Journal of Biological Rhythms

Like virtually all other physiological control systems, the sympathetic nervous system controlling cardiovascular function is characterized by the presence of rhythmic activity. These include slow rhythms with frequencies at or below that of the respiration and rapid rhythms with frequencies at or above that of the heart beat. The rapid rhythms are the subject of this review. The specific questions entertained are as follows: (1) Are the rapid cardiac-related and 10-Hz rhythms inherent to central sympathetic networks, or are they imposed on sympathetic nerve discharge (SND) by extrinsic periodic inputs? (2) Does basal SND arise from an anatomically circumscribed “vasomotor center” composed of pacemaker neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla or from an anatomically distributed network oscillator composed of different types of brainstem neurons, none of which necessarily have intrinsic pacemaker properties? (3) Are the rapid rhythms generated by single circuits or by systems of coupled oscillators, each with a separate target? (4) Are the rapid rhythms in SND simply by-products of the sympathetic generating mechanisms, or do they subserve selective and special functions, such as the formulation of differential patterns of spinal sympathetic outflow that support particular behaviors? The controversial aspects of these issues and the state-of-the-art analytical methods used to study them are stressed in this review.

The effects of different light regimes on the fitness of organisms have typically been studied using mean or median adult life span as the sole index of physiological well-being. It is, however, known that life span is inversely related to reproductive output in many species. Moreover, the effects of a given environmental treatment on life span can be due to effects on either age-independent mortality or the “rate of aging,” or a combination of both. Drawing evolutionary inferences from the effects of light regime on mean or median adult life span alone is difficult and, at best, speculative. We examined the effects of constant light (LL), alternating light-dark cycles (LD 12:12 h), and constant darkness (DD) on the life span of reproducing and virgin flies in four populations of Drosophila melanogaster and also estimated lifetime fecundity in the three light regimes. The light regime effects on life span were further dissected by examining the age-independent mortality and the Gompertz rate of aging under the three light regimes. While mean adult life span of reproducing males and females and virgin females was significantly shorter in LL compared to LD 12:12 and DD, lifetime egg production was highest in LL. Life span of virgin males was not significantly affected by light regime. The rate of aging in reproducing females was higher in LL as compared to DD, whereas age-independent mortality was higher in DD. As reproductive output, especially early in life, is a far more significant contributor to fitness than is life span, our results suggest that the earlier reported deleterious effects of LL on fitness are partly an artifact of examining life span alone, without considering other components of adult fitness that trade off with life span. Our results suggest that detailed investigation of the effects of light regime on the physiological and behavioral processes that accompany reproduction is necessary to fully understand the effects of different light regimes on adult fitness in Drosophila.

We have characterized a decrease in photic responsiveness of the mammalian circadian entrainment pathway caused by light stimulation. Phase delays of the running-wheel activity rhythm were used to quantify the photic responsiveness of the circadian system in mice (C57BL/6J). In an initial experiment, the authors measured the responsiveness to single “saturating” light pulses (“white” fluorescent light; [.approxequal]1876 [.mu]W; 15 min). In two additional experiments, the authors measured responses to this stimulus at several time points following a saturating pulse at CT 14 or CT 16. Data from these experiments were analyzed in two manners. Experiment 2 was analyzed assuming that the phase of the circadian pacemaker was unchanged by an initial pulse, and Experiment 3 was analyzed assuming that the initial pulse induced an instantaneous phase delay. Results reveal a significant reduction in responsivity to light that persists for at least 2 h and possibly up to 4 h after the initial stimulus. Immediately after the stimulus, the responsiveness of the photic entrainment pathway was reduced to levels [.lessequal] 12% of normal. After 2 h, the responsiveness was [.lessequal] 42% of normal, and by 4 h, responsiveness had recovered to levels that were [.lessequal] 60% of normal (levels not statistically different from controls). By the following circadian cycle, responsiveness was more completely recovered, although the magnitude of some phase delays remained [.lessequal] 85% of normal. These major reductions in the magnitude of phase delays (and phase response curve amplitude) caused by saturating light pulses confound interpretations of two-pulse experiments designed to measure the rate of circadian phase delays. In addition, the time course for this reduced responsiveness may reflect the time course of cellular and molecular events that underlie light-induced resetting of the mammalian circadian pacemaker.

