JDR Clinical & Translational Research

While the oral health of persons with dementia has been shown to be poor, no systematic reviews have been published that examined the topic in depth, including participants with dementia representing the full spectrum of disease severity, and evaluating a broad scope of oral health assessments. The aim of this study was to conduct a current literature review to fill this gap in knowledge. A systematic search of 5 databases (CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science) was conducted to identify all relevant studies published up to May 2016. There were no exclusions related to study type, severity of dementia, dentate status, or living arrangements. Results were reported descriptively and summarized. Meta-analyses were performed where possible and reported as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Twenty-eight studies were identified. Assessments were conducted of tooth status, active dental caries, hygiene (plaque/calculus) of natural and artificial teeth, periodontal diseases, denture status (retention, stability, denture-related mucosal lesions), and oral health–related quality of life. Across all evaluations, persons with dementia generally had scores/results suggestive of poor oral health. In meta-analyses, compared with persons without dementia, those with dementia had a significantly fewer number of teeth (MD, −1.52; 95% CI, −0.2.52 to −0.52; P = 0.003; n = 13 studies), more carious teeth (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.48; P = 0.028; n = 9), significantly worse oral hygiene evaluated using a broad range of assessment tools (SMD, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.19, P < 0.0001; n = 7), and significantly poorer periodontal health (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.70; P = 0.02; n = 6 studies). The oral health status of persons with mild to severe forms of dementia, who were living in both the community and residential care facilities, was found to be poor across a broad range of dental assessments.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study define the scope of oral issues and quantify the degree of impairment in individuals with dementia, evaluated using a variety of oral health measures. The results revealed that poor oral health is associated with dementia.

An aging and more racially and ethnically diverse population, coupled with changes in the health care policy environment, is demanding that the dental profession both redirect and expand its focus. Challenges include providing comprehensive care for patients with complicated medical needs while improving access to care for underserved groups. The purpose of this study is to examine the acceptability of screening for hypertension and diabetes in the dental setting for African American, Puerto Rican, and Dominican older adults who attend senior centers in northern Manhattan, New York City. Focus groups were conducted with 194 racial/ethnic minority men and women aged 50 y and older living in northern Manhattan who participated in 1 of 24 focus group sessions about improving oral health for older adults. All groups were digitally audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Groups that were conducted in Spanish were transcribed first in Spanish and then translated into English. Analysis of the transcripts was conducted using thematic content analysis. Five themes were manifest in the data regarding the willingness of racial/ethnic minority older adults to receive hypertension and diabetes screening as part of routine dental visits: 1) chairside screening is acceptable, 2) screening is routine for older adults, 3) the interrelationship between oral and general health is appreciated, 4) chairside screening has perceived benefits, and 5) chairside screening may reduce dental anxiety. Reservations centered on 4 major themes: 1) dental fear may limit the acceptability of chairside screening, 2) there is a perceived lack of need for dental care and chairside screening, 3) screening is available elsewhere, and 4) mistrust of dental providers as primary care providers. This study provides novel evidence of the acceptability of screening for hypertension and diabetes in the dental setting among urban racial/ethnic minority senior center attendees.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study may be used by oral health providers when deciding whether to conduct chairside screening for medical conditions such as hypertension and diabetes that could affect, or be affected by, the oral health of their patients. Patient experiences of care—along with clinical outcomes, avoidable hospital admissions, equity of services, and costs—are important outcomes to consider in meeting the needs of an aging and racially and ethnically diverse US population.

The objective of the study was to examine the mediating effect of child dental use on the effectiveness of North Carolina Early Head Start (EHS) in improving oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL). In total, 479 parents of children enrolled in EHS and 699 parents of Medicaid-matched children were interviewed at baseline when children were approximately 10 mo old and 24 mo later. In this quasi-experimental study, mediation analysis was performed using the counterfactual framework analysis, which employed 2 logit models with random effects: 1) for the mediator as a function of the treatment and covariates and 2) for the outcome as a function of the treatment, mediator, and covariates. The covariates were baseline dental OHRQoL, dental need, survey language, and a propensity score. We used in-person computer-assisted, structured interviews to collect information on demographic characteristics and dental use and to administer the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale, a measure of OHRQoL. Dental use had a mediation effect in the undesired direction with a 2–percentage point increase in the probability of any negative impact to OHRQoL (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3%–3.9%). Even with higher dental use by EHS participants, the probability of any negative impact to OHRQoL was approximately 8 percentage points lower if an individual were moved from the non-EHS group to the EHS group (95% CI, −13.9% to −1.2%). EHS increases child dental use, which worsens family OHRQoL. However, EHS is associated with improved OHRQoL overall.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: Study results can inform policy makers that comprehensive early childhood education programs improve oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) for disadvantaged families with young children in pathways outside of clinical dental care. This awareness and its promotion can lead to greater resource investments in early childhood education programs. Information about the negative impacts of dental use on OHRQoL should lead to the development and testing of strategies in dentistry and Early Head Start to improve dental care experiences.

