Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology

We reviewed randomized phase II/III trials comparing first- or second-line endocrine therapy as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapies for treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. First-line was defined as treatment for endocrine therapy-naïve advanced breast cancer or advanced disease treated with endocrine therapy in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting. Second-line was defined as endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer following disease progression on endocrine therapy for advanced disease. Publications reporting progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS) for FDA-approved agents anastrozole, exemestane, fulvestrant 250 mg, fulvestrant 500 mg, letrozole (0.5 and 2.5 mg), megestrol acetate, and tamoxifen as monotherapy, or in combination with everolimus, palbociclib or ribociclib, were assessed. First-line monotherapy with anastrozole, fulvestrant 500 mg or letrozole 2.5 mg significantly improved PFS/TTP versus comparator endocrine therapy; however, only fulvestrant 500 mg improved OS. For endocrine therapy in combination with targeted therapies, palbociclib plus letrozole 2.5 mg, and ribociclib plus letrozole 2.5 mg significantly improved PFS versus letrozole 2.5 mg alone first-line. For second-line monotherapies, exemestane, fulvestrant 500 mg and letrozole 2.5 mg significantly improved PFS/TTP versus comparator endocrine therapy; only fulvestrant 500 mg and letrozole 2.5 mg improved OS. For second-line combination therapies, everolimus plus exemestane, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant 500 mg, improved PFS versus endocrine therapy alone. In both first- and second-line settings, aromatase inhibitors demonstrated PFS benefits versus comparator endocrine therapy; however, fulvestrant 500 mg was the only endocrine therapy included in our review to show both PFS and OS advantages compared with other endocrine therapies. Targeted agents in combination with endocrine therapy have demonstrated PFS improvements both first- and second-line; OS data are awaited.

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in lung cancer patients. This condition may be related to many causes including incidental medications, concurrent diseases and side effects of antineoplastic treatments or the disease itself. Although not frequently life-threatening, it is usually associated with prolonged hospitalization, delays in scheduled chemotherapy, worsening of patient performance status and quality of life and may also negatively affect treatment response and survival. Most of the available data focus on thoracic tumors, especially small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), where hyponatremia is frequently related to the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). Few studies specifically focus on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Hyponatremia treatment needs to be personalized based on severity and duration of sodium serum reduction, extracellular fluid volume and etiology. However, literature data highlight the importance of early correction of the serum concentration levels. To achieve this the main options are fluid restriction, hypertonic saline, loop diuretics, isotonic saline, tolvaptan and urea. The aim of this review is to analyze the role of hyponatremia in lung cancer patients, evaluating causes, diagnosis, management and clinical implications.