In this study, the authors asked whether pinealectomy or temporary exposure to a stimulatory photoperiod affects the timing of spontaneous testicular recrudescence in adult Siberian hamsters chronically exposed to short days (9:15 light:dark). In Experiment 1, hamsters were pinealectomized after 6, 9, or 12 weeks in short days. Pinealectomy after 9 or 12 weeks did not affect the timing of spontaneous gonadal growth (27.7 ± 1.9 and 25.4 ± 1.3 weeks, respectively) compared to sham-operated controls (28.6 ± 0.9 weeks). Enlarged testes occurred earlier in animals that were pinealectomized after 6 weeks in short days (21.8 ± 2.1 weeks). In Experiment 2, adult hamsters were exposed to short days for 9 weeks, transferred to long days (16:8 light:dark) for 4 weeks, and then returned to short days for 23 additional weeks. Although long-day interruption caused gonadal growth in 15 out of 19 hamsters, the temporary long-day exposure did not affect the timing of spontaneous gonadal growth following return to short days (28.2 ± 0.9 weeks) in 10 of the 15, relative to the timing observed in control hamsters continuously maintained in short days (28.2 ± 1.1 weeks). Four out of 19 hamsters did not show gonadal growth following long-day exposure. Spontaneous gonadal growth in these hamsters (28.0 ± 1.4 weeks) also occurred at the same time as controls. The remaining 5 hamsters exhibited enlarged testes following long-day exposure (12.0 ± 0.0 weeks) but were refractory to the second short-day exposure. All hamsters exhibited entrainment of wheel-running activity following the change in photoperiod. Afinal group of 13 animals were pinealectomized before long-day transfer. They exhibited gonadal growth (at 17.2 ± 0.8 weeks) but failed to regress a second time when returned to short days. The timing of gonadal growth in these animals was delayed relative to the sham-operated hamsters temporarily transferred to long days (Experiment 2) but accelerated relative to the hamsters pinealectomized at 9 weeks, which remained continuously in short days (Experiment 1). The results of both experiments suggest that a pineal-independent process mediates the timing of spontaneous gonadal growth in Siberian hamsters chronically exposed to a short-day photoperiod.

Siberian hamsters are photoperiodic rodents that typically exhibit several physiological changes when exposed to a short-day photoperiod. However, development of the winter phenotype in short days is largely conditional on prior photoperiod history: Hamsters that have been reared in an exceptionally long day length (18 L) do not usually exhibit the winter phenotype after transfer to short days, whereas animals reared under “moderately” long days (16 L) are more variable in responsiveness to subsequent short-day exposure, with 20% to 30% generally failing to exhibit winter-type responses. Hamsters reared exclusively in an “intermediate” day length (14 L) are almost uniformly responsive to short photoperiod. In the present study, the authors examine the influence of photoperiod history on short-day responsiveness in a breeding line of hamsters that has been subjected to artificial selection for resistance to the effects of short days. The results demonstrate that photoperiod history is an important determinant of short-day responsiveness in both random-bred (UNS) hamsters and animals artificially selected and bred for nonresponsiveness to short photoperiod (PNR). The PNR hamsters have a reduced requirement for long-day exposure to evoke a state of unresponsiveness to short days. The results are discussed in relation to possible significance for the origin of population and species differences in photoperiod responsiveness.

Photoperiod influences the distribution of sleep and waking and electroencephalogram (EEG) power density in the Djungarian hamster. In an experimental procedure combining short photoperiod (SP) and low ambient temperature, the light-dark difference in the amount of sleep was decreased, and the changes in slow-wave activity (SWA) (mean EEG power density between 0.75 and 4.0 Hz) in nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep within 24 h were abolished. These findings, obtained in three different groups of animals, suggested that at the lower ambient temperature, the influence of the circadian clock on sleep-wake behavior was diminished. However, it remained unclear whether the changes were due to the photoperiod, ambient temperature, or both. Here, the authors show that EEG and electromyogram recordings in a single group of animals sequentially adapted to a short and long photoperiod (LP) at low ambient temperature (~15 °C) confirm that EEG power is reduced in SP. Moreover, the nocturnal sleep-wake behavior and the changes in SWAin NREM sleep over 24 h were restored by returning the animals to LP and retaining ambient temperature at 15 °C. Therefore, the effects cannot be attributed to ambient temperature alone but are due to a combined effect of temperature and photoperiod. When the Djungarian hamster adapts to winter conditions, it appears to uncouple sleep regulation from the circadian clock.

The authors' previous experiments have shown that dawn simulation at low light intensities can phase advance the circadian rhythm of melatonin in humans. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of repeated dawn signals on the phase position of circadian rhythms in healthy participants kept under controlled light conditions. Nine men participated in two 9-day laboratory sessions under an LD cycle 17.5:6.5 h, < 30:0 lux, receiving 6 consecutive daily dawn (average illuminance 155 lux) or control light (0.1 lux) signals from 0600 to 0730 h (crossover, random-order design). Two modified constant routine protocols before and after the light stimuli measured salivary melatonin (dim light melatonin onset DLMOn and offset DLMOff) and rectal temperature rhythms (midrange crossing time [MRCT]). Compared with initial values, participants significantly phase delayed after 6 days under control light conditions (at least –42 min DLMOn, –54 min DLMOff, –41 min MRCT) in spite of constant bedtimes. This delay was not observed with dawn signals (+10 min DLMOn, +2 min DLMOff, 0 min MRCT). Given that the endogenous circadian period of the human circadian pacemaker is slightly longer than 24 h, the findings suggest that a naturalistic dawn signal is sufficient to forestall this natural delay drift. Zeitgeber transduction and circadian system response are hypothesized to be tuned to the time-rate-of-change of naturalistic twilight signals.