
Research article
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal



To determine the effective components and the feasibility of collaborative care interventions (CCIs) in the treatment of depression in older patients.
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, in which CCIs were used to manage depression in patients aged 60 or older.
We identified 3 randomized controlled trials involving 3930 participants, 2757 of whom received CCIs and the others received usual care. Collaborative care interventions were more effective in improving depression symptoms than usual care during each follow-up period. Compared with baseline, thoughts of suicide in subjects receiving CCIs significantly decreased (odds Ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.35−0.77), but not that in those receiving usual care (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.50−1.43). Subjects receiving CCIs were significantly more likely to report depression treatment (including any antidepressant medication and psychotherapy) than those receiving usual care during each follow-up period. Collaborative care interventions significantly increased depression-free days, but did not significantly increase outpatient cost. At 6 and 12 months postintervention, compared with those receiving usual care, participants receiving CCIs had lower levels of depression symptoms and thoughts of suicide. Moreover, participants receiving CCIs were significantly more likely to report antidepressant medication treatment, but were not significantly more likely to report psychotherapy. Collaborative care interventions with communication between primary care providers and mental health providers were no more effective in improving depression symptoms than CCIs without such communication.
Collaborative care interventions are more effective for depression in older people than usual care and are also of high value. Antidepressant medication is a definitely effective component of CCIs, but communication between primary care providers and mental health providers seems not to be an effective component of CCIs. The effect of psychotherapy in CCIs should be further explored.
Posttransplant hyperlipidemia increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rate in renal transplant recipients. It also leads to graft loss due to atherosclerosis and glomerular damage. It is essential to control hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients to prevent these events.
In our study, we determined lipid profiles in 59 renal transplant recipients. Twenty of the recipients had hyperlipidemia; 9 had type IV, and 11 had type II hyperlipoproteinemia. Randomly selected 14 of 20 hyperlipidemic patients consisted of the diet group and were treated with American phase 3 diet for 1 month. Randomly selected 6 of the 20 hyperlipidemic patients received their regular diet as the control group. Five diet-resistant patients in the American phase 3 diet group were given diet plus placebo for another 1 month and then they were given diet plus Gemfibrozil (600 mg twice a day) for 2 months.
Lipid profile was normalized in 9 of the 14 patients on American phase 3 diet. The lipid profile of 5 patients in the American phase 3 diet group did not change significantly after 1-month diet. These 5 diet-resistant patients were given diet plus placebo for another 1 month, and their lipid levels again did not change significantly. Afterward, they were treated with Gemfibrozil (600 mg twice a day) plus American phase 3 diet for 2 months. At the end of this therapy period, their cholesterol level and triglyceride level decreased significantly. No change was observed in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
We conclude that American phase 3 diet and/or Gemfibrozil are effective in controlling posttransplant hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients.
Tendon abnormalities, such as increased stiffness, thickness, and excess calcification, occur commonly in patients with diabetes mellitus and cause considerable disability. These changes are frequently attributed to increased cross-linking of extracellular matrix components by advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). However, cellular effects of AGEs, such as increased activity of the cross-linking transglutaminase (Tgase) enzymes, could also contribute to altered tissue biomechanics and calcification in diabetic tendons. We determined the effect of AGE-modified protein on tenocyte Tgase activity.
Primary porcine tenocytes were exposed to Nε- carboxymethyl-lysine (CML)-modified type I collagen in high or normal glucose media. Protein and mRNA levels of the Tgase enzymes and Tgase activity levels were measured, as were markers of apoptosis. We also determined the effect of antioxidants on CML-collagen mediated Tgase activity.
Carboxymethyl-lysine-collagen increased Tgase activity in tenocytes 2.3- to 5.6-fold over unmodified collagen controls in both normal and high glucose media, without altering enzyme protein levels. Anti-oxidant treatment reduced the effect of CML-collagen on Tgase activity. Deoxyribonucleic acid laddering and annexin V protein levels were not altered by CML-collagen exposure.
Carboxymethyl-lysine-collagen increased Tgase activity in tenocytes, likely posttranslationally. Increased levels of Tgase-mediated cross-links may contribute to the excess calcification and biomechanical pathology seen in diabetic tendons.


The rise of interdisciplinary research programs in recent years has spawned numerous questions regarding the best way to organize interdisciplinary programs and how to best train new interdisciplinary scientists in ways that will catalyze novel discoveries in biology. Systems biology, a relatively new branch of science, can be considered in many respects a poster child for modern interdisciplinary science. It not only requires that people from different traditional disciplines work closely together but it also requires the development of unique training environments to educate the next generation of systems biologists. The unique scientific and training challenges associated with the development of systems biology are certainly faced across the spectrum of interdisciplinary endeavors. Therefore, it is useful for scientists interested in building interdisciplinary research programs to consider the merits of successful systems biology initiatives. Institute for Systems Biology is one such example, and in the following, several key aspects of Institute for Systems Biology that make it both a unique and successful interdisciplinary science and training center are discussed.
The National Institutes of Health's Clinical and Translational Science Award program has had a profound impact upon the way research is conducted at the University of California, Davis. University of California, Davis was among the first cohort of 12 institutions to receive National Institutes of Health funding for this award, and created its Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC) in 2006. The presence of a CTSC has led us to develop new ways of bringing together and supporting researchers from diverse fields, and the CTSC has impacted on virtually every area and infrastructure resource involved in supporting clinical and translational research at our institution.
Following is a portion of the proceedings of the panel and audience discussion from the AFMR-Translational Medical Research Development Workshop at EB08.

