
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal



The incidence of oral cancer is rising in the UK. Mortality from the disease remains high and survival has not improved significantly in the last 30 years. The primary dental health team has an integral role in the delivery of oral health promotion and prevention advice and in the early detection of oral malignancy and potentially malignant lesions. Both prevention and early detection within the general dental practice setting have a potential impact on overall incidence, morbidity and mortality from oral cancer. This paper details the primary dental healthcare team's roles in delivering smoking cessation and alcohol reduction counselling, in the early detection by oral examination, and in the process of prompt referral.
Over the past ten years, a body of evidence has accumulated to suggest that aspects of oral health, particularly the extent and severity of periodontal disease, may be associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). This evidence should be seen against the background of a more general interest in the role of chronic infections in vascular disease. There have, for example, been suggestions of associations between CHD and a range of bacterial and viral agents, including



To investigate, by questionnaire, the direct restorative materials used by a sample of practitioners from the Unite d Kingdom.
A postal questionnaire was distributed to a group of self-selected practitioners, who volunteered to participate in the study. In all 110 practitioners participated in the study.
The most used material for the restoration of occlusal (Class I) and approximal (Class II) lesions was amalgam with 61% and 73% of practitioners indicating that they used amalgam in this situation. Adhesive tooth-coloured materials, specifically composites and compomers, were preferred by the majority of practitioners for anterior approximal (Class III) and incisal (Class IV) restorations with compomer preferred for Class V restorations including non-carious cervical lesions and for the restoration of primary teeth.
It is concluded that the general practitioners surveyed in this study tend to use amalgam for the restoration of Class I and II lesions as opposed to resin composite. The majority of practitioners in this study used compomers, a relatively new group of restorative materials, with little evidence of traditional glass-ionomer cements being used routinely.

Resin-retained bridges have been used clinically since the 1970s, and offer a more conservative approach to the restoration of edentulous spaces than conventional bridgework. They are easy to place, cheap to fabricate and have been shown to be cost-effective. Despite this, they are not frequently used in general dental practice and they have an undeserved reputation for failure.
Since their initial introduction, they have undergone a number of changes to their method of retention, and the materials used in their construction. This has resulted in a predictable, aesthetic restoration which, barring the use of implants, is often the treatment of choice where teeth adjacent to an edentulous space are minimally or not restored.
This article hopes to show the clinical techniques required to produce predictable resin-retained bridgework in general practice.



• To find out if local nursing/residential home managers are experiencing any problems in obtaining domiciliary dental care for residents.
• To assess the availability of local GDS and CDS dentists for domiciliary dental care for the elderly and the range of treatments offered.
Self-completing postal questionnaires distributed to 148 dentists and 80 nursing/residential home nurse managers.
71% of responding dentists undertook domiciliary visits but 43% of these were not accepting any new NHS domiciliary patients. Only 21% of those willing to visit would undertake any conservative treatment. Seventy per cent of nurse managers reported few problems in finding a NHS dentist, but the remaining 30% had found it difficult or impossible. Eighty-five per cent would find written guidelines helpful.
The number of elderly patients keeping natural teeth is steadily increasing. The rate of dental caries in institutionalised patients is significantly higher than those living in their own homes. The number of dentists in the area of this study who are accepting new domiciliary patients is rapidly decreasing and only one in five will provide conservative treatment. This is a deteriorating situation, which merits further investigation on a national scale and subsequent planning to address it.
With the problems of access to NHS primary dental care services in the last few years attention has focused on manpower considerations for dentistry.
This paper presents the results of a simple survey of general dental practitioners in South Staffordshire.
The response rate was 88%. Most dentists (76%) reported working over 30 hours a week. A small number reported working more than 50 hours a week. Woman dentists were more likely to report working fewer than 31 hours a week. Younger male dentists tended to work longer hours than older male dentists, whereas younger women dentists tended to work fewer hours than older women. The reported retirement plans suggested that around 16% of dentists in their 40s and 50s were planning to retire before 60.
The findings add weight to the view that woman dentists tend to work fewer hours but studies of cohorts are required to examine the impact of premature retirement and the reasons behind this apparent gender difference.