Perception

Motion can impair the perception of other visual changes. Suchow and Alvarez (2011a, Current Biology, 21, 140–143) recently demonstrated a striking ‘motion silencing’ illusion, in which the salient changes among a group of objects' luminances (or colors, etc) appear to cease in the presence of large, coherent object motion. To understand why the visual system might be insensitive to changes in object luminances (‘flicker’) in the presence of object motion, we constructed similar stimuli and did a systematic spectral analysis of them. We conducted human psychophysical experiments to examine motion silencing as a function of stimulus velocity, flicker frequency, and spacing; and we created a simple filter-based model as a working hypothesis of motion silencing. From the results, we found that the threshold of silencing occurs when the log frequency of object replacement is roughly one quarter of the log flicker frequency (the mean slope is approximately 0.27). The dependence of silencing on object spacing may be explained as a phenomenon of temporal sampling of the stimuli by the visual system. Our proposed model successfully captures the psychophysical data over a wide range of velocities and flicker frequencies.

The current study investigated the impact of stereoscopic depth information on adults' perception of a coloured version of the Munker–White illusion. In one half of the illusory figure red patches were embedded in black stripes and flanked by yellow stripes. In the other half of the illusory figure red patches were embedded in yellow stripes and flanked by black stripes. The red patches either remained in the same depth plane as the black and yellow inducing stripes (zero horizontal disparity condition) or were shifted into the foreground (crossed horizontal disparity condition) or into the background (uncrossed horizontal disparity condition). According to the results, the illusory effect was robust across all viewing conditions. The illusion mainly consisted of a subjective darkening of the red patches superimposed on the yellow stripes, a perceived hue shift of the red patches superimposed on the black stripes toward yellow, and a subjective saturation decrease in both kinds of red patches. Moreover, the study established a partial confirmation of Anderson's scission theory, according to which the Munker–White illusion should be largest in the crossed horizontal disparity condition, intermediate in the zero horizontal disparity condition, and smallest in the uncrossed horizontal disparity condition.

A behavioural advantage is found across a wide range of stimuli when two targets are presented in opposite hemifields compared with those targets being presented together in one hemifield, or one target being presented alone. This advantage for responses to multiple targets versus a single target is often termed redundancy gain. Here we report on the findings of two experiments investigating redundancy gain in binocular rivalry. Experiment 1 presented a rival pair in one hemifield with an additional image presented to both eyes in the opposite hemifield. There was a weak effect of this stable image on the perceived dominance of the images within the rival pair. Experiment 2 presented a second rival pair in either the same or opposite hemifield and showed that instances of joint predominance were greater when the two pairs were presented in opposite hemifields than within the same hemifield. Therefore, the findings suggest that redundancy gain may be extended to stimuli presented under binocular rivalry conditions.

A narrow bar or line (width around 1 arcmin) between two fields of which the luminances are sinusoidally and in counterphase modulated in time appears to make an oscillatory movement. It is possible to annihilate this illusory movement with a real movement and thus to analyze this phenomenon quantitatively. Confirming previous studies, the amount of illusory movement (amplitude typically 10 arcsec) was proportional to the modulation depth of the fields and inversely proportional to the line width and the line contrast. The amount of illusory movement increased with defocus, a lower mean luminance, and eccentricity. The experimental results could be explained by a model that includes a linear low-pass spatial filter. For a Gaussian spatial filter, the standard deviation as derived from the experimental results was 1.1 arcmin (1.0–1.3 arcmin) (median with range of four observers) for well-focused, photopic, foveal viewing. We explored various criteria for line localization in the model (extremes and zero-crossings of Gaussian derivatives).

The perception of faces is often considered to be unique in comparison with that of other objects in the world. The fact that faces are processed not by their constituent components but by the spatial configuration between those components (holistic face processing—HFP) is often used to support this. Despite two decades of research, however, there is no consensus as to whether or not HFP is a process that is subject to attentional modulation. Here, in two experiments, we used a method to direct spatial attention not previously used in studies of HFP—an exogenous spatial cue—as it offers a robust, rapid, and involuntary method of directing attention. In one experiment we demonstrate that the degree of HFP afforded to a face is not reduced when attention is directed away from that face. In a second experiment we replicate this finding even when the face is simultaneously flanked by other faces—a condition under which a face-specific processing module would, hypothetically, be more sensitive to attentional guidance. These results add to the argument that HFP is carried out independently of attention.

Perception of subtle facial expressions is essential for social functioning; yet it is unclear if human perceptual sensitivities differ in detecting varying types of facial emotions. Evidence diverges as to whether salient negative versus positive emotions (such as sadness versus happiness) are preferentially processed. Here, we measured perceptual thresholds for the detection of four types of emotion in faces—happiness, fear, anger, and sadness—using psychophysical methods. We also evaluated the association of the perceptual performances with facial morphological changes between neutral and respective emotion types. Human observers were highly sensitive to happiness compared with the other emotional expressions. Further, this heightened perceptual sensitivity to happy expressions can be attributed largely to the emotion-induced morphological change of a particular facial feature (end-lip raise).

This study analyses how certain qualitative perceptual appearances of biological forms are correlated with expressions of natural language. Making use of the Osgood semantic differential, we presented the subjects with 32 drawings of biological forms and a list of 10 pairs of connotative adjectives to be put in correlations with them merely by subjective judgments. The principal components analysis made it possible to group the semantics of forms according to two distinct axes of variability: Harmony and dynamicity. Specifically, the nonspiculed, nonholed, and flat forms were perceived as harmonic and static; the rounded ones were harmonic and dynamic. The elongated forms were somewhat disharmonious and somewhat static. The results suggest the existence in the general population of a correspondence between perceptual and semantic processes, and of a nonsymbolic relation between visual forms and their adjectival expressions in natural language.

Two meta-analyses were conducted to examine two potential sources of spatial orientation biases in human profile drawings by brain-intact individuals. The first examined profile facing direction as function of hand used to draw. The second examined profile facing direction in relation to directional scanning biases related to reading/writing habits. Results of the first meta-analysis, based on 27 study samples with 4171 participants, showed that leftward facing of profiles (from the viewer's perspective) was significantly associated with using the right hand to draw. The reading/writing direction meta-analysis, based on 10 study samples with 1552 participants, suggested a modest relationship between leftward profile facing and primary use of a left-to-right reading/writing direction. These findings suggest that biomechanical and cultural factors jointly influence hand movement preferences and in turn the direction of facing of human profile drawings.

Ophelia is a 19th century painting by John Everett Millais. It shows Ophelia with a blank look to encourage the viewer's own imagination (Rosenfeld & Smith, 2007, Millais. London: Tate Publishing). Using the face adaptation paradigm, we attempted to identify the subtle emotion a viewer might perceive from Ophelia's expression. Since adapting to an expression is known to lower the viewer's subsequent sensitivity to that expression, we hypothesized that adaptation to Ophelia would impair identification of a similar expression. Participants adapted to Ophelia's face before identifying expression of a schematic face that was variably morphed between a neutral expression and each of the six basic expressions. Results showed a selective impairment of identification for sadness, suggesting that sadness was what participants perceived. The study demonstrates that high-level adaptation can reveal aesthetic experience and its neural mechanisms.

The Thatcher Illusion is generally discussed as a phenomenon related to face perception. Nonetheless, we show that compellingly strong Thatcher Effects can be elicited with nonface stimuli, provided that the stimulus set has a familiar standard configuration and a canonical view. Apparently, the Thatcher Illusion is not about faces, and nor is it about Thatcher. It just might, however, be about Britain.