
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Since the original Grammont design of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty there has been a trend to decrease inclination angle from 155° to 145 or 135°. Furthermore, lateralization on the glenoid side has been advocated. These changes decrease the risk for impingement between humerus and the inferior part of the glenoid (notching). These changes were also made to improve restoration of rotation. However, there is very little evidence that rotation has improved due to these changes. A negative effect of lateralization is that it increases the risk for glenoid loosening. Furthermore, the stress on acromion increases which may lead to more acromion or scapula spine fractures. More randomized studies are needed to define optimal design of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Osteoporosis and osteopenia are frequently found in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, especially rotator cuff repair, and it is anticipated that this link will become more common as more elderly people have operations on their shoulders. For orthopedic surgical candidates who are at high risk, preoperative screening may identify those who might benefit from early intervention and prevent any associated adverse events. The major complications include repair failure and revision surgery. Antiresorptive medication preoperatively has shown good results
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) among patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).
Five databases were screened until December 18, 2022. The included RCTs were assessed for risk of bias, and the endpoints were summarized as mean difference/standardized mean difference (MD/SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model.
Seven RCTs with 510 patients (TXA = 261 and control/placebo = 249) were analyzed. The overall risk of bias was “low” and “unclear” in four and three RCTs, respectively. The mean operative time (n = 5 RCTs, MD = −9.64 min, 95% CI [−15.74, −3.54], p = 0.002) and mean postoperative pain score on postoperative day 1 (n = 5 RCTs, MD = −0.56, 95% CI [−1.06, −0.05], p = 0.03) were significantly reduced in the TXA group compared with the control group. However, there were no significant differences between both groups regarding visual clarity, amount of irrigation solution, and estimated intraoperative blood loss.
Among patients undergoing ARCR, preoperative TXA did not reduce intraoperative blood loss or improve visual clarity. However, TXA administration correlated with significant reductions (statistically) in operative time and postoperative day 1 pain score compared with the control group.
Conventional techniques for the fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures include the use of locking plates, intramedullary nailing, hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder replacement. Valgus-impacted fractures are a common subtype of proximal humeral fracture, but there are few publications concerning the outcomes of treatment. This study aims to review outcomes following an ‘all-suture’ technique for this fracture subtype without the use of transosseous sutures.
All patients over the age of 18 who presented with 3- or 4-part valgus-impacted proximal humeral fractures and who underwent ‘all-suture’ repair at our centre were included. We reviewed their post-operative imaging and collected data on post-operative complications and patient-reported outcome measures.
We identified 15 patients who had undergone all-suture fixation. The cohort's mean age was 56. Eleven patients were female. Eight patients had 3-part fractures and seven patients had 4-part fractures. There were no major post-operative complications. All fractures united. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score was 43.7 and the mean Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score was 85.9 at the final follow-up.
Our results suggest that all-suture fixation of proximal humeral fractures presents an attractive alternative to conventional techniques, whilst avoiding complications relating to metalwork implantation.
Anecdotally, upper truncal obesity and large breasts have often been associated with inferior outcomes from non-operative management of diaphyseal humerus fractures. However, this assertion is without basis in the literature.
To produce radiographic measurements of chest wall soft tissue thickness (STT) and determine association with non-union in diaphyseal humerus fractures.
Two hundred and seventeen consecutive non-operative humeral shaft fractures were included. Radiographic STT measurements were taken at three standardised points (upper, middle and lower) using a simple reproducible method, with ratios derived (dividing these figures by the mid-humerus diameter). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to assess association with non-union.
There were 58 (26.7%) cases of non-union. On multivariable analysis, the middle (odds ratio (OR) 1.39, p < 0.001) and lower (OR 1.23, p = 0.009) STT measurements were independently associated with non-union. Additionally, the middle (OR 1.85, p < 0.001) and lower (OR 1.47, p < 0.001) STT ratios were independently associated with non-union. A receiver operating characteristic curve determined a threshold value of a middle STT ratio of ≥ 3 (OR 3.73, p < 0.001, sensitivity 69.0%, specificity 62.3%), which was independently associated with non-union.
Chest wall STT is independently associated with humeral shaft non-union. Threshold values can assist in decision making for these fractures.
Age and sex are known predictors of isometric shoulder strength and therefore must be accounted for when noting strength values or administering assessments such as the Constant Score. Given the popularity of the Constant Score, it is important to ensure protocols and values remain clinically relevant and are representative of the intended population.
Isometric shoulder strength was recorded for 511 participants without shoulder pathology using the ChatillonTM hand-held dynamometer. Data were stratified by age and sex for comparison with published normative strength series. Other demographic variables were evaluated using linear regression models.
Normative values for shoulder strength were generated. Age (
This study generated normative shoulder strength values for a sample of the Australian population and provided a comparison between other normative scores. Significant demographic predictors in addition to age and sex were identified.
III.
The realities of midshaft clavicle fracture distribution have not been described accurately. Consequently, a topographical depiction of midshaft clavicle fractures may help design implants that are more anatomically concordant with the fractured clavicle, leading to better outcomes and fewer complications.
This is a retrospective cohort study. One-hundred sixty-six surgically treated midshaft clavicle fractures of four fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons were evaluated to determine the precise “location” of the fracture on standard radiographs. This location was determined by noting the lateral, central, and medial endpoint of each fracture, expressed as a percentage (0%–100%) of the distance from the lateral to the medial end of the clavicle.
Fractures on average began at the 36% line (SD = 6%), were centered at the 42% line (SD = 6%), and ended at the 48% line (SD = 7%). Ninety percent of fractures were centered lateral to the midpoint, and 64% were completely lateral to the midpoint. Thirty-two percent of midshaft fractures extended into the lateral third of the clavicle, but no fractures extended into the medial third.
