The International Journal of Robotics Research

Physical human–robot interaction implies the intersection of human and robot workspaces and intrinsically favors collision. The robustness of the most exposed parts, such as the hands, is crucial for effective and complete task execution of a robot. Considering the scales, we think that the robustness can only be achieved by the use of energy storage mechanisms, e.g. in elastic elements. The use of variable stiffness drives provides a low-pass filtering of impacts and allows stiffness adjustments depending on the task. However, using these drive principles does not guarantee the safety of the human due to the dramatically increased dynamics of such system. The design methodology of an antagonistically tendon-driven hand is explained. The resulting hand, very close to its human archetype in terms of size, weight, and, in particular, grasping performance, robustness, and dynamics, is presented. The hyper-actuated hand is a research platform that will also be used to investigate the importance of mechanical couplings and, in future projects, be the basis of a simplified hand that would still perform daily manipulation tasks.

Variable stiffness actuators (VSAs) are currently explored as a new actuation approach to increase safety in physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) and improve dynamic performance of robots. For control purposes, accurate knowledge is needed of the varying stiffness at the robot joints, which is not directly measurable, nonlinearly depending on transmission deformation, and uncertain to be modeled. We address the online estimation of transmission stiffness in robots driven by VSAs in antagonistic or serial configuration, without the need for joint torque sensing. The two-stage approach combines (i) a residual-based estimator of the torque at the flexible transmission, and (ii) a recursive least squares stiffness estimator based on a parametric model. Further design refinements guarantee a robust behavior in the lack of velocity measures and in poor excitation conditions. The proposed stiffness estimation can be easily extended to multi-degree-of-freedom (multi-DOF) robots in a decentralized way, using only local motor and link position measurements. The method is tested through extensive simulations on the VSA-II device of the University of Pisa and on the Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness (AwAS) of IIT. Experiments on the AwAS platform validate the approach.

Enabling robots to safely interact with humans is an essential goal of robotics research. The developments achieved over recent years in mechanical design and control made it possible to have active cooperation between humans and robots in rather complex situations. For this, safe robot behavior even under worst-case situations is crucial and forms also a basis for higher-level decisional aspects. For quantifying what safe behavior really means, the definition of injury, as well as understanding its general dynamics, are essential. This insight can then be applied to design and control robots such that injury due to robot–human impacts is explicitly taken into account. In this paper we approach the problem from a medical injury analysis point of view in order to formulate the relation between robot mass, velocity, impact geometry and resulting injury qualified in medical terms. We transform these insights into processable representations and propose a motion supervisor that utilizes injury knowledge for generating safe robot motions. The algorithm takes into account the reflected inertia, velocity, and geometry at possible impact locations. The proposed framework forms a basis for generating truly safe velocity bounds that explicitly consider the dynamic properties of the manipulator and human injury.

In recent years there has been a concerted effort to address many of the safety issues associated with physical human–robot interaction (pHRI). However, a number of challenges remain. For personal robots, and those intended to operate in unstructured environments, the problem of safety is compounded. In this paper we argue that traditional system design techniques fail to capture the complexities associated with dynamic environments. We present an overview of our safety-driven control system and its implementation methodology. The methodology builds on traditional functional hazard analysis, with the addition of processes aimed at improving the safety of autonomous personal robots. This will be achieved with the use of a safety system developed during the hazard analysis stage. This safety system, called the safety protection system, will initially be used to verify that safety constraints, identified during hazard analysis, have been implemented appropriately. Subsequently it will serve as a high-level safety enforcer, by governing the actions of the robot and preventing the control layer from performing unsafe operations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the design, a series of experiments have been conducted using a MobileRobots PeopleBot. Finally, results are presented demonstrating how faults injected into a controller can be consistently identified and handled by the safety protection system.

During social interaction humans extract important information from tactile stimuli that can improve their understanding of the interaction. The development of a similar capability in a robot will contribute to the future success of intuitive human–robot interaction. This paper presents a thin, flexible and stretchable artificial skin for robotics based on the principle of electrical impedance tomography. This skin, which can be used to extract information such as location, duration and intensity of touch, was used to cover the forearm and upper arm of a full-size mannequin. A classifier based on the ‘LogitBoost’ algorithm was used to classify the modality of eight different types of touch applied by humans to the mannequin arm. Experiments showed that the modality of touch was correctly classified in approximately 71% of the trials. This was shown to be comparable to the accuracy of humans when identifying touch. The classification accuracies obtained represent significant improvements over previous classification algorithms applied to artificial sensitive skins. It is shown that features based on touch duration and intensity are sufficient to provide a good classification of touch modality. Gender and cultural background were examined and found to have no statistically significant effect on the classification results.

This work presents the concept of tele-impedance as a method for remotely controlling a robotic arm in interaction with uncertain environments. As an alternative to bilateral force-reflecting teleoperation control, in tele-impedance a compound reference command is sent to the slave robot including both the desired motion trajectory and impedance profile, which are then realized by the remote controller without explicit feedback to the operator. We derive the reference command from a novel body–machine interface (BMI) applied to the master operator’s arm, using only non-intrusive position and electromyography (EMG) measurements, and excluding any feedback from the remote site except for looking at the task. The proposed BMI exploits a novel algorithm to decouple the estimates of force and stiffness of the human arm while performing the task. The endpoint (wrist) position of the human arm is monitored by an optical tracking system and used for the closed-loop position control of the robot’s end-effector. The concept is demonstrated in two experiments, namely a peg-in-the-hole and a ball-catching task, which illustrate complementary aspects of the method. The performance of tele-impedance control is assessed by comparing the results obtained with the slave arm under either constantly low or high stiffness.

Since the strict separation of working spaces of humans and robots has experienced a softening due to recent robotics research achievements, close interaction of humans and robots comes rapidly into reach. In this context, physical human–robot interaction raises a number of questions regarding a desired intuitive robot behavior. The continuous bilateral information and energy exchange requires an appropriate continuous robot feedback. Investigating a cooperative manipulation task, the desired behavior is a combination of an urge to fulfill the task, a smooth instant reactive behavior to human force inputs and an assignment of the task effort to the cooperating agents. In this paper, a formal analysis of human–robot cooperative load transport is presented. Three different possibilities for the assignment of task effort are proposed. Two proposed dynamic role exchange mechanisms adjust the robot’s urge to complete the task based on the human feedback. For comparison, a static role allocation strategy not relying on the human agreement feedback is investigated as well. All three role allocation mechanisms are evaluated in a user study that involves large-scale kinesthetic interaction and full-body human motion. Results show tradeoffs between subjective and objective performance measures stating a clear objective advantage of the proposed dynamic role allocation scheme.

This study proposes a new model for guiding people in urban settings using multiple robots that work cooperatively. More specifically, this investigation describes the circumstances in which people might stray from the formation when following different robots’ instructions. To this end, we introduce a ‘prediction and anticipation model’ that predicts the position of the group using a particle filter, while determining the optimal robot behavior to help people stay in the group in areas where they may become distracted. As a result, this article presents a novel approach to locally optimizing the work performed by robots and people using the minimum robots’ work criterion and determining human-friendly types of movements. The guidance missions were carried out in urban areas that included multiple conflict areas and obstacles. This study also provides an analysis of robots’ behavioral reactions to people by simulating different situations in the locations that were used for the investigation. The method was tested through simulations that took into account the difficulties and technological constraints derived from real-life situations. Despite these problematic issues, we were able to demonstrate the robots’ effect on people in real-life situations in terms of pushing and dragging forces.