
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal






PURPOSE
This survey was conducted to assess patient perceptions of glycemic control, convenience, and flexibility of a prescribed prandial oral therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS
Questionnaires distributed by physicians yielded baseline responses from 3696 patients who were beginning repaglinide treatment. Data were analyzed from 1233 respondents who also completed follow-up questionnaires after 4 weeks of treatment.
RESULTS
Among respondents, 60% were taking repaglinide with other antidiabetic agents in combination therapy; 59% were taking metformin, and 24% were taking troglitazone. Most respondents (84%) indicated that they were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with repaglinide therapy, 92% wished to continue its use, and 60% believed that the treatment had improved their attitude toward taking antidiabetic medication. Patients perceived that fasting blood glucose levels were reduced during treatment, as was the incidence of hyperglycemia. Corresponding changes in perceived frequency of hypoglycemia during repaglinide treatment were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS
Patient perceptions of prandial oral therapy with repaglinide were predominantly positive, due mostly to the perception that glucose control was achieved, with minimal perception of any increase in hypoglycemic episodes.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the attitudes of internal medicine physicians toward treating diabetes in different patient ethnic groups and compared with treating common chronic medical conditions in primary care.
METHODS
The survey instrument was administered to 55 internal medicine physicians. An e-mail message was sent to each physician with a hyperlink to a site where the survey could be completed. The instrument was a modified, quantitative 10-point scale designed to measure attitudes regarding the difficulty of treating diabetes.
RESULTS
Diabetes was perceived to be more difficult to treat than hyperlipidemia and angina. African Americans with diabetes were perceived to be more difficult to treat than Caucasian patients. Difficulty in treating diabetes was comparable to that for hypertension, arthritis, and congestive heart failure. Physicians were confident about treatment efficacy for diabetes and changing diabetes outcomes, but not about the adequacy of time and resources for diabetes treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Diabetes was perceived as a difficult disease to treat, African American patients were more difficult to treat, and time and resources were inadequate for diabetes treatment. To improve diabetes care, there is a need to address these attitudes and concerns of internal medicine physicians.
PURPOSE
This article examines the influence of various environmental factors on the diabetes self-care practices of African American adults with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS
A heuristic model was developed that considers how community barriers and supports, availability and use of insurance, diabetes education, medical provider-patient relationships, extended family processes, and psychological functioning may indirectly affect metabolic control through the patient's ability to regulate diabetes.
RESULTS
The proposed model offers a framework to demonstrate the complexity of diabetes management that may be unique to the African American experience.
CONCLUSIONS
A comprehensive view of the environmental context will lead to new and more effective approaches in diabetes education and counseling for African American adults with type 2 diabetes.
PURPOSE
The job analysis described in this report was conducted by the National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators (NCBDE) to (1) provide a basis for documenting the continuing validity of the certified diabetes educator examination (CDE), (2) define areas that should be assessed in future certification examinations, and (3) ensure that the content of certification examinations is job related.
METHODS
A diabetes educator job task list was developed and used to create a job analysis survey. The survey was distributed randomly to 1079 CDEs throughout the United States.
RESULTS
Of the 1079 surveys that were distributed, 327 were suitable for analysis, with relevant demographic subgroups adequately represented. An examination matrix and detailed content outline were constructed from the survey data that will be used by the NCBDE to assemble future test forms.
CONCLUSIONS
Specifications for the CDE examination were developed that were directly related to the important activities that diabetes educators perform. Future forms of the CDE examination will be matched to job-related, criterion-referenced test specifications and will have strong evidence of content validity. Future forms of the exam will contain 200 items at specified cognitive levels with a representative sampling of tasks within 4 core areas from the detailed content outline.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine the value of peer coaching and its influence on behavior change.
METHODS
Coaches who were known to be successfully managing their diabetes were paired with individuals who were struggling with behavior change associated with managing diabetes. The pairs were matched according to age, sex, and physical appearance. Coaches met initially with participants in a face-to-face meeting for 1 hour and talked with them once a week for 10 to 15 minutes for the next 8 weeks. The initial interview and subsequent phone conversations focused on the person's problems and efforts at behavior change.
RESULTS
At the end of the study, the pairs participated in a videotaped focus group to discuss their views on coaching and its influence on behavior change. Participants reported that coaching was personal, useful in disease management, and helpful in their quest to establish and adhere to routines of care. Participants also reported making progress toward changing their behavior related to diet, exercise, and blood glucose monitoring. Sustained behavior change was not measured.
CONCLUSIONS
Peer coaching appears to have merit as a viable, low-cost intervention with the potential of helping individuals with diabetes who need to change their behavior.