Perception

Translations of Müller-Lyer's two papers on visual illusions, “Optical illusions” (1889) and “Concerning the theory of optical illusions: On contrast and confluxion” (1896), are accompanied by a brief biographical note and a commentary.

The assumed role of peripheral distortion mechanisms in both wings-in and wings-out Müller-Lyer illusions was investigated by requiring subjects to reproduce the central extent of standard Müller-Lyer figures and dot variations. Illusory magnitude of the line and dot variations was also examined with increasing wing length and wing angle. A reduction in the overestimation for the wings-out illusion occurred with the removal of intersecting lines; the dot variations evidenced a significant overestimation effect. In contrast, no reliable decrease in underestimation was found with the removal of intersecting lines in the wings-in illusion, and both standard and dot variations were significantly underestimated. These results support a conclusion that the wings-in and wings-out Müller-Lyer illusions are two distinct illusions, and may be differentially determined at the loci of distortion within the visual system.

Parallel changes in illusory magnitude were noted with configural manipulations of standard and dot wings-out illusions. However, standard and dot forms of the wings-in illusion were not equivalently affected by equivalent configural manipulations, which suggests that they are different illusions. Thus, the use of the wings-in dot variation to separate empirically peripheral from nonperipheral distortion mechanisms may be ill-advised.

In the standard version of the Poggendorff figure a transversal intersects two parallel verticals and the segment of the transversal between the two intersection points, A and B, is not shown. The two portions of the transversal outside the parallels then seem to be misaligned. Besides this illusion of direction, there is also an illusion of size, the distance AB being underestimated in the standard figure. The influence of configural components in determining this spatial distortion of the Poggendorff figure was examined by having subjects reproduce the inner oblique (at 45°) extent AB in variations of the figure. This distance was found to be underestimated in Poggendorff variations which contained parallel (vertical) components that formed an acute angle with AB; and the underestimation increased as the number of these components present in the figure increased. The distance AB was found not to be significantly distorted in figures which contained only those parallel (vertical) components that formed an obtuse angle with AB, yet their presence in the figure tended to counteract the underestimation. When the transversals were omitted, the underestimation was found to increase. The findings are interpreted in support of an explanation that reduces the Poggendorff effect to those factors which mediate the Müller-Lyer illusion.

An experiment is reported which confirms and extends a previous finding that amputations of the Poggendorff figure do not necessarily result in large positive effects with obtuse-angle stimuli, and small or even negative effects with acute-angle stimuli. Indeed, the acute-angle effects found were significantly greater than the obtuse-angle effects, and the full Poggendorff error was not explicable in terms of the linear summation of the component-angle effects. An ‘alignment displacement effect’ reported earlier by Hotopf and Obonai was shown to occur, but could not be an important component of the Poggendorff illusion.

Substantial rotatory induced movement and aftereffects associated with induced movement were observed in a large static patterned disc bounded at its periphery by a rotating patterned annulus. The area of the annulus was less than one tenth that of the disc, so its peripheral location seemed to be important in eliciting these phenomena. This was confirmed in two experiments comparing a peripheral annulus and a relatively central annulus in their ability to elicit induced movement and aftereffects in the same large static field. Aspects of the vection (induced self-movement) phenomenon may have been involved in generation of induced movement. This suggested that the motion-inducing properties of the peripheral annulus might have derived from: (i) its eccentric location in the perceiver's visual field; or (ii) its location with regard to the display itself. Two further experiments showed that (ii) was important for the elicitation of both induced movement and the aftereffects, and (i) was important for the elicitation of induced movement. Neurons responsive to relative movement in conjunction with lateral inhibition may provide a partial explanation for these effects. However, they do not explain why the visual system can assign considerable movement to a large static field under the conditions of these experiments.

The authors have earlier found support for the notion that apparent motion (AM) is mediated by a low-pass temporal-frequency filter operating over the spatial domain of the AM sources. Experiments have been carried out to test how this response is changed, or unchanged, through varying the source intensities or contrasts. The results indicate no intensity or contrast effects on the spatiotemporal limits for AM. These results are related to the early formulations of Korte and indicate that there is no amplitude-modulation or contrast-sensitivity function for AM—as there is for threshold movement detection. The filter mechanism seems to be largely restricted to the spatiotemporal domain.

The effects of reducing the range of spatial perception on the accuracy of visually guided locomotion were studied in two experiments. Limiting the range of perception to only near objects produces changes in the flow of stimulus detail and reduces opportunities for the appearance of an aiming point and for motion parallax. Such conditions were found to produce inferior performance compared to full vision, or to minimal background information. A defined aiming point was also found to assist control when no other background was present. The results are discussed with reference to theories of locomotor control and the design of artificial spatial sensing aids for the blind.

The term ‘illusory contours' refers to contours perceived where none physically exist. Three hypotheses that have been successful in their ability to account for this phenomenon invoke: (i) apparent depth; (ii) brightness contrast; and (iii) use of figural cues. An experiment has been designed to determine the extent to which each hypothesis accounts for the overall variation in subjects' responses to illusory contours when all three hypotheses are considered simultaneously. Experimental results suggest that different processes may assume a primary role in the perception of illusory contours depending upon the type of inducing area and the configuration. The results highlight the multifaceted nature of the processes involved, and indicate that no single theory can explain the perception of illusory contours.

The perceived lightness of grey bars within grey–white and grey–black square-wave test gratings was measured in the presence of different surrounding regions (plain black, plain white, or black–white square-wave gratings). The results for the grey–white test gratings are explained in terms of three separate processes: (i) lightness contrast; (ii) lightness assimilation resulting from the limited ability of the visual system to deal with grating contrast at higher spatial frequencies; and (iii) lightness assimilation resulting from lateral inhibition between pattern detecting channels mediating the perception of the gratings in the test regions and the surrounds. The results for the grey–black test gratings were explained without reference to the third process. It is concluded that techniques involving lightness assimilation could provide investigators with a sensitive new method of investigating the specificities of the inhibitory interactions underlying pattern perception.

Observations are reported with the side-by-side presentation of rotating Necker cubes and other well-known reversible (ambiguous) figures. The fact that the two representations can be seen in the opposite direction of rotation, or perspective, at the same time is regarded as a serious difficulty for the cognitive or decisional interpretations of the spontaneous alternations in these figures. It is suggested that separate and fatiguable cortical ‘channels' are a more likely basis for the dual-presentation effect than multiple decisional or attentional processes. The relationship between this proposal and recent research consistent with the visual system as a multichannel processor is noted.