Nutrition issues facing people with cancer are significant. The role of
nutrition therapy is often assumed to be less important than pharmacologic
interventions as outcomes are less clear in the literature. Especially
important has been the focus on traditional outcomes such as morbidity and
mortality rather than adopting a more patient-centered approach and including
quality of life as a key outcome. There is a general failure to recognize
weight loss early enough and to implement nutrition interventions, which are
effective. The nutrition intervention should be composed of both a
prescription and an implementation method. To achieve compliance, the
nutrition therapy should be implemented in an aggressive manner. Data show
that when compliance is achieved, outcomes in the form of improved quality of
life and functional capacity can be achieved. For people with cancer and their
care-givers, outcomes such as quality of life have meaning, and for patients
with poor prognoses, this may hold more meaning than mortality and morbidity
outcomes. Clinicians need to implement triage systems to identify patients for
early intervention and focus on nutrient combinations. They need to be
confident that with the right prescription and implementation, nutrition
therapy can be successful and bring real benefit to patients with cancer.