent way to learn more about the pharmacy profession. The shadowing individuals gain a greater sense of the role pharmacists play in the health care team and are exposed to the variety of roles that are filled by pharmacists. Job shadowing is also an important way for pharmacists to demonstrate the value of the profession and recruit talented individuals to their institution. However, there are several important considerations to ensure that the shadowing experience is beneficial for the individual, is a positive experience for the sponsor, and is compliant with the host institution's policies and procedures. The goal of this article is to prepare a potential host site for developing and maintaining a successful job shadow experience.
Due to a lack of necessary monitoring with rivaroxaban, patients have fewer opportunities for education, adherence reinforcement, and follow-up. If rivaroxaban is taken incorrectly, patients are at increased risk for adverse events. The objective was to create personalized rivaroxaban patient adherence kits (R-PAKs) to enhance successful transition from 15 mg twice daily to 20 mg once daily on day 22 of venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment.
A review of rivaroxaban drug information and existing medication adherence tools was completed to increase understanding of ways to improve adherence. Clinical pharmacists identified several concerns the R-PAK should address, including patient understanding of correct dose, administration timing, serious adverse effects, and importance of compliance, along with loss to follow-up by a health care provider. In the pilot phase, 100 R-PAKs were created. Each kit includes an educational handout describing adverse effects, administration, and monitoring; a reminder card with dosing information, date to transition, and emergency contact information; and a personalized 28-day pill organizer containing customized dividers to correlate with the first 21 days of treatment. Color-coded stickers denote the first day of starting twice-daily therapy upon discharge and the day of transition to once-daily dosing. The items were distributed in tote bags at discharge along with pharmacist education.
The R-PAKs are being used at a community teaching hospital for patients newly diagnosed with VTE who are discharged on rivaroxaban. The concept of a personalized medication box could be modified for any medication that requires high compliance or dose transitions.
To describe a case of successful treatment of methicillin-resistant
A 53-year-old female with a past medical history of cancer (unknown source/type) and hypothyroidism was admitted to the hospital with cervical and paravertebral abscess with suspected sepsis. In the emergency department (ED), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed possible spinal abscess and narrowing of the spinal canal. The patient was initiated on vancomycin 1,250 mg (~15 mg/kg) every 12 hours and cefepime 2 g every 8 hours empirically. On hospital day 4, blood and wound cultures revealed MRSA susceptible to vancomycin, but with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2. Repeat blood cultures were also positive on hospital days 2 and 4. Per infectious disease team consult, therapy was converted to daptomycin 8 mg/kg/day. Although the patient responded well, acute kidney injury (AKI) on hospital day 15 prompted a change in therapy to ceftaroline fosamil 400 mg intravenous every 8 hours. For the remainder of the hospital stay, blood cultures were negative and white blood cell count was within normal limits. On day 20, the patient was discharged to a long-term care facility for continued ceftaroline treatment.
The management of MRSA bacteremia remains challenging due to increasing antimicrobial resistance. Although the standard therapy for serious MRSA infections is vancomycin, treatment failures are becoming common in clinical practice due to increasing MICs (≥2 μg/mL). Other therapies may include daptomycin and off-label treatment with telavancin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, or ceftaroline fosamil. This report describes a patient with paravertebral abscess and MRSA bacteremia failing 3 days of vancomycin therapy due to MIC greater than or equal to 2 μg/mL and persistent bacteremia. Treatment with ceftaroline fosamil was well tolerated and resulted in continued clinical improvement. Based on this case report, ceftaroline fosamil may be a reasonable alternative for invasive MRSA infections.
This case report describes successful treatment of MRSA bacteremia with ceftaroline in a patient who responded poorly to conventional therapy, specifically vancomycin due to an elevated MIC (2 μg/mL).
Each month, subscribers to
This monthly feature will help readers keep current on new drug, new indications, dosage forms and safety-related changes in labeling or use. Efforts have been made to assure the accuracy of this information; however, if there are any questions, please let us know at
Leaders in health-system pharmacy are challenged to minimize costs, maximize revenue, and maintain or improve quality while simultaneously expanding services. Strong command of productivity and workload measurement is necessary to achieve these goals. This article reviews foundational pharmacy productivity concepts and key terminology, reviews historical pharmacy productivity models and their limitations, and considers new and evolving pharmacist productivity models.
We have mentioned the need for a multidisciplinary app in health care in at least 3 of our previous columns. We have also written about the Internet of Things (IoT) and how this exploding technology change will impact us all. In case you need a refresher, we believe that there are 5 new rights in health care that can be supported by mobile connectivity.