Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal
One hundred and fifteen patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis took part in a double-blind, multicentre, clinical trial designed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of ampicillin and minocycline hydrochloride, a new, long-acting, semi-synthetic tetracycline.
Both antibiotics were equally successful in treatment, there being no statistically significant difference between the two in any of the parameters studied.
The therapeutic efficacy of tinidazole administered over a two-day period was assessed in a group of patients with amoebic rectocolitis and compared to the activity of metronidazole administered to a test group, with the same condition, over the same period of time at equivalent dosage. Twenty patients participated in the study and were randomly assigned to two groups of ten. The therapeutic efficacy of both drugs was similar at equivalent doses, however tinidazole was quicker in healing the distal and proximal colonic lesions caused by the vegetative forms of the parasite.
Constant efficacy at the fixed once-daily dosage was obtained with no signs of tolerance. No significant adverse effects or other signs of toxicity to mazindol were encountered. Extensive clinical evaluation of this drug in relation to the established anorectics is strongly recommended.
A significant decrease in the articular uptake was found only in the group of patients treated with diftalone. The differences relative to diftalone were also statistically significant when the results were analyzed comparatively.
These results are very similar to other studies of the same type using other beta-blockers, but the side-effect frequency seems to be lower with alprenolol. This is corroborated by comparative official side-effect reporting over seven years for different beta-blockers.
Anafranil was well tolerated; no abnormalities were observed in the laboratory investigations.
Three familiar commercial nasal decongestants were compared in a doubleblind trial using patients suffering from acute rhinitic conditions. Variables measured were quantity of medication used within a given period of time, onset of action, frequency of application and duration of action.
It was shown that in a given period of time the use of one trial product was significantly lower than that of the two other products with regard to establishing and maintaining free nasal breathing. There were indications that special biopharmaceutical factors in a product could control patients' self-dosage of the preparation thereby improving the risk/benefit relation considerably.
Another important conclusion was that the patient himself could handle a medicine reasonably and responsibly thereby providing valuable additional data for evaluation of a product under trial (consumer orientated research).