Common equipment in the dental operatory generate cumulative noise at sufficient decibel levels that can damage hearing. Although noise exposure in the dental office is typically intermittent, dentists and other dental care providers have been shown to be at risk of hearing loss. This article provides dentist-generated insight to use when incorporating hearing protection devices during dental practice. Four hearing protection devices (HPDs) were provided to 15 dentists in randomized sequence for evaluation. Perceptions were gathered via questionnaires and analyzed to determine mean ratings and product preferences. Battery requirements of electronic HPDs were also examined. Qualitative assessments of the HPDs evaluated are presented, including dentist preferences and recommendations. There were statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.0031) among the HPDs in terms of ease of insertion, aesthetics, ability to hear while using a handpiece, and the openness of the ear. Battery life was not found to differ between the 2 electronic HPDs evaluated. Dentists most highly valued ease of hearing, ability to communicate, and comfort while wearing HPDs. The DI-15 High-Fidelity Electronic Earplugs HPD was ranked the highest, followed by Music PRO Electronic Earplugs. Battery longevity for these electronic HPDs was similar under all tested conditions studied.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: Dentists should understand the potential ramifications of hearing loss and be aware that there are commercially available hearing protection products that preserve the ability to communicate with patients and coworkers.

This prospective cohort study investigated the relationship between patient neuroticism and oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) before and after prosthetic treatment as well as changes in OHRQoL—namely, treatment efficacy. Sixty-three patients (23 men and 40 women; mean age 67.2 ± 8.6 years), who were scheduled to receive new removable partial dentures (RPDs), were recruited. OHRQoL was assessed using the Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-J). The Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) was used to assess neuroticism. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the association between neuroticism and OHIP-J scores before and after treatment. After stratifying patients according to neuroticism score, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for intragroup comparison of OHIP-J scores before and after treatment. Moreover, logistic regression analysis was used to determine the impact of covariates on treatment efficacy such as age, sex, Eichner classification, neuroticism, changes in maximal occlusal force, and OHIP-J scores before treatment. Statistical analyses showed that higher neuroticism scores were associated with higher total OHIP-J scores before treatment (r = 0.41, P = 0.001) but were not associated with OHIP-J scores after treatment (r = 0.07, P = 0.566). When the effect of all independent variables was analyzed in multivariate analysis, neuroticism and OHIP-J scores before treatment affected treatment efficacy. These results suggest that OHRQoL of patients with higher levels of neuroticism was low before prosthetic treatment but significantly improved by oral rehabilitation with RPDs to the same level as patients with lower levels of neuroticism.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study may change the clinical perception of the effect of prosthetic rehabilitation with removable partial dentures in patients with higher levels of neuroticism. The study concluded that prosthetic rehabilitation could contribute toward satisfaction even in neurotic patients, who are presumed to show less satisfaction with their oral status.

The objective was to investigate the role of employment in the 11-y changes of clinically determined oral health. We used data from the longitudinal Health 2011 Survey, including reinvited subjects from the Health 2000 Survey. Data were gathered by clinical oral examinations, interviews, and questionnaires of those aged 30 to 63 y (n = 1,031) in 2000. Exposures were change in employment from baseline to follow-up and length of unemployment. Outcomes measures were the numbers of missing teeth, sound teeth, filled teeth, decayed teeth, and teeth with periodontal pockets (≥4 mm and ≥6 mm). Separate mixed-effects and conventional negative binomial regression models were fitted for each oral health outcome. Demographic, socioeconomic, and oral health–related behaviors were added as covariates to the analyses. The findings showed that unemployment was inconsistently associated with poorer clinically determined oral health over 11 y. These effects were attributed to income and education and, to a lesser extent, to oral health–related behaviors. The length of unemployment was also inconsistently associated with oral health. The study concluded that one socioeconomic factor, unemployment, had a partial impact on oral health.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: The findings of this study can help clinicians and oral health policy makers to reorient oral health services toward those who are unemployed as a risk group for poor oral health. The research highlights the role of employment in the longitudinal changes of clinically determined oral health, taking into consideration other socioeconomic factors. The study concluded that unemployment seemed to have a role in social inequalities of oral health.