Midshaft clavicle fractures in skeletally mature individuals appear to occur predominantly within the lateral metadiaphyseal half of the clavicle, and rarely extend into the medial third. Industry professionals and surgeons alike should consider this when designing and selecting implants. To note, our study relied on two-dimensional radiographs, and future studies should work on fully capturing the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the clavicle.
IV.
Patients were randomized to receive topical 5-ALA skin solution activated by blue light photodynamic therapy or standard of care preoperative skin preparation. Prior to skin incision, two punch biopsy specimens were taken from the portal sites and were incubated for 13 days. Culture positivity rate, days until positive, and semiquantitative growth classification were analyzed.
Fifty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized. The overall positive culture rate was 54%. All cultures were positive for
The use of photodynamic therapy undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery did not significantly reduce colonization of
Level II.
The primary aim of this survey was to capture current practice with regard to lifting limitations following elbow arthroplasty. An online survey was emailed to all members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. All consultant respondents who reported performing elbow arthroplasty were asked about their advice for post-operative lifting limitations. In total, 115 surveys were completed: 55 consultants reported performing linked total elbow arthroplasty, 18 reported performing unlinked total elbow arthroplasty and 44 reported performing distal humeral hemiarthroplasty. The majority of elbow consultants advise a lifelong lifting limitation following linked and unlinked total elbow arthroplasty (78% and 61% respectively). There was variation in the weight specified for lifelong lifting limitations, the median weight restriction in linked total elbow arthroplasty was 5 lb, and in unlinked total elbow arthroplasty was 10 lb (range 1−20 lb). In total, 13% of consultants performing linked total elbow arthroplasty and 33% of consultants performing unlinked total elbow arthroplasty do not advise any lifelong lifting limitations post-operatively. In a perceived attempt to prolong implant longevity, most surgeons recommend lifelong lifting limitations following total elbow arthroplasty. There is variation in the weight restriction advised by consultant elbow surgeons. Currently the optimal weight restriction to maximise implant longevity is not known and further work needs to be done to understand the true relationship between activity, loading and implant failure.
Distal biceps tendon (DBT) injuries are relatively uncommon. Controversies exist regarding the best approach, leading to variations in treatment. This study aims to understand the preferences and practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding management of DBT injuries, as well as assess the feasibility of a future pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of various surgical factors on patient outcomes.
A cross-sectional international survey was conducted amongst surgeons treating patients with DBT injuries. The survey included questions about treatment preferences, surgical techniques, case volumes, and interest in participating in a future RCT.
Responses from 491 orthopedic surgeons from 26 countries/territories were obtained. Most surgeons had limited exposure to DBT ruptures. Variations were observed in the work-up process, with some relying solely on clinical examinations while others used diagnostic imaging. A single incision approach was the most common surgical technique, and tendon fixation with suspensory cortical buttons was frequently preferred. Most surgeons did not explore or repair the bicipital aponeurosis. Interest in participating in a future RCT varied for different surgical controversies.
This survey provides valuable insights into surgeons’ preferences and practices for DBT injury management. The study highlights the need for standardization in the work-up process and the use of evidence-based guidelines. Current practices may be influenced by factors such as training, implant availability, and costs. The survey also identified surgeons and centers interested in collaboration for future multicenter trials, allowing for equitable access to surgical collaboration opportunities and addressing the lack of evidence in DBT rupture treatment.
Level V, expert-opinion.
Conservative management of displaced proximal humerus fractures involves a period of rest in a sling followed by physiotherapy. The aim of this review is to provide a narrative synthesis of how long immobilisation is used, types of slings, when and how exercises are introduced, and if complications may be associated with these components.
A systematic search of the literature was undertaken. Two researchers screened relevant articles using Covidence software, with a third reviewer consulted for consensus. Data was extracted and a narrative synthesis is presented.
Thirty-nine studies were included (3059 studies screened, 159 full-text reviews). This included a cohort of 2664 patients with a mean age of 70.9. Time immobilised in sling ranged from 1 to 6 weeks. Sling types were variable and were grouped into low, medium and higher levels of support. Exercises were introduced at variable timescales tending to introduce passive and pendular exercises first. Complications were reported in 243 incidences (9.1%).
There was vast variation in how long patients were immobilised for, types of slings used and when and how exercises were introduced and progressed. No relationship was found between complications and these components. Research to identify the most effective approach is required.
We describe a new technique for hydrodilatation of the frozen shoulder, which we coined ‘Sonographically-Navigated Frozen Shoulder Release (S-FSR)’ or ‘Dr Gonzalez's technique.’ Traditional treatments include a combination of conservative and surgical modalities, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, physical therapy, and open capsular release. We describe a modification to hydrodilatation of the frozen shoulder. Our technique describes the gradual dilation of the glenohumeral (GH) capsule with the goal of seeing a gentle release of the frozen shoulder. Furthermore, we outline our protocol for patient preparation with preprocedural diazepam 5 mg and Hydrocodone 5 mg-Acetaminophen 325 mg, one tablet each. During the procedure, we inject a solution of 10 mL lidocaine mixed with 2 mL of 40 mg/mL triamcinolone acetonide injection (80 mg total) through an anterior approach at the level of the rotator interval for pain control. Following this injection, we proceed to fenestrate the superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL) in the process. We conclude the procedure with hydrodilatation of the GH joint (GHJ) through the posterior approach with approximately 50 mL of 0.9% normal saline, or until an expansion and release of the GH joint is visualized under ultrasound visualization.
A full instruction video can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = ZNB0R0hkeok&ab_channel = DrJorgeA.Gonzalez