Perception

The characteristics of the sustained input to directionally selective motion sensors were examined in three human psychophysical studies on directional-motion discrimination. Apparent motion was produced by displaying a group of dots in two frames (F1 and F2), where F2 was a translated version of F1. All stimuli included parts that contained both F1 and F2 (combined images) and parts containing only F1 or F2 (single images). All displays began with a single image (F1), continued with the combined image, and ended with F2. Six durations of single and of combined images (10, 20, 40, 80, 160, or 320 ms) were crossed factorially. As the duration of the single image was increased, perception of directional motion first improved, and then declined at longer durations. This outcome contrasted with the monotonic increment obtained in earlier studies under low-luminance conditions. To account for the entire pattern of results, earlier models of the Reichardt motion sensor were modified so as to include a mixed transient – sustained input to one of the filters of the sensor. Predictions from the new model were tested and confirmed in two experiments carried out under both low-luminance and high-luminance viewing conditions.

D'Zmura, and Bauer, Jolicoeur, and Cowan demonstrated that a target whose chromaticity was linearly separable from distractor chromaticities was relatively easy to detect in a search display, whereas a target that was not linearly separable from the distractor chromaticities resulted in steep search slopes. This linear separability effect suggests that efficient colour visual search is mediated by a chromatically linear mechanism. Failure of this mechanism leads to search performance strongly influenced by number of search items (set size). In their studies, linear separability was confounded with distractor heterogeneity and thus the results attributed to linear separability were also consistent with the model of visual search proposed by Duncan and Humphreys in which search performance is determined in part by distractor heterogeneity. We contrasted the predictions based on linear separability and on the Duncan and Humphreys model by varying the ratios of the quantities of the two distractors and demonstrated the potent effects of linear separability in a design that deconfounded linear separability and distractor heterogeneity.

Exception is taken to the conclusion that the terrestrial-passage theory ignores the immediacy of the experience of the moon illusion and is therefore to be rejected. The meaning of immediacy and the definition of the illusion as a horizon enlargement are examined critically. In demonstrating that immediacy is not ignored, the passage theory is restated, with special attention to potential tests of the theory in explaining individual differences and related phenomena.

It is well known that when humans have to decide whether two differently oriented shapes are identical or mirror images their performance deteriorates as a function of the orientation disparity (mental-rotation effect). Here it is shown that the effect can also be obtained reliably with non-mirror-image, arbitrarily different polygons provided they are previously selected to be hard to discriminate. The slope of the decision speed versus orientation disparity functions was found to be inversely related to the discriminability of shapes under conditions of no, ie 0°, orientation disparity. Easily discriminable polygon pairs yielded essentially flat, no-effect functions. The arbitrary polygons that were more difficult to discriminate produced a rotation effect that was similar to those of mirror-image polygon pairs. Mirror images in this context may only be a special case of hard-to-discriminate stimuli. We also show that the speed of judging whether simple lines were of the same or different length was similarly subject to a rotation effect provided that the length differences were sufficiently small, ie when their baseline dicriminability was poor enough. It is suggested that the mental rotation of complex shapes (eg polygons) may build on rotation effects pertaining to the simpler elements of which they are composed. Further, some special effects associated with the rotation of such simpler components may explain certain peculiarities apparent in orientation invariance functions obtained with complex stimuli.