Caesarean section has been shown to affect the health of the child. Only a few studies have investigated whether the mode of delivery is associated with dental caries, and they present conflicting results. Our study investigated whether dental caries was associated with delivery method in Swedish preschool children. This retrospective register-based cohort study included all children born from 2000 to 2003 who were residing in Stockholm County, Sweden, at 3 y of age (n = 83,147). The study followed the cohort until individuals were 7 y of age. Children examined at 3 and 7 y constituted the final study cohort (n = 65,259). We dichotomized the key exposure “delivery starts by caesarean section” and analyzed it in univariate analyses as well as in multivariate analyses. The multivariate analyses used 3 outcomes: caries experience at age 3 (deft >0 [decayed, extracted, and filled teeth]), caries increment between 3 and 7 y of age (Δdeft > 0), and caries experience at age 7 (deft > 0). Of the final cohort, 15% (n = 9,587) were delivered by caesarean section. At 3 y of age, the results showed no statistically significant association between caesarean section and caries experience (odds ratio = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 1.04). Between 3 and 7 y of age, the association of caesarean section on caries increment was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.83 to 0.94) and at 7 y of age, 0.88 (caries experience; 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.94). Higher mean values for caries experience and caries increment were observed in vaginally delivered children. We found that preschool children who were delivered by caesarean section do not represent a group with an excess risk of developing dental caries. Furthermore, the statistically significant associations with caries increment and caries experience at age 7 were negative.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: Children born by caesarean section are at greater risk of developing asthma and obesity. The proportion of elective caesarean sections without a medical indication has increased over the years; therefore, it is important to know how this mode of delivery affects oral health of the child. The results show that children who are delivered by caesarean section are not at greater risk of developing dental caries, and clinicians can use these findings in their risk assessment.

The aim of this study was to compare the levels of in vivo chemical degradation sustained by bisphenyl-glycidyl-dimethacrylate (bisGMA)–based and urethane-modified bisGMA-based resin composites. A cohort of 58 patients was recruited for the study. Human salivary esterase activity (HSDE) was measured for each patient prior to restoration placement. Class V or III composite restorations without occlusal contacts were placed in adult patients using a 3-step adhesive (Scotchbond MP, 3M) and 1 of 2 resin composites: a traditional bisGMA-based (Z250; 3M) (n = 28) or a urethane-modified bisGMA-based composite (TPH Spectra, Dentsply) (n = 30). Patients followed a 2-min rinse (saline containing 20% ethanol) protocol before, immediately after, and 7 days after restoration placement. The rinse samples were analyzed for the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) and bishydroxypropoxyphenylpropane (bisHPPP), a bisGMA breakdown product, using high-performance liquid chromatography in combination with mass spectrometry. The overall mean ± standard error (SE) HSDE activity was 23.4 ± 1.9 U/mL, with no statistical difference between the Z250 (22.6 ± 2.8 U/mL) and TPH (24.1 ± 2.1 U/mL) groups (P = 0.69). BPA was not detected from any rinse samples. BisHPPP was detected from both composites only in rinse samples immediately after resin composite placement (0.59 µg/mm² ± 0.16 and 0.68 µg/mm² ± 0.16 for Z250 and TPH, respectively, P = 0.767). There was no statistically significant correlation between HSDE and amount of bisHPPP obtained from the saliva for the Z250 group (r = 0.071, P = 0.723), TPH group (r = 0.266, P = 0.155), and both groups combined (r = 0.080, P = 0.549). Conventional commercial resin composite materials used in the current study did not release any detectable amount of BPA and only showed detectable levels of bisHPPP for a short term after placement, suggesting that hydrolytic consumption of any available resin substrate is fast and the generated products are rapidly diluted below the detection level limit (<20 ppb) in the oral cavity. This short-term release of bisHPPP was not significantly affected by material type or esterase level in the saliva.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: This clinical study demonstrated that the duration and degree of biodegradation of 2 representative formulations of resin composites was limited in both duration and amounts of detectable matrix derived degradation products. No significant level of potential biohazards was released following the application of the resin composites. The results of this study can help oral care professionals address concerns from their patients about possible health issues regarding the application of resin composite restorative materials.

Knowledge Transfer Statement: Preventing early childhood caries in American Indian children has proved to be an unexpectedly challenging goal. Biological and behavioral variables, as well as parental psychosocial characteristics and experiences, suggest new routes for understanding and mitigating the progress of disease. We provide our reflections after a decade of studying these issues in collaboration with tribal communities.

Rosier BT, van Loveren C, Zaura E, Loos BG, Keijser BJF, Crielaard W, Lagerweij MD. 2017. Caries incidence in a healthy young adult population in relation to diet. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2(2):142-150. (Original DOI: 10.1177/2380084416683340)

This article was printed in the April 2017 issue of the JDR Clinical & Translational Research with the fourth author, B.G. Loos, omitted. The online version of this article has been corrected to accurately reflect B.G. Loos’s authorship: Dr. Loos’s name was added as the fourth author in the byline, his affiliation was added to the footnotes (Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), and his contributions were added to the Author Contributions at the end of the article.